- Joined
- Nov 24, 2010
- Messages
- 25,680
- Reaction score
- 9,927
Is anyone ever going to beat his 100 points in a game record? He set it in 1962. I get that defense has gotten so much better since then, but Kobe came close with 81.
I buy the 500lbs bench only because they say Shaq benched 450, but I don't even know if that number is legit.I did an epic thread on this years ago. Spent hours researching and pouring through links while trying to find official records. The Wiki on him proved to be the most inaccurate, misleading Wiki I have ever read. So much bullshit got through. It was hilarious how much of it was a hall of mirrors: bad references and footnotes to dead links. A lot of the links that were still live themselves had no reference, or were linking to a link of a link that was a dead end. One even referenced a newspaper article from the modern day that linked back to the Wiki, ROFL! Some misquoted the figure cited in the link.
I even tried looking through old newspaper articles about events in which he competed, and peeled through the records maintained by the schools he attended, or the track associations in which he competed. For example, the highest official high jump he ever recorded that I could find he recorded was 6'6", not 6'11".
With his arms don't even buy a 500lbs bench press. It wasn't like he was trained for the technique to bench with a shirt. His arms were a mile long. I could buy 400, but I'm skeptical he could do even that.
Except they didn't say 500lbs, they said 600lbs, so you have no reason to "buy" 500lbs. Furthermore, no, I don't believe that is accurate for Shaq, I seem to recall reading he said his PR was 425 or 430, but Shaq also weighed somewhere in the range of 390 when he was at his heaviest, and he was still in prime form between the weights of 330-360. Wilt was 275.I buy the 500lbs bench only because they say Shaq benched 450, but I don't even know if that number is legit.
Except they didn't say 500lbs, they said 600lbs, so you have no reason to "buy" 500lbs. Furthermore, no, I don't believe that is accurate for Shaq, I seem to recall reading he said his PR was 425 or 430, but Shaq also weighed somewhere in the range of 390 when he was at his heaviest, and he was still in prime form between the weights of 330-360. Wilt was 275.
Shaq is also one of the most athletic big men in history. He had a max vertical of 38" when he came into the league at 293. Note that the highest recorded max vertical in the history of the NBA Combine going back two decades is still just 45.0", and that's from a guy who didn't end up in the league. The recent dunk contest champion Hamidou Diallo has the highest of any guy who actually gets playing time at 44.5", and he's 6'3". BTW, that's another myth surrounding Wilt: that he could touch the top of the backboard. Nope.
People mistakenly think Shaq is fat because he carries the core of a strongman:
Trust me: Wilt wouldn't bench as much as Shaq.
Except this isn't true. There were plenty of 6'10-7'+ black dudes playing in Wilt's day like Nate Thurmond, Walt Bellamy, Willis Reed, Kareem, etc. What do you think 7' black dudes did back then? You think they didn't know about basketball?Wilt is overrated and has inflated numbers due to the inferior league he was in. He was called the most physically dominant because he was in a league where most guys were not exercising like fiends like they do today.
Also he's like one of the few black guys in a mostly all white league. His competition was no one near it is today or especially in the 90's. I doubt he'd get a 50 point game in today's league.
It's similar to Jack Nicklaus. He wasn't playing with heavy competition compared to Tiger Woods. If Woods played in Nicklaus era, he would have broken every record named.
Except this isn't true. There were plenty of 6'10-7'+ black dudes playing in Wilt's day like Nate Thurmond, Walt Bellamy, Willis Reed, Kareem, etc. What do you think 7' black dudes did back then? You think they didn't know about basketball?
I'm honestly not sure about this. I'll try to research that. By the 60s black players had a large presence in the league. Many of the best players were black.Yes I'm sure they were a few black players, but nothing compared to what it is today or 90's. Just answer me this question. Was it mostly white players during Wilt Chamberlain era? Yes or no?
With the way the league is focused on 3s I could see a couple of guys getting hot and getting close. Harden,Curry,Klay would be top of the list but you'd need a perfect storm of events.They'd have to red hot in a close game that probably goes to OT. Look at some of Hardens stat lines where he goes for 55 and still misses 10 3sIs anyone ever going to beat his 100 points in a game record? He set it in 1962. I get that defense has gotten so much better since then, but Kobe came close with 81.
Wilt's peak was around 300, but Shaq's peak was 390. Wilt's rookie weight was 250 to Shaq's 293. That ~250 is what he was weighing when he made his marks in track in college (that all aren't nearly as good as what people bandy about him).I have no doubt that Wilt was stronger than Shaq. We'll have to agree to disagree on that one. & I heard (or read) Arnold saying Wilt had a 500lb bench. Wilt himself said his playing weight was 300-310 (I can post the vid if you like). Shaq is not in Wilt's league as an athlete imo.
