- Joined
- Feb 21, 2004
- Messages
- 21,025
- Reaction score
- 7,436
I think Fury is versatile, he has many tools in his toolbox. That's part of what makes him so hard to beat, that and his ring IQ and size. I think he can switch between the Kronk style and his older more pure boxer style. What we may see is a hybrid because Usyk can move so well, so Fury won't be able to walk him down as easily as he did with Wilder, he'll have to chase him and cut off the ring but Fury will want to use his size to muscle the smaller man around and sap some of his prestigious stamina. It's a fascinating match up.Agreed, tho the question remains how much did switching to Sugar Hill truly switch his style up vs the Ben Jones/Peter Fury point fighting brand? The Fury that fought Wallin looked like the Fury from Wilder 1, vs the Fury from 2 and 3 who appeared a much different fighter. Is that style just a function of dealing with Wilder, putting him on the rear foot, or has he truly adopted this Kronk style?
I also am eagerly awaiting the Whyte Wallin fight. It may be that Wallin is much, much better than people realize but not getting his due respect. The guy has lost just one time, to Fury, had a very decorated amateur career, is a tricky south paw is larger than Lennox Lewis. That Wallin win could end up being one of the best win on Fury's whole record, much like Conor McGregor decisioned a young Holloway and people used that against him, but no one knew how quality it really was until far later.
Wallin may well indeed be a lot better than anyone realised. I'll admit when he got named as Fury's opponent I knew nothing about him. I think Whyte is in for a tough fight and may hit a banana skin as he closes in on the WBC shot he's been chasing for so long.