What would you rather see? Rousey/Tate 3 or Rousey/Holm?

[DetachedOrchid]

R3 vs Holm

 

[JarlSkuld]

Holm

UFC made the right choice and people need to quit their bitching

Holm. New face with a real combat sports background and pedigree. And it's not like Holm is getting any younger. 33 years old is pretty much entering middle age when it comes to MMA.

Tate was already 0-2 against Rousey. Anyone who was genuinely excited for Rousey-Tate 3 is most likely just a huge Tate fan.

i'm not paying $60 to see ronda vs tate 3. it's a waste of my money to see that shit again.

I don't see why ANYONE would be excited for Rousey vs Tate 3, except hardcore Tate fans.

Tate already lost twice, rather see Holm

It made no sense to have Rousey destroy Tate for a 3rd time. It is not like the first 2 fights were close.

I say thing like this on the WMMA threads and Tate fans dog me constantly - even inventing the term "Tater" to describe what is me just not wanting to see her fight for the title for a third fucking time. But looks like I am not alone in that opinion.

I vote for Rousey vs. Holm.

Jarl

 

[Strange King]

Neither. Fight cyborg

 

[Morning Star]

Neither. Fight cyborg

+1

Not gonna happen though since gaining 5 pounds for a catch-weight fight is too unfair to the "Baddest woman on the planet."

 

[RemyR]

Tate just because I'm sick of seeing matchmaking being a fucking joke.