This dumbass "Richard JT" believes Wilt had a 55" vertical leap. This is why people mock journalists. They're just not smart people."Wilt wouldn't be able to dominate this current era"
What would it be like if a prime 7'1'' 300-pounder with a 55" vertical and a 500 bench press came into the league now? I think he'd expose the NBA for the sham it is today.
First, he'd definitely lead the NBA in rebounds. He'd average 18.
Second, he'd lead the league in blocks. He'd average six or seven.
Third, he'd lead the league in shooting percentage for guys over 15 points per game.
He'd average over 60 percent.
Fourth, he'd lead the league in free throws tried. 15-20 per game.
He would also lead in minutes played at 45 per game. No center could run with him.
He'd average well over 20 points and a fraction over seven assists, also. And his team, no matter which one he's put on, would contend immediately.
Wilt's peak was around 300, but Shaq's peak was 390. Wilt's rookie weight was 250 to Shaq's 293. That ~250 is what he was weighing when he made his marks in track in college (that all aren't nearly as good as what people bandy about him).
I detect in your a desire to believe Wilt was superhuman, and more than he was. Don't fall prey to this. Shaq wasn't as fast, but he was just as explosive, and he was so while being bigger/stronger. Love Arnold, but I am uncertain he said that, and even if he did, I'm not interested in anecdotal legends from bodybuilders. Not buying. Those guys can't even tell the truth about their heights within 4" of the reality. Besides, the 500lb whopper gets reprinted by irredeemable morons. Example:
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/438984-wilt-chamberlain-did-he-really-play-in-weak-era
This dumbass "Richard JT" believes Wilt had a 55" vertical leap. This is why people mock journalists. They're just not smart people.
He's about 360, apparently, in the video I posted above, and this is old Shaq. No, he wasn't fat at that weight. He was fat when he ballooned up to nearly 400 lbs, and the Lakers were lying on his listing, but announcers like Walton would relay anecdotes about talking to the LA trainers who would mock that listed weight, and said he was closer to 400: in the 390ish range.Wilt played north of 300 in his Laker days. I love Shaq, but he was fat for most of his career. He should never have got that big.
You underestimate Shaq's athleticism because you've been listening to these fish stories about Wilt all these years, and it has colored your perception of the truth. It was all lies, man.& no, not superhuman, but a different caliber athlete than Shaq. & Shaq is like my favorite celeb ever. Wilt was taller & stronger than Shaq. I don't think the folklore is based on lies. There are people who witnessed both that will tell you that Wilt's strength was on a different level.
Shaq played at 390+?? That's nutsHe's about 360, apparently, in the video I posted above, and this is old Shaq. No, he wasn't fat at that weight. He was fat when he ballooned up to nearly 400 lbs, and the Lakers were lying on his listing, but announcers like Walton would relay anecdotes about talking to the LA trainers who would mock that listed weight, and said he was closer to 400: in the 390ish range.
You underestimate Shaq's athleticism because you've been listening to these fish stories about Wilt all these years, and it has colored your perception of the truth. It was all lies, man.
Embrace skepticism. It will set you free.
Concretely, he was listed at 360 at his heaviest, IIRC, but again, the announcers used to roundly mock that figure, and would talk about it during broadcasts when he played, with everyone relaying inside information, or speculating based on past listed weights while offering eyeball comparison of before/after pics. Concretely, Wilt was never listed above 300. He was listed at 275 even by the Lakers on their roster.Shaq played at 390+?? That's nuts
I think your skepticism has gone too far!
possibly a bit padded, I did find video of him doing a 6'6" high jump AT ONE competition, not personal best.He was one of the most gifted athletes in history, but it's just stupid how many fish stories get told about his ability.
He didn't run a 4.4. He didn't bench 600 lbs. He didn't high jump 6'11". He didn't run a 10.9 100m. He didn't triple jump 50-ft. All of those are bullshit.
like Kareem?Yes the game is played differently now. It's not high school level talent
Yeah, I just talked about the Wiki and how wildly inaccurate it is. That footnote makes no mention of these alleged feats, and certainly provides no hard references to any. It's a blog site.from wikipedia: As he did at Overbrook, Chamberlain again showcased his diverse athletic talent. He ran the 100-yard dash in 10.9 seconds, shot-putted 56 feet, triple jumped more than 50 feet, and won the high jump in the Big Eight track and field championships three straight years.[29]
the guy is ridiculously talented in his prime, and nobody comes close, especially 7' tall athletes.
