- Joined
- Feb 1, 2009
- Messages
- 43,065
- Reaction score
- 10,621
Did they have some camera that locked on and kept this in precisely the same position in the frame? If so I would expect it to be in the crosshairs. When I see something stay in position in frame like that I immediately suspect that it is an artifact of the camera lens or something on the lens.
F
franklinstower
Guest
http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/tucker-carlsons-sex-crazed-pandas?full=1
As the segment aired, people commented on the fact that Carlson was reporting on "sex-crazed pandas" and not the FBI raid on the office and hotel room of President Donald Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen, which virtually every other news outlet had reported.[2][3][4]
...
That night, Academy Award-winning screenwriter and the director of the American comedy film Anchorman tweeted[8] that the segment was very similar to one in his film. He wrote, "Amazing. We made this joke in Anchorman about fluff news and he’s actually doing it (to cover for Trump)."
Visual evidence of aliens or evidence of something for which we have no explanation off-hand?
If you find video like in the TS with radar and eye witness corroberation compelling and you take the statements from the professionals involved seriously then it is not much of a stretch. Add to that governments that state regular sightings.
The idea that they are too expensive to mass produce falls apart very quickly when you take into account the sheer number and variety of UFO's that are reported even if you only take into account the most credible sightings. Why build so many different shapes and sizes and types all requiring new engineering and testing for something so expensive?
The variety of shape and size actually strongly suggests mass production. Once that is taken into account the question becomes "Why hide this mass producible tech from humanity". Its hard to come up with a reason other than they cannot explain the nature of the technology without revealing something quite objectionable to us.
Ive been looking into this for quite a while-- mainly due to my own sighing and it does seem to me as if this is not human tech.
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2013
- Messages
- 7,736
- Reaction score
- 12
Why do people always jump on the crazy, alien, extraterrestrial bus when someone says UFO? The word has become synonymous with 'alien spaceships'. UFO stands for Unidentified Flying Object. It's "unidentified" meaning you don't know what the fuck it is. Always shake my head when people say "I don't believe in UFO's".
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2009
- Messages
- 61,008
- Reaction score
- 359
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2014
- Messages
- 17,874
- Reaction score
- 4,067
You didn't answer my question. You are assuming the source of this technology is alien and you simply have no evidence of that. Anyone who presumes to know things they could not possibly know lacks credibility at best and is crazy at worst.
UFO sightings are not very common and for all you know all of these "sightings" are from the same small number of phenomenon or technology in existence that produces them. If it's the type of technology you are suggesting, the amount of energy you would need to harness to make those types of maneuvers would probably be costly.
F
franklinstower
Guest
I have already expressed why I think that it simply cannot be from some small number or phenomenon or tech. The evidence just doesnt fit that model in my opinion. As far as thinking they are aliens rather than just UFO's that is the conclusion that I have come to after reading a TON of accounts and after seeing one for myself. I am not saying this is a fact. I am saying this is what I think it is.
Out of the two of us you are the only one who thinks he is right for sure and the other guy needs to be corrected. I can see your point and respect it. I just happen to disagree after having really looked into it is all.
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2016
- Messages
- 13,367
- Reaction score
- 6
If an alien species had the technology to travel through space so fast they could reach earth, the first contact would be so much not an UFO sighting reported on Fox News.
F
franklinstower
Guest
I think I figured out what you mean.
I guess it depends on their motives. Using the term first contact assumes that is even an interest of theirs.
What if they value something entirely different than anything that can be put into terms such as public contact with human leadership? What if what they are interested in is not human contact at all? Or if yes, something to do with individuals irrespective of governing bodies. What if they have no government themselves and so do not value that in any way?
Last edited by a moderator:
F
franklinstower
Guest
TS watches CNN for real news.
Didn't CNN recently do a segment promoting the virtues of the swinger lifestyle?
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2016
- Messages
- 13,367
- Reaction score
- 6
Well, if they have technology that powerful we are literally plants compared to them.
F
franklinstower
Guest
If you watched the FOX video then it is self evident that they are taking it seriously. Are you actually denying that? Did you even watch it?
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2013
- Messages
- 7,629
- Reaction score
- 2,003
Here's the always interesting Michio Kaku talking about the latest ufo sightings on his podcast.
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2013
- Messages
- 7,629
- Reaction score
- 2,003
And here's the always great, REAL, UFO![with Michael Schenker!]
