- Joined
- Oct 15, 2009
- Messages
- 7,693
- Reaction score
- 443
Don't worry there are more chances that you become clever than the US nukes Turkey.
US Air Base, Nuclear Bombs Surrounded By Citizens, Troops
- Thread starter GhostZ06
- Start date
Don't worry there are more chances that you become clever than the US nukes Turkey.
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2006
- Messages
- 15,231
- Reaction score
- 0
Some crazy games the elites play.
Turkey Is most likely going to have a civil war.
There are anti turkey government groups That are supported and funded by bigger countries.
Watching a country go into civil war and be able to fund that movement is the game today.
With all the Bengazi hearings, blah blah blah. Hilary Clinton is on tape saying we , he saw, he died and cracks up laughing.
Right there she reveals she was part responsible.
So Clinton and the u.s. fund anti Libyan government groups to start a civil war. Probably a war crime
But what grinds me gears , they take out Gaddafi and they know Libya is a compete mess. A lawless war zone,
And what was the security of the embassy? If the u.s. created that mess, it was absolutely negligent to only have a hand full of troops as security when knowing you just created a war zone.
Now what got people angry, the same groups Obama. Clinton fund to take out Gaddafi,
Well on 911 after being power hungry from taken out Gaddafi, they celebrate 911 by attacking the u.s
embassy.
Same people funded and given weapons to by the u.s., attack the embassy.
That attack was a huge disaster, and Clinton cones out and says the attackers had a good reason, they were upset over a cartoon making fun of Islam.
That alone is beyond unforgettable, to give a reason for the attackers is low, but to lie about a cartoon when it was your funded rebels who did the attacking.
It was amature hour, Clinton didn't secure the embassy because she thought she was working with the rebels.
And she was, but on 911 they celebrated and said fuk you to the u.s. and attacked the embassy.
Turkey Is most likely going to have a civil war.
There are anti turkey government groups That are supported and funded by bigger countries.
Watching a country go into civil war and be able to fund that movement is the game today.
With all the Bengazi hearings, blah blah blah. Hilary Clinton is on tape saying we , he saw, he died and cracks up laughing.
Right there she reveals she was part responsible.
So Clinton and the u.s. fund anti Libyan government groups to start a civil war. Probably a war crime
But what grinds me gears , they take out Gaddafi and they know Libya is a compete mess. A lawless war zone,
And what was the security of the embassy? If the u.s. created that mess, it was absolutely negligent to only have a hand full of troops as security when knowing you just created a war zone.
Now what got people angry, the same groups Obama. Clinton fund to take out Gaddafi,
Well on 911 after being power hungry from taken out Gaddafi, they celebrate 911 by attacking the u.s
embassy.
Same people funded and given weapons to by the u.s., attack the embassy.
That attack was a huge disaster, and Clinton cones out and says the attackers had a good reason, they were upset over a cartoon making fun of Islam.
That alone is beyond unforgettable, to give a reason for the attackers is low, but to lie about a cartoon when it was your funded rebels who did the attacking.
It was amature hour, Clinton didn't secure the embassy because she thought she was working with the rebels.
And she was, but on 911 they celebrated and said fuk you to the u.s. and attacked the embassy.
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2008
- Messages
- 18,174
- Reaction score
- 1,083
What's the meaning your figurative use of "raze them to the ground" then?
Right now you just look like someone that reacted to hyperbole in the same way that you criticize him for.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2016
- Messages
- 11,129
- Reaction score
- 4,472
For starter what the difference between tactical (non strategic) and strategic nuke. What the likley hood of B61 bombs being dropped from anything but a F 15, 16, torpedo or 35 (with the LEP for the B61, Mod B61 12).
Another question is why are these weapons in Turkey and what is their intended use? After all we do have the triad with ICBM, sub and LRB( ALCM used as a standoff weapon) so what are these weapons laying around in turkey, Italy, Belgium and some other places for?
Securing these weapons is more important then human life.
Another question is why are these weapons in Turkey and what is their intended use? After all we do have the triad with ICBM, sub and LRB( ALCM used as a standoff weapon) so what are these weapons laying around in turkey, Italy, Belgium and some other places for?
Securing these weapons is more important then human life.
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2011
- Messages
- 35,945
- Reaction score
- 4,933
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2016
- Messages
- 460
- Reaction score
- 0
I like how all the internet warriors are talking like they're going to do anything other than sit on their couch and watch the news. This forum is so fuckin funny it should be called when pussies think they're tough online.
- Joined
- May 22, 2010
- Messages
- 13,593
- Reaction score
- 2,216
Yes and no. In case of a nuclear war both American and Turkish planes would fly from the same base under American oversight. The nukes are stationed there, the turks would use them but americans have control.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2007
- Messages
- 11,204
- Reaction score
- 3,367
When in doubt, blame your Turkish trouble on the US.
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2005
- Messages
- 7,187
- Reaction score
- 4
They aren't the only country we should just let dissolve. Fuck em.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2007
- Messages
- 11,204
- Reaction score
- 3,367
There are countless Turkish girls that would totally disagree with you. Yep, I got a bunch of friends banging Turkish girls every weekend over there.
Don't hate!!!!!!
