- Joined
- Sep 5, 2013
- Messages
- 3,520
- Reaction score
- 2,495
How does he steal rounds
in their defense, not all decisions are equalIf it was that easy to steal rounds, everybody would've been doing that. The styles in MMA will be the same as they always were. There would be brawlers, there would be safe point fighters. No brawler can start fighting smart all of a sudden. Can you imagine Cyborg being tactical? She is one clean punch away from turning into full blown Wandy (with a wig).
nobody said it was easy I'm just saying it's the best way of fighting imoIf it was that easy to steal rounds, everybody would've been doing that. The styles in MMA will be the same as they always were. There would be brawlers, there would be safe point fighters. No brawler can start fighting smart all of a sudden. Can you imagine Cyborg being tactical? She is one clean punch away from turning into full blown Wandy (with a wig).
The outcome of their last fight was coin flip stuff. I thought max won, but it was Razor thin and neither guy judges their own fight. War Volk.
I would say the one with the superior skill set is the one able to adapt to get a win.even if he's a little bit inferior skill-wise.
I agree with you Volk won 3,4 and 5I would say the one with the superior skill set is the one able to adapt to get a win.
But I userstand why people don't want to accept the Volk vs Max 2 decision.
Based on the current rules Volk wins round 3,4 and 5.
Max fought to win Volk fought to win the judges over.
If you could score rounds 10-10 or 9,5-9 then Volk would have lost
nobody said it was easy I'm just saying it's the best way of fighting imo
with leg kicks, stalling in the clinch against the fence, and the occasional takedowns
being safe and effective just like Leon Edwards.
I predict that this style of fighting is the future in MMA when most top fighters become good at everything
the fighter who knows what to do to "steal" the round and is willing to do so would most likely beat his opponent even if he's a little bit inferior skill-wise.