His 10.9 in the 100m dash is actually a conversion (10.94) of his PR in the yard-race, but that's gifting him a 10.0 flat, since they didn't record beyond the tenth decimal, and it was hand-timed, which means you have to add ~.15 to that figure. In other words, his 100m time if properly timed today would be 11.0-11.1 depending on how the watch time was rounded. Quite impressive, but people immediately take the lowest possible figure, and don't account for what's true.Yes, I know how to Google. I've been here before with jrams.
There's no eyewitnesses. It's bullshit. Remember this is from the biggest bullshitting "sport" that ever existed (bodybuilding) where exaggerating competitor height by as much as 4"-5" is routine.
Shaq benching 450 is infinitely more believable than Wilt benching 500. Shaq weighed up to 370 at times, had a shorter wingspan, and wider shoulders for a better leverage coefficient.
Here is an example of credible figures; they are elite, but not inhuman. For example, those track times are his PR's from college in yards (100m= 10.94 converted...very fast but not mindblowing). Yet when I started looking through microforms and other old hard sources (such as results sheets from actual college track meets) I couldn't substantiate his triple jump figure, here, IIRC.
Did you notice something about all these "sources", Reroute? They're not actually sources. They don't actually source specific dates and track meet times. They don't substantiate these figures with citation of official and formally recognized, sanctioned events. They don't point to result sheets and officially maintained records. Once somebody went sniffing around his old high school region, and there was an amateur enthusiast who maintained all the age group records. He said he couldn't corroborate many claims about Wilt's records when he was asked to source them.
The more underwhelming stuff holds up.
He was an incredible leaper given his height and weight, and his all-around athleticism is among the greatest of all time, but it's also among the most recklessly embellished.
Growing up, heard all sorts of stories about wilt and his records, and many dismissed his weak era. But with YouTube, I sort have went down the wilt rabbit hole with some impressive stats and info.
he runs a 4.4 40 yard.... insane for a 7’ giant
48” vertical, so he’s very tall and has the most impressive vertical in all of NBA.
Assist leader for two years
Bill Russell claims was the best to ever play.
Ran faster than NFL hall of fame Jim brown
7’8” wingspan
Was asked to stop scoring at the end of his career to allow for his team mates to score. Average center during his Era was 6’11
MVP and rookie of the year and has the highest PPG that year that nobody else has surpassed.
2000 rebounds in a season
Only player to win scoring and rebounds record in the same season, and did it six times.
only player to score 40 points AND have 40 rebounds in a game and he did it 6 times.
Bench 600lbs
Tricep extensions of 170lbs, while Arnold and his buddies could only do 150.
Ran a 10.9 100yard
High jump of 6’11”
Triple jump of 50ft
his athletic + physical traits far surpass any human alive, past or present.
Yeah, I just talked about the Wiki and how wildly inaccurate it is. That footnote makes no mention of these alleged feats, and certainly provides no hard references to any. It's a blog site.
https://archive.ph/20130111005833/http://www.hickoksports.com/biograph/chamberl.shtml
Look up his Big Eight recorded performances that you can find. It's all bullshit. He did win the high jump in the Big 8, and 6'7" was his PR. His first win of those three was actually the final Big 7 championship, and his championship performance was 6'5".
Otherwise, he didn't do any of that except the shot put, but that figure is not that insanely impressive. That shot put figure, for example, is on par with the strongest throwers among elite decathletes, for example, who tend to weigh around 170-190 pounds, and who have far shorter arms with which to generate force/speed to propel the put.
Here's an old post I made on the topic. Unfortunately it's not the post, that got lost in the changeover, but it's sobering. You see his triple jump of over 50-feet claimed in the jpeg below, but that was the only one I couldn't confirm when I did my deep dive. There was no record of it:
https://forums.sherdog.com/posts/114821987/
His 10.9 in the 100m dash is actually a conversion (10.94) of his PR in the yard-race, but that's gifting him a 10.0 flat, since they didn't record beyond the tenth decimal, and it was hand-timed, which means you have to add ~.15 to that figure. In other words, his 100m time if properly timed today would be 11.0-11.1 depending on how the watch time was rounded. Quite impressive, but people immediately take the lowest possible figure, and don't account for what's true.
Keep in mind all of the below were performed when he was at or below his 250-pound rookie bodyweight:
High Jump = 6'7"
Long Jump = 22'
Triple Jump = unconfirmed
100m = 11.0-11.1 (conversion)
200m = 20.9 (conversion)
400m = 48.7 (conversion)
Bench Press = ??? (never demonstrated publicly or performed in a meet, ever)
Great runner/jumper at his size, but not outside the realm of what bigs have done since. Here's Dwight Howard on the TV show Shaq vs. besting retired world 100m world champion Maurice Greene in a 60m dash leadoff relay leg: