- Joined
- Nov 14, 2018
- Messages
- 24,868
- Reaction score
- 35,468
78 of our guys in erbil that was hit with a missile
CNN just said Trump may be getting ready to address the nation.
Did the Iranians actually attack our embassy or is that in dispute?
I was trying to read elizabeth Warren's take on it but she seemed to confirm both narratives
Imagine unironically sayingI thought it was the progressives who were the godless communists. It's the cons who are the overwhelmingly religious people who want to see the Temple rebuilt in Jerusalem. I just don't see the importance of Israel when one takes this religious fervor out of the equation.
Or at least we should have left when Saddam was killed.We should have never gone in in the first place.
It's the truth. You don't see any criticism whatsoever of anything Iran has done. They had one of their military leaders organize an attack on a US embassy. They talked about killing the US POTUS and not launched a missile attack on a US base. Yet people are talking about what Trump has done. It's ridiculous.
As I said, going to war in terms of a ground campaign is not going to happen. The most that will happen is air strikes and Iran is at a massive disadvantage.
Not “possibly”, definitelyIraqi (possibly Iranian proxies) vandalized the embassy for 2 days and went away. No killing or anything, but it certainly wasnt a peaceful sit in.
Bro, I'm not sure he was joking...
Serious question: was general salami or whatever, actually a terrorist? Or is that just a republican propaganda
Republican boomers keep posting on facebook that iran has been instigating over the years and I want to know if there lying
Iran would/will always be a quick one. Couple key figures to kill and a check to be written.
People still selling that bs? Nothing changed. Iran didn't even pretend it was complying.
Israel obtained the proof with little effort.
The media deliberately downplayed it to protect Obama as always.
It was Clinton's North Korea deal all over again.
But now we got idiots like Ben Rhodes who get paid to go on CNN and pretend the Iran deal wasn't a farce for people who don't know anything about it.
I think it's too late for that, but under a different administration I might consider that a viable option. In a vacuum, immediate cessation of hostilities is morally good, yeah. But then again, how do we hold the diplomatic pressure without the military presence? Not possible. That's the path to Israel taking the reigns and a lot of unpredictability with the Saudis. Easily turns into a massive regional (or bigger) war.Of course there is. The US immediately asks for a cessation of hostilities, and high level diplomatic talks.
Not “possibly”, definitely
There were deaths and they attempted to overthrow it, burn it and kill US citizens.
But yeah it’s Always the US
A select group of powerful people met on a yacht and decided that Trump is the best candidate to usher in WW3.It's all based on completely sourced, major reporting. It's called curatorial journalism. Maybe you should look into it.
Great. Massive air attack incoming . No end in sight in regards to leaving this shit.
Fucking sickening