Ultra biased commentary

BigMuffler

Loli is love loli is life!
@Steel
Joined
Mar 24, 2012
Messages
27,240
Reaction score
141
What was that? For the first 2 rounds I was like "wut?" since it looked like a pretty close fight on the feet and they were acting like Vettori was being badly outclassed and going to get killed at any moment lol.
 
He was getting hit and wasn’t landing much back
 
What was that? For the first 2 rounds I was like "wut?" since it looked like a pretty close fight on the feet and they were acting like Vettori was being badly outclassed and going to get killed at any moment lol.
Maybe, you are also being biased.
 
Vettori got piece'd up on the feet, the commentary reflected that because presumably they're not blind.

To his credit Vettori can take a hell of a crack.

Also, whichever judge gave Vettori 2 rounds is incompetent.
 
couldn't agree more. anik was obligated to mention that the significant strikes were very similar. but if i was just listening to the commentary i would have expected to see one guy TOTALLY out classing the other and toying with the other.

horrible imo. not israel's fault.. but the commentary and ufc have obviously made a decision to push and shove this guy down our throats. sickening bias. this fight could have been given to Vettori imo.
 
What was that? For the first 2 rounds I was like "wut?" since it looked like a pretty close fight on the feet and they were acting like Vettori was being badly outclassed and going to get killed at any moment lol.

Yeah the stats speak for themselves.

Commentators were making it sound like Vettori was getting rocked every 5 seconds like it was Conor vs. Brandao or something. The reality is Israel barely outstruck Vettori
 
Yeah they seemed to be expecting a highlight KO from Israel. Instead they got a tough fight which seemed very winnable for Vettori.
 
Last edited:
couldn't agree more. anik was obligated to mention that the significant strikes were very similar. but if i was just listening to the commentary i would have expected to see one guy TOTALLY out classing the other and toying with the other.

horrible imo. not israel's fault.. but the commentary and ufc have obviously made a decision to push and shove this guy down our throats. sickening bias. this fight could have been given to Vettori imo.

Honestly for all the shit he gets, I've found Anik is one of the few dudes in the booth who attempts to stay impartial. I noticed last week (can't remember the fight) Jimmy and Joe were sucking on some fighter's nuts hard and Anik pointed out that the stats were similar
 
Some of the most biased commentary I've heard in a while. They made it seem like this guy was living in the Anderson Silva matrix but he was getting touched repeatedly. Look at his swollen eyes and bruised ego.
 
Vettori was hitting Adesanya just as much and he even took him down twice. Disgusting robbery.
 
I didn't know swinging and missing scores points?
 
This is why some people watch Joe Rogan's broadcasts on mute.
 
I thought it was pretty bad. Definitely working the "Israel coming out on national TV!" narrative.
 
Yea it was bad.If I was only listening to them and not watching I would think Vettori was getting his ass kicked bad.That fight was very close and I thought Vettori barely won 1 and 3..DC and Cruz was sucking Israel's dick from the start.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,254,456
Messages
56,648,018
Members
175,333
Latest member
dubhlinn
Back
Top