- Joined
- Dec 7, 2007
- Messages
- 38,898
- Reaction score
- 11,366
Agreed. That's about half the population, too.
Link to that kind of numbers and why they can’t work?
I see all kinds of disabled people working. I’m fine with helping them.
Agreed. That's about half the population, too.
If you heard of someone stealing the same amount of money that the average welfare recipient gets during a year, it'd seem like a pretty serious crime.Its a relatively small percentage of our taxes and not really worth getting upset about but in my personal experience everyone i know who gets governmentt assistance is nothing but a lazy piece of shit
What about farmers getting welfare and corporate welfare, should the farmers and CEOs also pick up trash?Welfare is a fine idea in theory but its been bastardized and exploited to the point its practically a viable way of life. We should offer welfare without strings for a couple of months. Then you should have to give back to continue to benefit. Community service and the like. Just imagine if all the people in the inner cities on welfare spent a couple of days a week picking up trash around the city or something similar.
Ah, the weekly "If you're poor it's your own fault" thread. Same bullshit every time. Same weak defense of greedy rich people, same blindness to economic reality.
Meanwhile rich people suck companies dry, throw everyone out of work, and then collect tax breaks on their "loss". Just an awesome country all round.
Many around here have trouble grasping the concept of working poor or admitting such a thing exists. I think it's because if they did, they'd have to also admit that people on welfare are more likely to make working poor of themselves than continue to collect welfare if given the opportunity.
Almost everyone I know who has ever collected any kind of assistance waited until they were absolutely desperate for help to apply rather than try as soon as their need became evident. In other words, the average person on assistance doesn't want to be there and doesn't remain there any longer than necessary. People who complain about welfare are blind to the larger issue of rich people not paying their share of taxes (because it's usually them).
Not as a proportion of their income/wealth. You don't know what I know and what I don't know.The richest 10% pay 90% of all taxes. You don't know what you're talking about.
My gfs sister and her boyfriend collect food stamps. They own and rent out 5 houses and make a killing. They both are on disability for "excessive flatulence" Dead serious.Can someone share some anecdotes about people legitimately scamming the welfare system? I keep hearing about it but where is the proof?
So you are opposed to farm subsidies and corporate welfare also?
Can someone share some anecdotes about people legitimately scamming the welfare system? I keep hearing about it but where is the proof?
Why is it ok to subsidize farmers but not help poor non-Farmers?I’d prefer no corporate welfare. I’m ok with sensible help for farmers.
I am too blackpilled to believe either will happen any time soon.
Why is it ok to subsidize farmers but not help poor non-Farmers?
This is a good approach.Complex issue summed up: The original intent of a safety net is easily turned into a safety hammock that enables generational poverty.
OP seems to clearly imply social.Corporate or Social Welfare?