War Room Lounge v181: Escaped self-cloning female mutant crayfish take over Belgian cemetery.

[Fawlty]

@tonni crayfish wellness check

@JDragon thank you for bringing awareness to this.

Mod Note: This thread is for general conversation and any other conversations to avoid derails in regular threads. If you find yourself going off topic in a thread, please quote the person's post, come in here, click "insert quote" and continue on in here. This is also still the War Room. Do not expect OT/Bare Knuckles rules in here.

Spoiler: Link to Previous Lounge Threads

v152
v153
v154
v155
v156
v157
v158
v159
v160
v161
v162
v163
v164
V165
v166
v167
v168
v169
v170
v171
v172
v173
v174
v175
v176
v177
v178
v179
v180

 

[Sketch]

Now that is fear, I like it. The moment it hit 1000, the new thread was made instantaneously. Don't say you can't teach an old dog new tricks.

 

[AgonyandIrony]

Spoiler: Crow stuff

Super cool stuff. Anyone been watching the games today? Crazy day of football.

 

[Sketch]

Great now the fucking birds are well on their way to being self cloning mutants as well.

 

[Deleted member 579584]

Yep fuck football this year

 

[HereticBD]

Spoiler: Crow stuff

I prefer feeding birds who don't bring me garbage as a "reward".

 

[Fawlty]

Pole is up

 

[HereticBD]

*crawfish

FREbonics and all.

 

[Trotsky]

Literally how I picture tonni:

Jk, he's Dr. Evil

 

[Limbo Pete]

Best thread title ever imo

 

[Lead]

I wonder if you could bring yourself to admit that it's a lot better, morally, to vandalize a statue erected to the celebration of enslavement and treachery than it is to vandalize a city mural that calls for fair treatment of a minority. I think this is one of those questions that separates Libertarian nihilists from decent human beings.

I don’t have an attachment to confederate statues but like I said, I think the process of how to remove them matters. If we just allow rule breaking anytime we feel justified in doing so, it does much more long term damage than the boring avenue of going the legal route. Thats one of the main points of government. Are you proposing I’m a Libertarian nihilist for saying government should be used as the instrument of change? I don’t think that lacks priority in morals but just the way it should be handled.

 

[Lead]

Yep fuck football this year

Somehow the Steelers stopped Henry this week. Every fan has bad years.

 

[Deleted member 579584]

Somehow the Steelers stopped Henry this week. Every fan has bad years.

Cowboys are having 25 bad year's.

 

[Fawlty]

I don’t have an attachment to confederate statues but like I said, I think the process of how to remove them matters. If we just allow rule breaking anytime we feel justified in doing so, it does much more long term damage than the boring avenue of going the legal route. Thats one of the main points of government. Are you proposing I’m a Libertarian nihilist for saying government should be used as the instrument of change? I don’t think that lacks priority in morals but just the way it should be handled.

I think I can justify the question like so:

Everybody who plays by the social contract lives as if government owns that function, that legal means of justice. It's equally not as if morality has no overlap into areas of civil disobedience. So, refusing the question by stating the rules of society without a wink and nod to civil disobedience is one strategy of not having to make that moral delineation, and is of course suspicious.

 

[StoneColdSteveAustin]

 

[Lead]

Cowboys are having 25 bad year's.

The division rule keeps the season alive though, right? Might not matter much since you then would need to beat playoff caliber teams. I really don’t know who the favorite to win this year should be outside of the chiefs.

 

[Deleted member 579584]

The division rule keeps the season alive though, right? Might not matter much since you then would need to beat playoff caliber teams. I really don’t know who the favorite to win this year should be outside of the chiefs.

You are correct, I keep getting let down by the boy's, Andy Dalton just got injured and Dam might not come back anytime soon. The favorite should be the chiefs though but I could see a another upset this year. Hell the bears are 5-1 watch them go all the way.

 

[Lead]

I think I can justify the question like so:

Everybody who plays by the social contract lives as if government owns that function, that legal means of justice. It's equally not as if morality has no overlap into areas of civil disobedience. So, refusing the question by stating the rules of society without a wink and nod to civil disobedience is one strategy of not having to make that moral delineation, and is of course suspicious.

My take on civil disobedience is the person should be willing to take on the penalty for whatever they did. If the injustice is so great that they want to commit a crime to address it, they take on that burden. It’s usually them taking on that burden that sheds light on the issue to others and makes them question whether the thing they disobeyed was just and fix it. Or instead of civil disobedience, they could do the thing I originally said and just get it fixed by legal means if there really is enough interest in having it happen.

 

[Lead]

You are correct, I keep getting let down by the boy's, Andy Dalton just got injured and Dam might not come back anytime soon. The favorite should be the chiefs though but I could see a another upset this year. Hell the bears are 5-1 watch them go all the way.

I’m not following the rest of the league that well for quite some time. I hardly know the starting QBs outside of division. Just seems like a year quite a few teams have a chance to win.

 

[My Spot]

@hillelslovak87 Just a reminder that Kagan had never been a judge before she was nominated for the SCOTUS.