- Joined
- Aug 17, 2006
- Messages
- 20,330
- Reaction score
- 19,277
Not really.Nate is a shitty matchup for anyone who isn't a wrestling based fighter.
Not really.Nate is a shitty matchup for anyone who isn't a wrestling based fighter.
or naturally 170...Not really.
Odd thing to say about the UFC's first simultaneous two division champ.Conor isn't that good
Why? Conor is very clearly a better striker and Cerrone is at the tail end of his careerI expected an actual fight. I didn't expect either person to win specifically, but I expected a good fight.
Well, I would say that if I had to expect any outcome it would be either Conor getting a TKO or Cerrone out-veteran-ing him with Conor TKO being more likely. But I didn't expect it to happen in the first 20ish secondsWhy? Conor is very clearly a better striker and Cerrone is at the tail end of his career
Nate is a shitty matchup for anyone who isn't a wrestling based fighter.
Realistically, we know 2 things:
1) Conor hasn't defended his titles. He's lived questionably outside of the cage. He has lots of haters. But he is an elite and, though he hasn't proved it -- just showed signs of it, is likely an all time great.
.
I think he's in a very uncommon place between all time great and elite. He's clearly better than elite; even elites don't have the crazy wins he has over Aldo and Alvarez. He's also clearly not an all time great; all time greats don't lose in their primes like he did to Nate and Khabib. He's not a Fedor but he's also better than a Liddell. I honestly can't think of anyone else that exactly matches what he is. He occupies some unique real estate.He's an elite but hasn't proved it, you think maybe if he had even tried to defend 1 title of his two would've helped to his unproven elite status. And exactly what signs of eliteness can one gather from a 40 second fight? I learned more about Conor from his two fights with Diaz and his crash & burn with Khabib than his 13 & 40 second fights with Aldo & Cowboy.
It's said one can learn more from losing than winning I've learned a lot about Conor from his losses and learned that Conor is only truly good with quick KO's & endings, put him in a sustained fight with solid fighters he struggles more than your average fighter.
Will never look at Cerrone the same again after that fight.
You mean like Masvidal? Mas can wrestle but certainly isn't a wrestler...he made Nate his bitch standing up.
Hey, we are talking about Fabia and Reyes/jones this week
I think he's in a very uncommon place between all time great and elite. He's clearly better than elite; even elites don't have the crazy wins he has over Aldo and Alvarez. He's also clearly not an all time great; all time greats don't lose in their primes like he did to Nate and Khabib. He's not a Fedor but he's also better than a Liddell. I honestly can't think of anyone else that exactly matches what he is. He occupies some unique real estate.
Look at the 2 Nate fights and the Khabib one. Conor isn't that good, he certainly isn't an all time great.
While Cerrone is on the way down he usually puts up a much better fight before losing.
It's not that complicated. For every Aldo/Cerrone expect a Nate and Khabib.
Look at the Aldo fight, the Alvarez fight, the Holloway fight ... Conor is pretty good.
Jorge was a 155er too, he’s naturally smaller than Nate.or naturally 170...