Ukraine far right got destroyed in the election

It took Hitler a few tries to get into power. The threat is real. The should probably make sure the fanatics are removed from the country.
 
Hitler started doing good things for his people, like creating 6 million jobs. I can't think of one good action Svoboda did..
 
Tea Party of the UK dominated their elections, and in the Ukraine no one was allowed to vote but the winning side.
 
But, but, but Kyiv is run by fascists. They're all neo-Nazis. How can this be true? There were fewer far-right votes in Ukraine than in both France and the UK? Vladimir Vladimirovich told me that Ukraine was full of Nazis and I believed him!

Oh wait, don't worry, Russian TV is reporting the truth. Yarosh won.

BogCOMVIgAErMlQ.jpg


What? Only utter morons believe blatant Russian propaganda?
 
Last edited:
Both France and England far right wing parties are doing very well and have huge supports now. Anyone who knows history knows when the economic becomes shit white people move to the far right and blame the minorities for everything thats wrong
 
Tea Party of the UK dominated their elections, and in the Ukraine no one was allowed to vote but the winning side.

Lol wut.

On topic this is a good thing yes/no?

On Friday Russian President Vladimir Putin said he would respect the outcome of Ukraine's election.
 
Lol wut.

On topic this is a good thing yes/no?

On Friday Russian President Vladimir Putin said he would respect the outcome of Ukraine's election.

putin has backed down a bit.
russia aint gonna recognize the sham vote in eastern ukraine either
 
Hitler started doing good things for his people, like creating 6 million jobs. I can't think of one good action Svoboda did..

What, exactly, are you referring to here? Because a not-insignifigant amount of that "job creation" involved firing women and firing (later exterminating) minorities (mostly jews) until the nonjew employment rate was where he wanted it.

What I'm really curious about is that 6 million number, though.
 
What, exactly, are you referring to here? Because a not-insignifigant amount of that "job creation" involved firing women and firing (later exterminating) minorities (mostly jews) until the nonjew employment rate was where he wanted it.

What I'm really curious about is that 6 million number, though.

It was easy during his time. You don't count women into the statistics, you remove the jobs from the Jews and give them to your people. Conscription also help the numbers.

Unemployment had fallen from 6 million in 1933 to 300,000 by 1939, still lots of Germans without a job because they were not 'real Germans'.
 
It was easy during his time. You don't count women into the statistics, you remove the jobs from the Jews and give them to your people. Conscription also help the numbers.

Unemployment had fallen from 6 million in 1933 to 300,000 by 1939, still lots of Germans without a job because they were not 'real Germans'.

I'm not sure that eliminating unemployment by
1.) Taking all jobs from minorities and women and giving them to unemployed german men
2.) Not counting the now unemployed minorities as "germans" (or counting women as anything but homemakers)
3.) Conscripting all remaining unemployed germans

... is that great of an accomplishment. It looks a little like brushing all your dirty clothes under the bed, then setting the bed on fire.
 
I'm not sure that eliminating unemployment by
1.) Taking all jobs from minorities and women and giving them to unemployed german men
2.) Not counting the now unemployed minorities as "germans" (or counting women as anything but homemakers)
3.) Conscripting all remaining unemployed germans

... is that great of an accomplishment. It looks a little like brushing all your dirty clothes under the bed, then setting the bed on fire.

I don't agree with it and him, and I don't support what his movement stand for. For him, his people were white Germans, so for them he did a good thing because they needed that job and the money.

I fully support your point of view that it's a very bad thing to do.

The people who got the jobs back in those days knew where the job they got were from, they needed that job so in the end they probably said something like 'better that than nothing'. If I were a jobless German guy living in 1933, I don't know if I would have said 'I don't want the job because it belong to a Jew before, so I will let my family starve to make a point'.
 
But, but, but Kyiv is run by fascists. They're all neo-Nazis. How can this be true? There were fewer far-right votes in Ukraine than in both France and the UK? Vladimir Vladimirovich told me that Ukraine was full of Nazis and I believed him!

Oh wait, don't worry, Russian TV is reporting the truth. Yarosh won.

BogCOMVIgAErMlQ.jpg


What? Only utter morons believe blatant Russian propaganda?

You've been misinterpreting Russian news reports.

And lol @ comparing the electorate-acceptable far-right in France/UK with the crazy fucks in borderland.
 
The Putinbots eating all the Russian media propaganda took a big hit from this. The separatists are brainwashed morons.

Apparently Chechen soldiers arrived in Eastern Ukraine within the last couple of days. I guess they needed reinforcements.
 
Pro-Putin stooges that gleefully repeated Russia's cack-handed propaganda and lies about western-backed neo-Nazis in control of Ukraine are looking even more foolish than before (and that bar was already pretty high).
 
And lol @ comparing the electorate-acceptable far-right in France/UK with the crazy fucks in borderland.

If you were to believe Russian propaganda, Ukraine was full of those 'crazy fucks' and yet they polled below 1%. Even the extreme far-right did far better than that in many EU nations.

You've been misinterpreting Russian news reports.

Prove it.
 
Both France and England far right wing parties are doing very well and have huge supports now. Anyone who knows history knows when the economic becomes shit white people move to the far right and blame the minorities for everything thats wrong

It doesn't help that Muslim clerics in the UK act like total douchebags and cry "shariah for everyone" all the time. The guy who killed Lee Rigby was a numerous rallies for Choudery, a Muslim radical. It polarized the right wingers. It also made the "on the fence" people start siding with them cause they realized that liberal progressives preaching "multiculturalism" haven't a clue. Multiculturalism only works when all the cultures believe in it. It's painfully obvious that vast amount of Muslims, not just the few radicals, support shariah, a anti-multicultural theocratic system of law.

But as for Ukraine. I'm not sure if this election changes anything. Russian speaking Ukrainians are already being ostracized. Some of it by their own doing. And some of it being done to them by right wing nationalist. As soon as the overthrow of their elected Prime Minister happened, the Russian Ukrainians ran to Putin and Russia for help. Crimea was the easiest to fall cause the territory itself was almost a separated autonomous region filled with primarily Russian sympathizers. In Eastern Ukraine the lines are more blurred.

I still see eastern Ukraine as an eventual separate state. EU and US won't like it, but tough tooties. They don't have to live there. Russian speaking Ukrainians do. And they should have the right to choose what they want for themselves. Even if it's running to a sinister man like Putin.

Honestly, after reading the story of East Timor, among many other atrocities the US has been involved in, I don't know who's more sinister anymore.
 
So... are the people winning elections the pro-Putin's or the anti-Putin's?
 
Back
Top