What are Nate's chances of submitting Conor

jumasterflex said:
Well Nate has tapped out 3 black belts In the ufc so I'd day IF it hits the ground Nate has a pretty good chance of tapping him out
Click to expand...

This.

If it goes to the ground Conor is in BIG trouble.

Even if Conor gets on top of him after dropping him to try to GnP for the finish he is in big trouble, since Diaz has an iron chin.
 
steliokontos said:
You think Conors strategy involves letting his opponent hit him in the face? Sure he wants him to engage so he can slip and counter but the reason he gets hit is because his defense is shit, not because its part of his game plan.

If you think Conor is letting his opponents tee off on him, youre wrong. If you want to see the strategy done properly watch some early Tyson or Anderson Silva.
Click to expand...
are u able to comprehend whats being written? if not there is not a point discussing with you.. Il give you one more try.

OBVIOUSLY he aint LETTING them hit him.. But he is moving FORWARD, PRESSING the action.. TAKING RISKS, ATTACKING his opponent constantly.. hands down, bating them in so he can connect with that hard left hand.. Because he knows he has the most knockout power, and on top of that he trusts his chin.

There is a risk/reward thing. He could stay on the outside and pitter patt and avoid the punches easily with his movement etc. But he is here to put on a show and end it QUICKLY.

Do you seriously not understand that this tactic will get you hit more often??? And in his fights he hit his opponent way way waay more than he gets hit himself, so to say conor is easily hittable just like that is beyond stupid and ignorant. Oh and anderson aint got shit on Conor, he fought shit opponents in a different era, + he was on steroids his whole career. Conor is way more impressive than andy in his movement and finishing ability.
 
imo very low,
Nate is a great bjj fighter but he is not a good grapler.
he will not able to take Conor down
 
submission is the only way he can win, but the problem is Nate does not have great takedowns, so I dont think he is gonna be able to get Conor down
 
Jimmy jump said:
you're*
too*

I take it you failed that IQ test.
Click to expand...
how i choose to write on a online forum doesnt equal any signs of IQ. If you had a functioning brain you would know that. Lol!

People who focus on grammar on a ONLINE forum are the ones with nothing intelligent to say, thats a fact.

Prøv å skriv dette dumme amerikaner, you cant even speak more than one language fool ;D
 
Fight To Win said:
I would say statistically that it's his best shot at winning
Click to expand...

I agree with this.

On a related note, we've (well many of us anyway) have been wondering how Conor's power and chin would translate when he moved up a class. This will be a great indication for both. If he's able to finish Nate with standing punches I'll be impressed, "short camp" be damned. Also, Nate cracked mega-LW Maynard's jaw right quick standing. If Conor can eat Nate's punches like he has so far, his chin will go from real good to great...maybe even legendary.

All that said, I think Conor wins this by decision. We'll actually see his cardio put to the test methinks. He won't finish Nate.
 
Xplosive-Viking said:
how i choose to write on a online forum doesnt equal any signs of IQ. If you had a functioning brain you would know that. Lol!

People who focus on grammar on a ONLINE forum are the ones with nothing intelligent to say, thats a fact.

Prøv å skriv dette dumme amerikaner, you cant even speak more than one language fool ;D
Click to expand...

OK Norsk
 
His chances of subbing McG on the ground are good. His chances of getting McG to the ground are not good.
 
Jimmy jump said:
I don't need to debate with someone who agreed with my point.....I think you misunderstood.
Click to expand...
Nope you are out of your element here.

You have made zero points, and you clearly didnt understand anything that was being said. You are rabbelin.
 
Xplosive-Viking said:
Nope you are out of your element here.

You have made zero points, and you clearly didnt understand anything that was being said. You are rabbelin.
Click to expand...

1. I made the point that Conor isn't hard to hit.
2. You made the point that Conor isn't hard to hit because of his style.
3. You agreed with my point by making your point.
4. Go away you're boring you dumb Norsk.
 
Xplosive-Viking said:
conor isnt hard to hit? Lol thats stupid. he only gets hit when HE engages and open himself up to it, but while doing that he ALSO connects.. Conor hits way harder than nate, so that wouldnt count for shit.

its conors strategy that makes him open to getting hit, not his defence. Everybody who goes forward like conor does will get hit, everyone.
Click to expand...

You're missing five apostrophes. Four show omission and one shows possession.
 
Xplosive-Viking said:
are u able to comprehend whats being written? if not there is not a point discussing with you.. Il give you one more try.

