Athletic prime? Sure? Fighting age? Idk...cumulative damage, injuries, wars come into play. While he started as a wrestler, Lawler fought like the JBG incarnate. Historically speaking, grapplers enjoy a much longer, successful career. I think Lawler is running on fumes.He is 36 years old. He is at least 7 or 8 years from his prime.
Only MMA fans think "mid 30's" is a persons prime lol.
And that is why he's a fun fighter to watch.Impressive isn’t how I’d describe Lawlers title reign. He wasn’t ever a dominant champion and fought life and death with contenders too frequently.
Of course, but his title run wasn’t very impressive though imo. He hasn’t had a single title performance where he looked unbeatable or dominant and ultimately got knocked cold. Doesn’t mean I didn’t enjoy the wars against Rory and Condit.And that is why he's a fun fighter to watch.
After an impressive run, he had a big defeat against Woodley, a last win against Cerrone, like 20 months ago, and a fair and square loss to RDA. Injuries, aging, too many wars, ring rust...how much far from prime could Lawler be?
On the other hand, Askren seems fresh. At this point, is this a mismatch?