Kyrie is 6'2-6'3. Same height as curryThe Cleves have a nice pick and roll offense to unravel the defense of the GSW they had created during the playoffs final and for some reason they have not been able to find a counter measure for it (haven't really dug through enough to ponder over as of yet). Also they seem to be a glass cannon in that they are very offensively minded strong team perhaps the strongest at the moment, but their defense is lagging. Another thing for the Cleves is they also recently heavily focused on three point shots so that gives them as much versatility in attacks as GSW does. This allows for guys like Kyrie Irving to go to work as he doesn't need much space to make things happen, he is pretty much a modern day Scottie Pippen to Lebrons Jordan duo attack. I think two great players is optimal for dynamic team sports as opposed to three. Which makes sense considering that three of the top players for the GSW are suited for more of an offensive style, that is one less player specialized for defense plays you need more then one Draymond Green to make it efficient with the turnovers, rebounds etc.
Lebron is a solid player that keeps all the other players games in top form without the other guys having to worry about their other teammates, Lebron in that sense hustles hard to take the slack for the rest of them allowing them to focus harder on their positions the very same way Zidane did for France's national team.
Going back to Kyrie Irving, he is a relatively short guy for NBA standards but the short man is proving his usefulness in the game that has been forgotten in all mainstream sports. Guys like Gretzky in NHL or Sanders in NFL are not too common these days, and their are plenty of them it's just the scouts pick for big monsters that cover all facets of the game including the marketing factor. For one thing Kyrie is incredibly accurate when taking shots off balance, he is hard to cover because he is more agile and being short gives him shorter center of gravity so he is still stable enough to make accurate shots. Being shorter he has a better VISION for the net which makes it easier for him in comparison to guys taller. This is why Curry has an easier time making those 3's as well, only difference is Kyies is used to working in the paint and his playing style suits is more aggressive. He displays overall better athleticism and confidence than Curry.
I have to also add Kyrie has a unique way to offset defenders anticipation of his shot with creative ways of feinting a shot or shift. He has exceptional footwork that is very efficient and is worth noting for.
Kyrie is 6'2-6'3. Same height as curry
Last time I checked dubs were the best team in the west and the Lakers sucked dick. Talk shit again when the lakers make the playoffs.Cuck Curry absolutely sucks. @dream LOLOLOL
Warriors eliminated a fully healthy rockets team in five games without Steph.They were lucky to even make it to the second round of playoffs in 2015. Every opponent they faced had 1-3 starters out in the series. Even in the Fn Finals. They are a one hit wonder team. Their bandwagoners are the worst to come out in NBA history. Fuckem
The warriors held the cavs to 38% shooting though...The Cleves have a nice pick and roll offense to unravel the defense of the GSW they had created during the playoffs final and for some reason they have not been able to find a counter measure for it (haven't really dug through enough to ponder over as of yet). Also they seem to be a glass cannon in that they are very offensively minded strong team perhaps the strongest at the moment, but their defense is lagging. Another thing for the Cleves is they also recently heavily focused on three point shots so that gives them as much versatility in attacks as GSW does. This allows for guys like Kyrie Irving to go to work as he doesn't need much space to make things happen, he is pretty much a modern day Scottie Pippen to Lebrons Jordan duo attack. I think two great players is optimal for dynamic team sports as opposed to three. Which makes sense considering that three of the top players for the GSW are suited for more of an offensive style, that is one less player specialized for defense plays you need more then one Draymond Green to make it efficient with the turnovers, rebounds etc.
Lebron is a solid player that keeps all the other players games in top form without the other guys having to worry about their other teammates, Lebron in that sense hustles hard to take the slack for the rest of them allowing them to focus harder on their positions the very same way Zidane did for France's national team.
Going back to Kyrie Irving, he is a relatively short guy for NBA standards but the short man is proving his usefulness in the game that has been forgotten in all mainstream sports. Guys like Gretzky in NHL or Sanders in NFL are not too common these days, and their are plenty of them it's just the scouts pick for big monsters that cover all facets of the game including the marketing factor. For one thing Kyrie is incredibly accurate when taking shots off balance, he is hard to cover because he is more agile and being short gives him shorter center of gravity so he is still stable enough to make accurate shots. Being shorter he has a better VISION for the net which makes it easier for him in comparison to guys taller. This is why Curry has an easier time making those 3's as well, only difference is Kyies is used to working in the paint and his playing style suits is more aggressive. He displays overall better athleticism and confidence than Curry.
I have to also add Kyrie has a unique way to offset defenders anticipation of his shot with creative ways of feinting a shot or shift. He has exceptional footwork that is very efficient and is worth noting for.
Last time I checked dubs were the best team in the west and the Lakers sucked dick. Talk shit again when the lakers make the playoffs.
The warriors held the cavs to 38% shooting though...
Who cares? Im just disputing your wrong take that the dubs cant defend the cavs. Holding them to 38% is concrete evidence that they can.yet they lost, why do you think that is?
Who cares? Im just disputing your wrong take that the dubs cant defend the cavs. Holding them to 38% is concrete evidence that they can.
Dubs have a weak defense. If the 3's aren't falling the other team has a good shot too win.
I am still amazed how in the fucking world they went 73-9 last year..... if memory serves me well they won atleast 8-10 games by the skin of their teeth
They had the second best scoring difference in nba history. Only the 96 bulls were better.Dubs have a weak defense. If the 3's aren't falling the other team has a good shot too win.
I am still amazed how in the fucking world they went 73-9 last year..... if memory serves me well they won atleast 8-10 games by the skin of their teeth
Main difference between GS and the 96 bulls is that the Bulls actually won a championship and didn't blow a 3-1 leadThey had the second best scoring difference in nba history. Only the 96 bulls were better.