They are definitely not russian, probably romanianbut then again, that chick probably never bumped into a russian tough guy:.
They are definitely not russian, probably romanianbut then again, that chick probably never bumped into a russian tough guy:.
It says ChechenThey are definitely not russian, probably romanian
I was referring to another video -It says Chechen
I was referring to another video -
Real fighting is everything goes besides groin kicks, eye pokes or weapons.
Real fights dont allow weapons now? So if someone pulls out a bat, does it become "Fake fighting" or some type of evolved fighting that has yet to be named?
You've just called someone a moron because you're not capable of having a reasonable debate with them, the only one who should be embarrassed is you.
Twat's a bit of a weird thing to call someone over the internet too, you need to work on your game a bit.
Real fights dont allow weapons now? So if someone pulls out a bat, does it become "Fake fighting" or some type of evolved fighting that has yet to be named?
Location: Milky Way
Have a seat you corny mf.
You can't keep up with argument.
What a surprise.
You posted one of the worst champions in MMA history being KO'd by a decent boxer.
I could post a gif of one of greatest champions in boxing history in James Toney being ankled picked & strangled by a mediocre MMA fighter in Randy Couture.
MMA is a FFA fight. Boxing is a punching match.
There is no debate as to which simulates a real fight. MMA does and boxing doesn't.
Your GP / Surgeon analogy stinks but I'll employ it to explain why you're view is myopic.
In boxing you have only have one "tool" to perform one "surgery". Your tactics & strategy will of course change based on opponent but your procedural is essentially the same.
In MMA, any & every technique works. We've already seen the highest levels of muay thai, capoeria, karate, wrestling, BJJ & sambo. In MMA you can be a GP or specialize in any particular surgery, whether it be BJJ, Sambo, boxing, muay thai etc.
In the early days we did not, until the skill level & highest level practitioners in their field participated. Eventually, 5 - 10 years down the line you will see MMA fighters have elite boxing.
There is already too big of a training cross over between MMA fighters, boxers & the highest level kickboxers for there not to be.
Don't confuse the truth for me thinking boxing stinks. In early 2017, I'm more so looking forward to the boxing schedule.
I agree. It's easier for boxers to polish their hands because that's all they work on. That's essentially my argument. MMA fighters have to train so many more disciplines just to stay on their feet in a fight.
Now we're seeing parity in the wrestling skills between wrestling specialists & strikers. Eventually we will see striking parity.
Don't confuse catch up with looking exactly the same. Like I already said, most boxing stances won't work in MMA.
We've already had the highest levels of BJJ, wrestling, sambo, muay thai, karate, catch, tae kwon do etc.
Boxing will catch up too.
Again, this isn't a boxing v MMA post. I'm a big fan of both sports but the truth is the truth.
"Real fighting" was a throw away term I used to describe a FFA test of all the martial arts in inter-species hand to hand combat.
I watch boxing for boxing and mma for martial arts and fighting. I enjoy both a lot. I never understood people who tune into mma and shit on the boxing in the sport. Like why are you watching mma for boxing? You watch mma for fighting and different techniques.
I'd actually estimate the majority of people who watch the average big PPV card watch MMA primarily just for the striking. From that perspective, considering the striking in MMA is of a much lower quality than what you tend to see in boxing or some variations of kickboxing, I can see the complaints (not that the average viewer really understands a lot of what they're watching, anyway). Let's not forget that Griffin/Bonnar is what many consider the turning point for MMA in the popular imagination in the US. It was a sloppy brawl between two guys with no power and poor skill. I don't know why someone would even really bother watching MMA if they didn't care for the grappling aspects of the sport, as they're just watching an inferior striking product. I watch MMA because I genuinely enjoy the sport, and that involves everything that comes with it. When it all comes down to it, the actual quality of the product rarely matters when it comes to whether or not something sells in combat sports. The larger stories around the fight or fighters is what the majority of the consumers care about.
I can understand that line of thinking, but for me mma is like human chess with high stakes consequences. Look at Lineker vs Dillashaw, Lineker couldn't open up and throw his volume like he normally does because he was being taken down. That's the chess match. It's problem solving at the highest level. There are mma strikers who could beat some kickboxers and boxers in a standup fight, it's already been proven. I understand at times it isn't the most technical, but mma is about implementing your craft and game plan and I enjoy that.
I do, too, it's just that's not really what many people care about. There were plenty of people complaining about how Dillashaw fought Lineker, for example, and this is among people who follow MMA close enough to post about it online.