- Joined
- Oct 2, 2016
- Messages
- 5,680
- Reaction score
- 1,831
Can't say it enough, the NC was the right call unless the rules change.
This is genuinely what I think happened. Look at his eyes when he comes back.Burgos got hit and was able to reset from the striking exchange before collapsing moments later. You saw his eyes sort of roll back in real time, but he was lucid before that. The point being made is/was that -- hypothetically -- Bellato could've gotten hit with the illegal upkick, registered it as such and looked to the ref to complain while still lucid (such as the time Burgos spent resetting), only to then go unconscious right after.
I personally am not saying that's what happened. If you said Occam's Razor would dictate that he's an unrepentant flop I certainly wouldn't argue with you. But I'm just throwing it out there because weird shit happens in fights and only Bellato himself can be 100% certain why he did what he did I guess.
Paul Craig vs Rodolfo Bellato (Upkick) No contest GIFS
I'm borrowing the GIFs from @KazDibiase and his above thread to copy here for the sake of convenience to those voting.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Understandably this exchange drew a lot of attention:
The fight took place at the State Farm Arena in Atlanta, Georgia. Here is that state's rule set for professional MMA for reference:
Interestingly, it makes no mention of upkicks to the head as a foul. So either it has not been updated, or more likely the UFC simply utilizes its own more specific rule set that naturally conforms to the state's regulations. Not my area of expertise. Nevertheless, I don't intend for the poll to be worried about stickling to rule set interpretations. I'm curious what Sherdoggers think would be the right thing to do, not necessarily the by-the-books thing to do, but it's up to you to vote according to what you think it is important.
Bellato had one knee off the ground. I don’t think Craig could have noticed the other leg unless he sat up. He is not stretchI've seen a lot of opinion on Bellato being disqualified for trying to milk an injury. That is certainly a viable thing, but it shouldn't go without mentioning the potential DQ for the guy who did the foul. Some of y'all excuse the stupidest shit. Craig threw a kick he should have known was illegal, showed everyone he knew the guy was down, but he was too dumb to get the rules right.
And we still have these people complaining about fouls not being called enough because fighters get away with eye pokes and groin shots and cage grabs all day, but when you get presented with an actual foul, it's always straight to victim blaming.
I think Bellato's performance was horse shit. But I also realize that, because refs never deduct points, that a fighter either has to continue with the disadvantage of being fouled usually with no deduction to compensate, or try to do something to get some actual enforcement by the refs. I don't like milking, but this is symptomatic of a greater issue facing the sport, and one that fans know is wrong, but the second they get an opportunity to react to it, they go "But I need my fight entertainment to be more fighty and only fighty! Death to the ones who paused the fighty!" Sherdoggers disappoint, yet again.
I'm sure in time, more people will start pointing out Craig's fault in this. The poll already shows more "disqualify" Craig results than I thought it would have gotten last night, but damn, y'all really need to practice not having your initial reactions dominated by thoughtless emotion
*Edit* Looking at the options, I would have liked the ref to have the balls to call out Bellato on his acting, warn him that if the doctor feels he can continue, then Bellato can get into serious trouble and try to encourage a continuation, after which Craig gets at least 1 point deducted, cuz 2 is also on the table.
This isn't just a snapshot in time, Bellato was coming from laying on Craig after diving fully into his guard. He was on both knees and BARELY got one leg up. There is every expectation in the world Craig should have known (just as Craig demonstrated one knee down to the ref the instant he got up, seemingly showing he did know), and that's because it would be nearly physically impossible for Bellato to get back to standing in that time. After all, Bellato is not stretchBellato had one knee off the ground. I don’t think Craig could have noticed the other leg unless he sat up. He is not stretch
I was debating this myself, because I think If the point was already taken, it should put a big dent in a fouled fighter's inclination to milk it, so that's the greatest result. I don't think there's any administrative issue preventing them from deducting before fully "assessing the damage."Take a point because it was a clear foul but then ask him if he wants to continue. Clearly though, he didn't. And hopefully this rule gets changed soon anyway.
Well most people wait till knees are off the ground to throw it. Not like he is going to wait till home dude is literally standing straight up to where it’s useless. He couldn’t see his right leg cause everything blocking it. His left, he can actually see cause it was on the outside and just had to tilt his neck. Accidents happen, but it’s a dumb rule either wayThis isn't just a snapshot in time, Bellato was coming from laying on Craig after diving fully into his guard. He was on both knees and BARELY got one leg up. There is every expectation in the world Craig should have known (just as Craig demonstrated one knee down to the ref the instant he got up, seemingly showing he did know), and that's because it would be nearly physically impossible for Bellato to get back to standing in that time. After all, Bellato is not stretch