Editing Tito out of his achievements, because of personal reasons.
Never happened. Of all the shitty things Dana has said, you pick the one thing that never even really happened.
Tito is still listed in the Official UFC Records at Fight Metric. Tito is still listed in the UFC HOF (he wasn't coming up for some people, but the same was happening with some others like Griffin, for example). His wins weren't taken away. He wasn't on the LHW wins list because some of his and Chuck's wins (or anyone else with wins that predate UFC 31) don't count as modern LHW wins.
That whole thing just goes to show when you have people who look for reasons to complain about the UFC and habitual complainers like Tito, you get snap judgments without people doing their due diligence. The UFC/Dana have plenty of questionable things they have said/done. But in reality, about half the things people complain about can be explained away. But people would rather bitch, because that is what some people just like to do.
Cutting Fitch. I mean he was still top 10...in the fucken world. Think about it
But he was boring. I cant blame dana and the ufc for not wanting to pay him.
For the two comments above, this highlights the problem. People bitch because they cut Fitch, Okami, and Shields, and because they didn't sign Askren. But for every person who complains, there is somebody who says they are glad because they don't like watching them. This is the crossroads of sport, entertainment, and business. This isn't a situation where everyone is on the same page and is against the UFC's decision. The fans are split on this one. I personally would like for them to still be in the UFC, but there are plenty of people who disagree.
He cut all of AKA, including Fitch.
I might be wrong, but I didn't think they all ended up getting cut. I knew Fitch and Wellisch were cut. I know Swick wasn't cut. I thought the issue was resolved without Koscheck and Velasquez actually getting released. Like I said, I might be wrong.
Saying that unlike boxing in the UFC we get all the fights the fans want to see and then not signing Askren.
Now, I will defend the UFC here. Sure, we can all point out some fighters that should be in the UFC and aren't (see above response in regards to Askren, Fitch, Okami, and Shields). But for the most part, they do have the bulk of the top fighters. For the most part, these guys fight each other. Champions actually do defend against the top ranked guys. We are more likely to see the #1 and #2 guys fight in the UFC than boxing. Sometimes, fights can't be made for various reasons (injuries, contract disputes, fights getting turned down, etc). But for the most part, they try to put the top guys against each other, and as I said, they do have a very large % of the top ranked guys in each weight class.