Media USADA visiting Khamzat

safer.. maybe. Profitable? Fuck no, it’s counterproductive. They are literally paying a company millions to shelve there best fighters.

However you wanna look at it morally you might be right, but more profit long term? LOL put down the crack pipe buddeh, don’t even try to play mental gymnastics on this one.

What happens when fighters start getting seriously injured because their opponent is juiced to the gills with a never ending gas tank. That's going to set the sport back and impact long term finances
 
What happens when fighters start getting seriously injured because their opponent is juiced to the gills with a never ending gas tank. That's going to set the sport back and impact long term finances

What happens when your fighters/top stars are shelved for months and sometimes years at a time because you literally pay a company to bust down fighters for the sake of “good public image”? That will lose you a hell of a let more money than whatever bullshit you’re on about right now.

How much does not having USADA set back boxing? You don’t see anyone crying for it their, and nobody was crying for it to be introduced to the UFC when it was. It was brought in because the Fertittas wanted to legitimize the company for sale and nothing more.
 
Even playing field? So you are assuming that not a single fighter in the UFC is on steroids? I'm not gonna bother breaking it all down for the 1000th time online because it's pointless.
Christ no. Im not assuming no-one does peds. It's proven some do. I'm not even sure what your argument is.
Edit: " what is the point of anti-doping exactly"
Maybe to catch and punish cheaters that gain a unfair advantage by taking peds?
 
UFC spends millions each year on something that makes their product weaker.


Think about it this way, do you think Baseball has gotten the stain off of them for the steroid scandal that happened?

At the end of the day, people don't like cheaters. Cheaters will stain a sport. A new sport like MMA can't take on what Baseball had to go through.
 
Christ no. Im not assuming no-one does peds. It's proven some do. I'm not even sure what your argument is.
Edit: " what is the point of anti-doping exactly"
Maybe to catch and punish cheaters that gain a unfair advantage by taking peds?


If you can't catch everyone who's taking PEDs then it creates a more unfair environment than if everyone was allowed to take whatever they want. Get it to your head.
 
If you can't catch everyone who's taking PEDs then it creates a more unfair environment than if everyone was allowed to take whatever they want. Get it to your head.
So make cheating ok? You're dumb
 
He lives in the Caucus mountains?
 
What happens when your fighters/top stars are shelved for months and sometimes years at a time because you literally pay a company to bust down fighters for the sake of “good public image”? That will lose you a hell of a let more money than whatever bullshit you’re on about right now.

How much does not having USADA set back boxing? You don’t see anyone crying for it their, and nobody was crying for it to be introduced to the UFC when it was. It was brought in because the Fertittas wanted to legitimize the company for sale and nothing more.

I'm not going to discuss with you, the tone of your language suggests you have issues. Have a nice day.
 
With the amount of training that guy does, you'd think he'd have a more suspicious looking physique if he was using

No need to keep testing a guy with a prime Nick Diaz physique
 
With the amount of training that guy does, you'd think he'd have a more suspicious looking physique if he was using

No need to keep testing a guy with a prime Nick Diaz physique

lol at your username, we in the Khamzat era now brudder?
 
Back
Top