What this forum needs!

Swegen

Orange Belt
Joined
Jul 3, 2007
Messages
387
Reaction score
0
There needs to be a ranking scale here similar to the bodybuilding.com forums. When someone is a jackass and only posts biased BS let the peers rank that poster. Now I don't care about what belt you are, I've seen jackasses in all shapes and sizes. I've also seen some of the most intelligent posts coming from White Belts. The forum needs a ranking system. Like Amazon.com, Ebay, Bodybuilding.com. If your credibility sucks you get overlooked plain and simple.
 
So...how would you rate your own thread, seeing as how you posted it in the wrong forum, and no one responded, so you had to resort to bumping it yourself?
 
So...how would you rate your own thread, seeing as how you posted it in the wrong forum, and no one responded, so you had to resort to bumping it yourself?

Just a suggestion sorry this is the only category I post in.
 
No worries...I was just ribbing you a bit.
 
This actually isn't a bad idea..
 
dont you think that if someone doesnt agree with you they will just give you a bad rating? I think too many people would abuse the system. *bumps own ranking*
 
This actually isn't a bad idea..

This is the only legitimate idea I could come up with. They may not have the code support for it though. This is the best MMA forum out there but it's very hard to find unbiased true MMA debates, that is my only complaint really.
 
dont you think that if someone doesnt agree with you they will just give you a bad rating? I think too many people would abuse the system. *bumps own ranking*

Well it would make people think more carefully before posting. Well I'm sure they can set it where you cannot vote for yourself. Majority rules man, I mean if 3000 people say you're an asshat, chances are you're an asshat. Now I think people with less credibility's vote would mean less as well. Or maybe the rating privilege is denied altogether until you have good credibility yourself.
 
Well it would make people think more carefully before posting. Well I'm sure they can set it where you cannot vote for yourself. Majority rules man, I mean if 3000 people say you're an asshat, chances are you're an asshat. Now I think people with less credibility's vote would mean less as well. Or maybe the rating privilege is denied altogether until you have good credibility yourself.

That would be the only way it would work. But still I think people would abuse it. I'm for it if we could prevent that
 
Back
Top