You've never played with parlance? What a silly fucking hill to stand on. Second, an apologist defends an unsavory position. One who condones (there, is that better for you?) accepts a argued morally-wrong position. This is the constant misfire from your position. You are not aware of the decisions made to put them into the position, yet you are ready to cast blame on them for an action occurring to them. It's an astounding turn from reason. If I am to end up in a part of town, say, due to my ignorance of an area and the following of a faulty or misguided navigation system.... I am not THEN at fault for being robbed in the neighborhood I find myself in. Even more important, the type of the part of town, which i find myself in at any given moment, does not then somehow allow for me to be a victim of the circumstance. Annnnnnnyway. Gotta literally go teach English now. We're on auxiliary verbs. Sorry I didn't hold up to the standard on this subforum of the MMA forum. Good luck at being miffed by victims taking back their lives.