Ward vs. Gatti trilogy or Vasquez vs. Marquez Quadrilogy?

Discussion in 'Boxing Discussion' started by TheRainSong, Jul 13, 2010.

  1. TheRainSong

    TheRainSong Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2010
    Messages:
    2,303
    Likes Received:
    0
    Which did you enjoy more? Discuss.
     
  2. prod2821

    prod2821 Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2007
    Messages:
    18,107
    Likes Received:
    825
    Location:
    San Antonio, Tx
    I equally enjoy them both
     
  3. Del the Funk66

    Del the Funk66 Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,166
    Likes Received:
    1
    To me the Ward Gatti trilogy is a special set of fights. One that few can come close to.
     
  4. McDuck**

    McDuck** Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,582
    Likes Received:
    1
    Let's be honest, Ward and Gatti are second tier fighters. Marquez and Vasquez fights were contested on a much higher level.

    That said, Ward-Gatti fights were still excellent... Top trilogy of all time. It's just straight barbaric brutality.
     
  5. Fisticuffa

    Fisticuffa Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,919
    Likes Received:
    46
    Both, it's hard to pick one but if I had to I would probably go with Vasquez-Marquez.
     
  6. Tropics1020

    Tropics1020 Brown Belt

    Joined:
    May 28, 2008
    Messages:
    4,798
    Likes Received:
    0
    Except for the last Marquez-Vasquez fight, i haven't seen a bout from either of these trilogies, i get turned off when it's just two guys brawling back and forth for twelve rounds. I like to see a little more strategy and boxing skills than that.
     
  7. McDuck**

    McDuck** Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,582
    Likes Received:
    1
    One thing Ward-Gatti trilogy got going with them is that RAW will and tenacity it exhibited. It has a higher state of relative-stasis for fans because there was a lot of brawling with guys who are not extraordinary fighters. First fight was 10 rounds of caveman give and take fight. These guys stand there and took the punishment. While Marquez and Vasquez took significant damage, the offense that was dealt was much more skillful.
     
  8. Carbone Junior**

    Carbone Junior** Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2010
    Messages:
    4,098
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    I'll take Barrera-Morales trilogy over both.
     
  9. rsreed13

    rsreed13 Yellow Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2010
    Messages:
    204
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'd probably take the Vasquez-Marquez quadrilogy (I wish it had stayed a trilogy, though). The skill-level was higher, though the defense in both series is bad.
     
  10. kingobould***

    kingobould*** Purple Belt

    Joined:
    May 30, 2010
    Messages:
    2,255
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Cali
    I have to disagree the first fight of barrera- Morales rivals these Two trilogies but the last two not so much.

    I would have to take the marquez vs vasquez because of the skill and the drama that went into those fights.
     
  11. dubie86

    dubie86 Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,296
    Likes Received:
    60
    Gatti/Ward is the best youll ever see
     
  12. McDuck**

    McDuck** Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,582
    Likes Received:
    1
    I can agree with that. Let's be honest, after the first fight, Gatti got smart and started boxing Ward. The fights weren't even that close afterward.

    Marquez-Vasquez fights were damn close though. Fourth fight, which was totally unnecessary, probably downgrade their fight legacy, but the first three... Pretty amazing. Consistent back and fourth, lots of drama, lots of skills, people got hurt and often...

    With Barrera-Morales... Those fights were so damn close that you really can say which fighter won the trilogy. The other two you definitely can, Gatti and Vasquez.
     
  13. Fisticuffa

    Fisticuffa Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,919
    Likes Received:
    46
    In terms of skill Vasquez-Marquez I think was higher than Gatti-Ward.

    Morales-Barrera was even better in terms of skill level but the 2nd fight didn't live up to the 1st and 3rd fights where as Vasquez-Marquez the first 3 fights were all exciting with the third being the best.
     
  14. Gontran

    Gontran Amateur Fighter

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,577
    Likes Received:
    18
    Location:
    Montréal
    Gatti-Ward holds a special place in my heart but I understand people going with the quez's
     
  15. McDuck**

    McDuck** Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,582
    Likes Received:
    1
    Gatti-ward 2, 3 were entertaining fights, but they weren't really that close. Of course there were few moments similar to that of the first fight, but it's not close. First fight takes the cake, but as a trilogy with overall competitiveness with both fighters, Vasquez-Marquez and Barrera-Morales fights were much better.

    Ward-Gatti 1... The fight by itself is arguably better than any of the fights in the respected trilogies.
     
  16. TheRatman

    TheRatman Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2009
    Messages:
    3,009
    Likes Received:
    489
    Location:
    Albuquerque
    I am going with the Marquez vs Vasquez.

    And I am going to agree with McDuck on the Ward-Gatti. After the first fight Gatti was just way to smart to let himself get drawn into ward fight and just outbox him for the most part.

    Also didn't Gatti break his hand in the third fight early and still won the fight by just throwing the jab. I haven't seen the 2-3 fight in awhile cause I don't find them as good as the first.
     
  17. TheRatman

    TheRatman Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2009
    Messages:
    3,009
    Likes Received:
    489
    Location:
    Albuquerque
    One more trio I take over both of them is the Holyfield vs Bowe. That is the best trio I ever saw.
     
  18. prod2821

    prod2821 Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2007
    Messages:
    18,107
    Likes Received:
    825
    Location:
    San Antonio, Tx
    Patterson vs Johansson was a good trilogy
     
  19. The Fan Man

    The Fan Man Blue Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2009
    Messages:
    949
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm a Marquez/Vazquez Trilogy nut-hanger. It combined the blood and guts storyline of Gatti/Ward with the technical brilliance of Barrera/Morales. That third installment was my fight of the decade (yes, even over Castillo/Corrales I).

    As far as the fourth fight goes, I'm just happy they both got paid.
     
  20. McDuck**

    McDuck** Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,582
    Likes Received:
    1
    That's rough. Castillo/Corrales had some of the best in-fighting evar. That fight is ridiculous.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.