Do you think fhe CEO of a company and doctors have the same responsibility in setting prices and determining eligibility?
You are allowed to be pissed at more than one group of people.
No, they don't have anywhere near the same responsibility in setting prices. That is almost entirely on the doctors/hospitals who feel comfortable charging whatever the fuck they want and racking up the bill because the bill is getting sent to a 3rd party who isn't even there and have to then argue with why they were sent a bill for $16,000 for getting a cut stitched.
It's the same with literally everything. College tuition skyrocketed as soon as it turned into loans and tax dollars and colleges found out there is no ceiling for loading up on bloated administrative staff.
Imagine being born with something like asthma. You can't personal responsibility out of it. Its a pre existing condition and dealing with Dr's is unavoidable and if I don't have my meds I can die , and every once in a while I gotta hit the er. What do you think insurance was like for me pre Obama care ? What do you think it's like now? It's not like I want to have to use healthcare more than you do
Do me and all the others like me deserve to be fucked for life for something totally out of our control ? It's like a disability tax that folks like me can't opt out of.
I'm glad you're healthy and have the luxury of seeing those like me as a burden that blows up your premiums.i would love to be so privileged.
The system from the meds to the hospitals to the doctors to the insurance providers are fucking evil and exploitive and people get their lives ruined by medical issues. It sure as shit doesn't feel like freedom to have that system hold a gun to your head
Single payer is the fix and middle men insurance companies are the biggest part of the problem.
Single payer the dumbest possible "fix". You can't very well complain about insurance negotiating down , then advocate for a system that has many multiples more deaths from care rationing and wait times. It's 17,000/year in Canada, plus an additional 13,500 who are told to kill themselves to save money, and that is with a population of only 40M. UK is has even higher numbers than that who die because of care rationing and wait times.
Asthma is not a major expense. I did have asthma as a kid, which was pre obamacare, and it's a couple hundred bucks/month for an emergency inhaler, a 60 dose advair disk, and doctor's visit every couple months to puff into the little machine with a sailboat on the screen to test your lung fuction and renew your prescriptions. Why should some chick who finds a lump on her tit have to wait 12 months to get it biopsied because you don't like dealing with insurance? The US already does have higher 5 year cancer survival rates than Canada and all of Europe because you don't have to wait months to get a diagnosis.
Diabetes is a bit more expensive, but the same thing applies. If it was just the genetic type I, it's not common enough for that to be a major expense in a group coverage, but like 95% of people with diabetes have type 2, so now it's a huge number and major expense.
"Preexisting condidtion" can mean something you were born with, which should be covered and is covered at a slightly higher rate because of course you use more, but they somehow took that and started lumping in people who don't have a condition they were born with, but just decided to keep their money when they didn't need insurance and then try to sign up once they need it, which is not what insurance is.
And again, we already do have 40% of the country on public healthcare, and it fucking sucks and nobody who doesn't have to be on it wants to be on it. Everybody who advocates for public everything seems to always leave out that we already do have public versions of almost everything and they're not good.