- Joined
- Dec 18, 2001
- Messages
- 17,507
- Reaction score
- 897
ok. type out this point youre making first next time instead of making some vague as fuck post.The basis for people's conviction that McGregor is guilty isn't being based off an anecdote or one person. It's based off a wide swathe of journalism and (if any is needed) a hell of a lot of very visible evidence that he is out of control and felt, at least for a very long period, that he was above the law.
Papers like the Irish Independent aren't gung-ho pundits who will chance their arm making up false claims about a highly serious and delicate case.
It's really frustrating to see people barging in to this thread with reactionary comments like "This again? C'mon guys", given the amount of damning information that's at hand if people only would bother their fucking arses having a proper look instead of running to the defense of somebody who's made a habit of tarnishing their own name over and over again.
and I agree. I'm not learning towards mcgregors innocence here. guy does not seem stable I don't know what he's capable of.