- Joined
- Jul 5, 2017
- Messages
- 13,066
- Reaction score
- 20,835
So what exactly is your point?
Let's take the last fight Dat Nguyen vs Abdiel Valasquez.
A former pro boxer vs an MMA fighter.
Why is it some kind of achievement for a pro boxer to beat an mma fighter in a BK fist fight?
I saw two guys swinging, the pro boxer was much crisper and got a nice KO.
But...he still got dropped in the first round with an uppercut.
Incidently, the 'pull down neck and uppercut' is trained alot in WC also it is a standard technique so it was nice to see it pulled off.
They both took damage, did you see Nguyen's face afterward.
The impression I get is that boxers are not 'dominating and huniliating' their opponents in BKFC at all. They are winning, but they are proving to be very beatable also and especially vulnerable to the clinch striking. In all, BK seems to act somewhat as an 'equaliazer' that is scrappy guys who wouldn't be able to hold a candle to guys in a boxing ring are being competetive with them in BK which is why it is interesting and a clear sign it is a different game.
I feel like BK isn't a sport anyone dominates unless they don't give a fuck about their hands, I feel a guy like Mark Hunt would dominate in BK. But fighting without any glove is just one missed shot away from a fractured hand.