- Joined
- May 25, 2012
- Messages
- 13,822
- Reaction score
- 1
Scorched X2You have another countries monarch on your money.
Scorched X2You have another countries monarch on your money.
Was the U.S. ever meant to be a single, large nation? Gosh, that's a hard one. I wish there was some document that made clear if the various states were meant to be governed by a larger overarching Federal government. A document that might spell out exactly how that Federal government is meant to operate and how it's operations would intersect with the states.
But where would we find such a document?
I'm sure that Trump really is looking to gain the role of executive so as to reduce the role and power of the executive. That's some quality logic on your part.USA is supposed to be 50 independent states that have a Federal Government that protects the states militarily. The Federal Government was never designed to rule the USA but has become that through political corruption.
When being a politician becomes a career the politicians focus on staying politicians. I don't blame them. When you have a job you want to keep that job. It is, however, not supposed to be a job.
Trump 2016.
He doesn't need money or really care what you think of him, he just wants to help our country in the last years of his life. Nothing more selfless than that.
The Union was voluntary until Lincoln forced us into a horrible war.
What do you mean?The Union was voluntary until Lincoln forced us into a horrible war.
USA is supposed to be 50 independent states that have a Federal Government that protects the states militarily. The Federal Government was never designed to rule the USA but has become that through political corruption.
When being a politician becomes a career the politicians focus on staying politicians. I don't blame them. When you have a job you want to keep that job. It is, however, not supposed to be a job.
Trump 2016.
He doesn't need money or really care what you think of him, he just wants to help our country in the last years of his life. Nothing more selfless than that.
Lol. You are talking out your ass. A black/white only business is not unconstitutional, and never has been held to be unconstitutional. It is illegal under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which draws its constitutional authority from the commerce clause under the theory that racial discrimination in private businesses has an effect on national commerce. It is against the law. It is not unconstitutional (at least US Constitution state constitutions vary and could make such conduct "unconstitutional").sure; if the people of Virginia wanted to make legal "white/black only businesses," the Feds would step in and deem it un-Constitutional even though there is nothing in the Constitution denying the right of private businesses from doing so.
And was also reinforced by the SC decision in Heart of ATL Motel v USLol. You are talking out your ass. A black/white only business is not unconstitutional, and never has been held to be unconstitutional. It is illegal under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which draws its constitutional authority from the commerce clause under the theory that racial discrimination in private businesses has an effect on national commerce. It is against the law. It is not unconstitutional (at least US Constitution state constitutions vary and could make such conduct "unconstitutional").
Was the U.S. ever meant to be a single, large nation? Gosh, that's a hard one. I wish there was some document that made clear if the various states were meant to be governed by a larger overarching Federal government. A document that might spell out exactly how that Federal government is meant to operate and how it's operations would intersect with the states.
But where would we find such a document?
The Union was voluntary until Lincoln forced us into a horrible war.
He did just let them secede..... the south attacked an Army fort. " Attacking America" is usually seen as a good reason for war.It seems like Lincoln should have just let them secede and everything would have been all roses but I think if he had there would have been a war fought anyway so he preempted them.
He did just let them secede..... the south attacked an Army fort. " Attacking America" is usually seen as a good reason for war.
Was the U.S. ever meant to be a single, large nation? Gosh, that's a hard one. I wish there was some document that made clear if the various states were meant to be governed by a larger overarching Federal government. A document that might spell out exactly how that Federal government is meant to operate and how it's operations would intersect with the states.
But where would we find such a document?
Was the U.S. ever meant to be a single, large nation? Gosh, that's a hard one. I wish there was some document that made clear if the various states were meant to be governed by a larger overarching Federal government. A document that might spell out exactly how that Federal government is meant to operate and how it's operations would intersect with the states.
But where would we find such a document?
The cult of the "founding fathers" is really very strange.
These men were rich, slave owning traitors to the British crown who won their rebellion thanks to French ships and French money.
Who fucking cares what they wanted ?
Build a rational country. Stop with the rest of the crap