OBVIOUSLY he aint LETTING them hit him.. But he is moving FORWARD, PRESSING the action.. TAKING RISKS, ATTACKING his opponent constantly.. hands down, bating them in so he can connect with that hard left hand.. Because he knows he has the most knockout power, and on top of that he trusts his chin.

There is a risk/reward thing. He could stay on the outside and pitter patt and avoid the punches easily with his movement etc. But he is here to put on a show and end it QUICKLY.

Do you seriously not understand that this tactic will get you hit more often??? And in his fights he hit his opponent way way waay more than he gets hit himself, so to say conor is easily hittable just like that is beyond stupid and ignorant. Oh and anderson aint got shit on Conor, he fought shit opponents in a different era, + he was on steroids his whole career. Conor is way more impressive than andy in his movement and finishing ability.
Click to expand...
Yes dropping your hands and baiting your opponent to engage so you can counter isn't new, but as I said the objective is to get the opponent to miss. I am sure you've heard the saying "make em miss make em pay"

Well instead of making them miss you're eating the shots they are throwing, you're doing it wrong. Conor has a good chin, but his defence isnt his strong suit. He has great offense though, but to suggest he is some Mayweather type defensive specialist he just "choses to be agressive" is just wrong.

Silva was the master at this, his head movement and accuracy were at times phenomenal. You obviously have no idea what youre talking about, andy had an extremely high finishing rate and his movement was excellent, Andy isn't the same guy he was but rewatch some of his old fights to see just how good he was, to suggest he wasnt a phenomenal striker is Ludacris and shows youre ignorence on the topic (i am not a silva fan either)

the best I've seen (as far as I can remember) was Roy Jones in his prime. These fighters both show that being agressive and avoiding absorbing strikes are not mutually exclusive.

Next time try actually learning a few things about the subject before acting like a complete dick about it, there is no need for the attitude. Especially given the laughable crap you posted.
 
Jimmy jump said:
1. I made the point that Conor isn't hard to hit.
2. You made the point that Conor isn't hard to hit because of his style.
3. You agreed with my point by making your point.
4. Go away you're boring you dumb Norsk.
Click to expand...

No i didnt agree, cuz it is hard to hit conor when getting hit in the face, DUMMY. You said conor is easy to hit in generall, which he isnt. Big difference.

Some ppl are easy to hit cuz theyr defence suck, when u say it like that it seems like you are saying conor is easy to hit due to his defence being bad. U understand this right? yeah you do, so dont act liike anything else.

1. You made a shit point, indicating conors defence is bad.
2. Never said he wasnt hard to hit, just that it is easier to get hit when you PRESS the action and moves forward while trying to knock people out, that doesnt mean his defence is bad.
3. Nope, you misunderstand as usual.
4. Go away, you just made a fool out of yourself ya dumb american.



watch from 30 seconds, and realize how DUMB you sound when you say conor is easy to hit.. He dodges 3-4 punches after an attack, moving backwards. Rofl. #schooled
 
Xplosive-Viking said:
No i didnt agree, cuz it is hard to hit conor when getting hit in the face, DUMMY. You said conor is easy to hit in generall he isnt, cuz he choses to how he will fight. Big difference.

Some ppl are easy to hit cuz theyr defence suck, when u say it like that it seems like you are saying conor is easy to hit due to his defence being bad. U understand this right? yeah you do, so dont act liike anything else.

1. You made a shit point, indicating conors defence is bad.
2. Never said he wasnt hard to hit, just that it is easier to get hit when you PRESS the action and moves forward while trying to knock people out, that doesnt mean his defence is bad.
3. Nope, you misunderstand as usual.
4. Go away, you just made a fool out of yourself ya dumb american.
Click to expand...

1. Conor's defence is shit - he got tagged repeatedly by a midget with T rex arms on a 14 day training camp.

2. I'm not American.. but keep guessing Norsk
 
Jimmy jump said:
1. Conor's defence is shit - he got tagged repeatedly by a midget with T rex arms on a 14 day training camp.

2. I'm not American.. but keep guessing Norsk
Click to expand...

haha.. Wow good job in showing your true colors.. haterboy ;D I love your tears.

Funny how your the grammar police and cant use the word "norsk" correctly at all. You are an american, dont even hide it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,236,715
Messages
55,436,545
Members
174,775
Latest member
Ruckus245

Share this page

Back
Top