- Joined
- Jun 13, 2009
- Messages
- 46,107
- Reaction score
- 102,812
He had some pretty legit wins at welterweight. To just say hes a lightweight that had no success at 170 is rude. He wasnt elite at 170 but he was definitely a welterweight as well. He beat story, medeiros, Cote and Olivier at 170. And his losses were to solid guys like Till, who's a 185er now, Jorge, Lawler and Edwards
Dont shit on cowboy just to shit on conor. He was a solid 170 pounder
Average fighter because he lost to people in top 10/top 5? I don't think you know what average means
Its also weird how people don't understand how time and wear and tear works.
I did. You suggest that because Cowboy used to be solid at 170 we should somehow not see the Conor fight for what it was.
Let’s be real here. Cerrone has always fought guys that are pretty high level. and he’s still had a lot of great KOs, subs etc. he’s done it in multiple weight classes, and he’s certainly decorated. He’s a guy who’s taken on top 10 guys for most of his career, and still has a solid record. But that’s not who he is right now. He’s got a new kid on the way, he’s accomplished just about everything he will accomplish, and he’s not a scalp that should quadruple your stock. We’re people calling for tony to get a TS after Cerrone? YES. Was it less dominant then Conors win? YES, but he also had a 10-12 fight win streak going in addition to that.Hmm, i thought I was pretty clear but I was tlaking about people who said Cerrone wasn't a welterweight and he was just a lightweight fighting up to fight Conor
I don’t care if conor took this fight as a tune up, I won’t knock McGregor for that, but let’s not pretend cowboy was the hard fight. It WAS a tune up fight. And he passed with flying colors. He looked amazing. But it was a tune up fight
Last edited: