- Joined
- Aug 30, 2013
- Messages
- 8,500
- Reaction score
- 833
See my post above, there are too many politics when it comes to title shots, the guy with the belt isn't always the best, Brock wasn't and none of the HW champions in the UFC were during the Pride era.
Ever since the fall of Pride, the UFC champion has always been the consensus #1 fighter in their weight class with the exception of Fedor and the #1 p4p fighter has always been a UFC champion.
You say the guy with the belt isn't always the best, but Werdum has NEVER been the best in the world for a single day in his life. So what does it matter?
He's NEVER been the best in the world so how can we say he's one of the best of all time? It's lunacy.