MarlboroMan said:
shotokan karate has many things that need to be fixed.
1. doesnt have any contact in sparring
2. Teaches techniques like the "knife hand fist" or the "hammer strike"
3. spend half the class doing "katas"
4. Learn to be open-minded (alot of karate guys are in la-la land and think karate is deadly)
5. Stance is too robotic and square...wtf is the point of the horse stance and back stance?
6. Get rid of the belt system...its gay and it makes people act like nerds
6. the belt system is gay because fat and shitty people get promoted because people feel sorry for them.
7. Dont try to act like you can speak japanese just because you can say "seek perfection of character" in japanese
The Style that I trained in for most of my life was shotokan and I have to say.
1. Don't know what dojo you where training in or used to but stop. While I can't say that I know of any "full contact" shotokan schools, contact is kind of dubious. For example, the last national tournament I went to there were alot of guys that came home with broken noses (and allegedly there was supposed to be light to no contact to the face). By the way, before you even think it, the judges scored the shots.
2. I remember fighting an 'open circuit' (NASKA) guy who used to drop hammerfists on me and lots of other guys. Trust me, it is not a usesless technique. I am also pretty sure if you start getting hit with on the ground you wouldn't think that they were useless.
3. This really depends on which school and who the instructor is. Personally, when i teach (I'm shodan) I almost never teach kata (then again I am not too good in them either). Other schools might only teach kata and no fighting. I think the main problem, at least in the US is that most instructors don't know the real bunkai. I remember seeing a program on cable, Deadly Arts, where a women went to Okinawa and studied with masters of karate learning kata. Alot of footage was spent in the training of kata, but not just the robotic dance moves that we use in the US but the actual bunkai. The real infighting and trapping. It looked like a totally different art than most people practice here. I wouldn't mind practicing that. Here though, we have bs explanations for techniques in kata that make no kind of sense.
4. Karate can be deadly, just like any fighting art can be deadly. Heck, I remember my head instructor teaching us as white belts how to break necks. The thing is not too many people train in the way so that they are dangerous.
5. Horse stance is used to kick (side, roundhouse, hook) Ryoto Machida has used it a couple of times during MMA matches. Back Stance is often used to kick with the front foot (i.e. front kick) it can also be used for a quick counter such as shifting into front stance and striking with a jab or reverse punch while they are still stepping in to attack (this is used in traditional point fighting). I would have to agree about the rigidness of stances: for all the rigidness in the training of stances, you find that you may use some composite of stances or a modified stance but never the exact one that you trained in. For example I can't say that I ever saw a top level karateka that ever fought in a textbook, front, back or side stance.
6. To me, having taught classes the belt system helps me guage what I should be teaching students. I really don't know how 'gay' it is (I really don't hear to many people saying the the belt system in bjj is gay because it makes people act like nerds). As for the whole fat people getting adn shitty people getting promoted, I think you have to look at what the belts represent in karate: a basic proficiency in the skills of karate, which don't take much. Even shodan is really considered a beginning of real training and not the end of training. Thus theoretically, anyone can get a black belt if they study long enough, much like a HS diploma. On the other hand, in BJJ only a few elite will ever be a bb: kind of like the navy seals or rhodes scholarship. I don't really think this really needs to be changed. Ask a real karate black belt what a black belt means and they will tell you it doesn't mean that much and you can buy one out of a catalog (though maybe a black belt from their school may mean something). It really comes down to how well you can fight and in real schools, belts don't matter in that department.
7. Using Japanese terminology is for two reasons as I know it. One so that no matter where you train you know what a gyaku zuki is and what a mae geri is. And two, inorder to keep the cultural heritage. While the latter reason may not have any meaning to you since you aren't Japanese and possibly don't care, the former reason is very important. For example when I bought tapes from guys like Cristophe Pinna from France, I might not know what a lik of French, but I am do know what a gyaku zuki is. By the way, I don't that much about Muay Thai, but I do know that bjj does use brazillian terminology (mata keo) and at least from what I have seen from Japanese boxing/kickboxing they use english terminology (thought that may be a special case if you know what I mean).
Karateka666