- Joined
- Nov 18, 2006
- Messages
- 11,569
- Reaction score
- 8
I just thought the article was ridiculous. The Rocky Balboa analogy was funny as hell.
It's interesting that Neanderthals had much larger brains(like 200-300cc larger) than modern humans, and probably had larger encephalization quotients too.
They were the first to control the use of fire, and used a more advanced tool-kit than archaic homo-sapiens for a very long time.
Something seems to have happened about 40,000 years ago, which doesn't coincide with an increase in brain matter. We had a cultural explosion. Seven thousand years later is the date of the last fossil trace of Neanderthals we've found.
...makes ya think, doesn't it.
It's interesting that Neanderthals had much larger brains(like 200-300cc larger) than modern humans, and probably had larger encephalization quotients too.
Brain is cool, but if you want shoot at something a gun may help
No kidding. Guys who fought like that would break their hand/wrists quickly and be fucked. Even trained guys with wraps and gloves break their hands all the time.
The main reason for larger brains was because it gave off more heat. It was an adaptation to the cold climate. However, it's my opinion the potential for abstract thinking emerged as the brain developed more from australopithecus to homo sapiens.
Yeah it kind of does... isn't the common hypothesis that it was climate? The Neanderthal would be prone to sinus infections and required 2 lbs of meat every day, not as easy to come by when all the megafauna has died off.
Do you have a source for that? I don't understand - the brain produced more heat (and lost it quickly) and that helped what exactly?
However, it's my opinion the potential for abstract thinking emerged as the brain developed more from australopithecus to homo sapiens.
Yeah, but the big question for me is why we found so much rapid development in such a short period of time in AHS, but almost no development of any sort of the same kind in neanderthals, despite the difference in brain size and encephalization quotients.
Like...the fuck were they doing during that other 60 thousand years?
Do you have a source for that? I don't understand - the brain produced more heat (and lost it quickly) and that helped what exactly?
I don't have my biological anthropology book on hand so just bear with me for a sec.
Yeah, but the only difference between AHS and MHS is a forehead, and even then, some AHS had foreheads too.
What the hell happened 40,000 years ago?
...monoliths. That's what happened.
after a cursory google search found this article - kind of interesting.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45656171/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/we-do-have-bigger-brains-neanderthals-did/#.UPI0EW-7P6U
Modern homo sapiens have existed for 200,000 years. They had the ability to think like modern humans because they were modern humans.
I don't think you're understanding the problem.
The problem is:
nothing-nothing-nothing-nothing-nothing-nothing-nothing-nothing-nothing-HUGE-CULTURAL-REVOLUTION with no corresponding increase in brain matter, in an incredibly short period of time.
What happened? Also, yes we do have MHS remains from as far back as 200,000 years. However, to argue that AHS wasn't also prominent up until much more recently isn't exactly supported.
I don't think you're understanding the problem.
The problem is:
nothing-nothing-nothing-nothing-nothing-nothing-nothing-nothing-nothing-HUGE-CULTURAL-REVOLUTION with no corresponding increase in brain matter, in an incredibly short period of time.
What happened? Also, yes we do have MHS remains from as far back as 200,000 years. However, to argue that AHS wasn't also prominent up until much more recently isn't exactly supported.