UFO on FOX news?

F

franklinstower

Guest
Check this out from FOX news. I am quite impressed with the lack of mockery and the degree to which this story is taken seriously. Thoughts?


 
Last edited by a moderator:
You have provided 0 evidence to show that this story hasn't been mocked, nor have you provided any evidence that it has been taken seriously. Unless you are speaking in terms of Sherdog. In which case I withdraw my comment.
 
didnt-read.gif


Seriously. Who watches fox news? There’s like 134 people that watch fox and cnn, and all of them are retarded.
 
I know FOX does not have the best reputation for being a source of real news BUT check this out. I am quite impressed with the lack of mockery and the degree to which this story is taken seriously. Thoughts?




FOX is the only reputable news source.
 
FOX is the only reputable news source.


Ok fine but watch the video. I personally have never seen this subject covered seriously by any main stream news source. I mean that. This is a bit of an about face on a subject that has deserved good coverage for a long time.
 
Ok fine but watch the video. I personally have never seen this subject covered seriously by any main stream news source. I mean that. This is a bit of an about face on a subject that has deserved good coverage for a long time.
I am still skeptical. I say the most likely scenario is that it is human-made technology that is classified and too expensive to mass produce.
 
I am still skeptical. I say the most likely scenario is that it is human-made technology that is classified and too expensive to mass produce.

Secret human tech seems very unlikely to me and that is what most scientists say who have looked into it. New tech like this doesn't just manifest itself out of a vacuum. Where is the precursor to this tech? We dont have anything like what is reported here in this video. Its not jet propulsion of any kind. Why would anything like this exist and not be mass produced?

If it is human tech then I think it is bought or traded from extra terrestrials or reverse engineered from a crashed UFO.

Prop to FOX news for covering this when to do so often means absolute mockery.
 
I’ve watched Mark Levin on Hannity and it’s on FOX. Levin is as real and reputable as they come.
 
i have seen UFOs.

What annoys me is that those fuckers out there won't show themselves. I would vote one of those to take over leadership of our planet. I bet we're lab monkeys to them.
 
Why would anything like this exist and not be mass produced?

Because it is too expensive to mass produce...

If it is human tech then I think it is bought or traded from extra terrestrials or reverse engineered from a crashed UFO.

You're really going out on a limb here. You have no evidence of extraterrestrials and yet you are stating it is probably the explanation for this tech? If we are going to entertain the possibility that extraterrestrial life managed to harness incredible sums of energy to travel from one solar system to another, why don't we entertain other improbable explanations as well? Maybe they are future humans traveling back in time to re-engineer the timeline. Maybe they are people from another dimension. Maybe it is another supernatural (or natural) occurrence that we just haven't thought up yet.

How can you presume to know something you do not know?
 
i have seen UFOs.

What annoys me is that those fuckers out there won't show themselves. I would vote one of those to take over leadership of our planet. I bet we're lab monkeys to them.


I have also seen a UFO. I really think this kind of coverage is unique and if it continues marks a real shift in consciousness around the whole subject of UFO's. This is a game changer.
 
Because it is too expensive to mass produce...



You're really going out on a limb here. You have no evidence of extraterrestrials and yet you are stating it is probably the explanation for this tech? If we are going to entertain the possibility that extraterrestrial life managed to harness incredible sums of energy to travel from one solar system to another, why don't we entertain other improbable explanations as well? Maybe they are future humans traveling back in time to re-engineer the timeline. Maybe they are people from another dimension. Maybe it is another supernatural (or natural) occurrence that we just haven't thought up yet.

How can you presume to know something you do not know?

There is video evidence right on the posted vid. There is A LOT of that kind of evidence from really credible multiple witnesses corroborated by radar. That is a lot of evidence. Also I have seen one myself so that kind of seals the deal for me personally.


You said "Maybe they are future humans traveling back in time to re-engineer the timeline. Maybe they are people from another dimension. Maybe it is another supernatural (or natural) occurrence that we just haven't thought up yet".

These are all ideas and theories that are taken pretty seriously within the UFO community and have been fleshed out in many discussions and threads even on this site. They are all possible.
 
I have also seen a UFO. I really think this kind of coverage is unique and if it continues marks a real shift in consciousness around the whole subject of UFO's. This is a game changer.
I'm Spartacus
 
I know FOX does not have the best reputation for being a source of real news BUT check this out. I am quite impressed with the lack of mockery and the degree to which this story is taken seriously. Thoughts?




images


http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/tucker-carlsons-sex-crazed-pandas?full=1

As the segment aired, people commented on the fact that Carlson was reporting on "sex-crazed pandas" and not the FBI raid on the office and hotel room of President Donald Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen, which virtually every other news outlet had reported.[2][3][4]

...

That night, Academy Award-winning screenwriter and the director of the American comedy film Anchorman tweeted[8] that the segment was very similar to one in his film. He wrote, "Amazing. We made this joke in Anchorman about fluff news and he’s actually doing it (to cover for Trump)."
 
images


http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/tucker-carlsons-sex-crazed-pandas?full=1

As the segment aired, people commented on the fact that Carlson was reporting on "sex-crazed pandas" and not the FBI raid on the office and hotel room of President Donald Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen, which virtually every other news outlet had reported.[2][3][4]

...

That night, Academy Award-winning screenwriter and the director of the American comedy film Anchorman tweeted[8] that the segment was very similar to one in his film. He wrote, "Amazing. We made this joke in Anchorman about fluff news and he’s actually doing it (to cover for Trump)."
<PlusJuan>
 
I have also seen a UFO. I really think this kind of coverage is unique and if it continues marks a real shift in consciousness around the whole subject of UFO's. This is a game changer.


What did you see?

Do you think the government keeps it low key because they don't want to lose control ?
 
There is video evidence right on the posted vid. There is A LOT of that kind of evidence from really credible multiple witnesses corroborated by radar. That is a lot of evidence. Also I have seen one myself so that kind of seals the deal for me personally.
Visual evidence of aliens or evidence of something for which we have no explanation off-hand? :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top