Voter fraud in Arizona to stop the socialist

D3thr0n3d K1ng

I do not wish to create joinder with you!!!!
@Steel
Joined
Aug 26, 2003
Messages
30,511
Reaction score
1,754
I have read on a couple sites about massive voter fraud in Arizona to tilt the votes in Clintons favor. According to the mayor of Phoenix, the number of polling places was cut by 70% since 2012, to the point where there was only one polling place per 22,000 residents. Apparently the local official in charge of the counting claimed it was due to 'budgetary concerns' lol. Apparently there were people who had to wait until midnight to vote, and long before that the local media was already calling it for Clinton. Theres even a White House petition now for people demanding a recount.

http://www.12news.com/news/politics...lleging-voter-suppression-in-arizona/99770558

My question: Is there anyone who believes the US isn't an oligarchy posing as a democracy at this point?
 
People make petitions for all kinds of stupid shit. Gonna go out on a limb and say that nothing will happen.
 
Phoenix metro favors Clinton, no? This is probably more about local incompetence in government.
 
It doesn't matter what the populace votes for. The democratic party can elect who they want. Same for the Rebublicans. They openly said they don't care who the population votes for and there isn't even a need for an election.



Here they just admit the primary doesn't matter and they don't even need to have an election. At 2:50 they just openly admit it. "The media gives the public the impression their votes matter." Then why are we holding the primary "Well that's a good question." Globalist filth just laugh at the idea that votes would matter.
 
Last edited:
Clinton gonna Clinton. Sanders gonna Sanders.
 
but then doesnt that mean people who wanted to voted for Hilary, also faced whatever "hardships" people who wanted to vote for Sanders faced?
 
This has nothing to do with Clinton or Sanders. The Republicans here have been cutting back on voting locations like crazy over the past several years. The idea is that because AZ is such a hotbed of early voting, that they did not need the voting booths. Obviously bullshit, but that is what the lead lady said.

Also, Clinton won the state by a huge margin, and while it is horrible that people were turned away, the recount idea is stupid. It was not just Sanders supporters who could not vote.

This is a voter suppression issue, caused by a Republican controlled system. This is not yet another Clinton conspiracy.
 
This has nothing to do with Clinton or Sanders. The Republicans here have been cutting back on voting locations like crazy over the past several years. The idea is that because AZ is such a hotbed of early voting, that they did not need the voting booths. Obviously bullshit, but that is what the lead lady said.

Also, Clinton won the state by a huge margin, and while it is horrible that people were turned away, the recount idea is stupid. It was not just Sanders supporters who could not vote.

This is a voter suppression issue, caused by a Republican controlled system. This is not yet another Clinton conspiracy.

Lol. Of course. It's all the Republicans' fault, somehow.

This is the left's "Thanks, Obama."
 
Clinton gonna Clinton. Sanders gonna Sanders.

And I'm going to keep on dancing like no ones watching.
GIF-Dancing-Brad-Pitt-dance-fist-pump-happy-GIF.gif
 
This has nothing to do with Clinton or Sanders. The Republicans here have been cutting back on voting locations like crazy over the past several years. The idea is that because AZ is such a hotbed of early voting, that they did not need the voting booths. Obviously bullshit, but that is what the lead lady said.

Also, Clinton won the state by a huge margin, and while it is horrible that people were turned away, the recount idea is stupid. It was not just Sanders supporters who could not vote.

This is a voter suppression issue, caused by a Republican controlled system. This is not yet another Clinton conspiracy.

Isnt it conceivable the Republicans did it to help Clintons chances? After all, she polls worse against Republican candidates, plus Sanders is probably a nightmare for them.
 
but then doesnt that mean people who wanted to voted for Hilary, also faced whatever "hardships" people who wanted to vote for Sanders faced?

Not if you have a huge advantage with early voting.

LMAO at the posters pretending Sanders hasn't been winning with same day voters everywhere but the south, with Clinton dominating the early voting. Pure propaganda.
 
Isnt it conceivable the Republicans did it to help Clintons chances? After all, she polls worse against Republican candidates, plus Sanders is probably a nightmare for them.
It's conceivable if you're an idiot. They cut voting in the places most likely to support clinton, and did it 4 years before the election.
 
I think it's a near lock that anyone who labels a politician "socialist" doesn't know what they're talking about.
 
I think it's a near lock that anyone who labels a politician "socialist" doesn't know what they're talking about.

Youve just smeared 80% of this forum. I used the phrase for a reason and its not because I dont know what it means ;)
 
Back
Top