International UK schoolchildren taught that Britain was originally a black country and that black people built Stonehenge

Croo67

Brown Belt
@Brown
Joined
Dec 21, 2015
Messages
4,383
Reaction score
4,268
Schoolchildren are being taught that black people built Stonehenge as part of 'decolonised' history curriculums, a report has revealed.

The claim is made in the book 'Brilliant Black British History', which is used in schools across the country. Written by Atinuke, a Nigerian-born British author, the book states that 'Britain was a black country for more than 7,000 years before white people came'.

 
That's good. I'm glad kids are finally being taught the truth.

Only a truly explosive and athletic group of people are building Stonehenge properly. Not a bunch of cans with bad teeth that can't cook or lift heavy in the gym.

Really? So where's the wonderful structures in sub-Saharan Africa?
 
I see a pay wall so dont know what the article says.
It seems to be the same book and author but an article from 23

 
i dont see the problem with it, its not like most history taught isnt bullshit to begin with
 
Schoolchildren are being taught that black people built Stonehenge as part of 'decolonised' history curriculums, a report has revealed.

The claim is made in the book 'Brilliant Black British History', which is used in schools across the country. Written by Atinuke, a Nigerian-born British author, the book states that 'Britain was a black country for more than 7,000 years before white people came'.

This is quite pathetic....its based on a distortion of this finding.



Then twisted for woke political gain. Btw he wasn't a sub saharan Nigerian and attempts to project back modern concepts of race to create some kind of "black vs white" narrative going back 8000 years are just ridiculous.
 
Last edited:
This is quite pathetic....its based on a distortion of this finding.



Then twisted for woke political gain. Btw he wasn't a sub saharan Nigerian and attempts to project back modern concepts of race to create some kind of "black vs white" narrative going back 8000 years are just ridiculous.


It hasn't been proven that the earliest Brits had skin that dark though (or that they even had relatively dark skin). In the end, it's all part of the mass immigration agenda. They want white people to believe Europe doesn't belong to them; that they have no claim to it; that they have no homeland... so in other words, they don't belong anywhere in this world. It's pure dehumanisation.

The usual crowd will of course gaslight and pretend it's only about 'treating people equally'.
 
Really? So where's the wonderful structures in sub-Saharan Africa?

Mostly destroyed but still the GOAT. Sounds like someone reps the bar and needs to visit the dentist.

h1056i2.jpg

Musa-I-of-Mali-Great-Mosque-Timbuktu-1327.jpg
 
It hasn't been proven that the earliest Brits had skin that dark though (or that they even had relatively dark skin). In the end, it's all part of the mass immigration agenda. They want white people to believe Europe doesn't belong to them; that they have no claim to it; that they have no homeland... so in other words, they don't belong anywhere in this world. It's pure dehumanisation.

The usual crowd will of course gaslight and pretend it's only about 'treating people equally'.
It doesn't matter even if he was that dark. It doesn't make him suddenly 'a black person' as it is understood today, race is more than skin color. He was a European and modern whites share some of his ancestry going back 10,000 years on the continent.
The problem is it can be manipulated to tell a different narrative but that book is one of the most laughably bad atttempts I have seen at it.
 
Back
Top