As a fan, I don’t care. If I was a promoter, there’s no way in hell that I’d book that. Why risk having your champ beaten with no long term payoff?
Everyone is talking about how this fight is bad for the UFC, as if they're UFC employees. What about the fans? This would be a true superfight (maybe the biggest ever) for true fans.
I think there are ways to do it. They can't force him to fight, but they can force him to earn like only 50k for the first and 1.5million on the second fight or something like that. They won't do it, but I think it's legally possible to construct something.I'm not a lawyer, but I suspect a contract like that wouldn't hold up in court, because the defense would argue you can't force someone to risk their health (ie get into the cage) if they don't want to. Probably the best they could do is take a million off of any fight GSP did after that if he ever fought again.
Maybe not in that exact same construction, but there are ways to make it very shitty not to fight again. Perhaps pay him only on completion of 2 fights or something like that.i dont think thats legal.
anyhow.. ufc would NEVER make this fight unless khabib lost. gsp is no longer a company man. he fights every now and then, and khabib is a great russian/middle eastern person and mma is huge there at the moment.
You mean like allowing your 2 division champion to go get embarrassed in a boxing match?As a fan, I don’t care. If I was a promoter, there’s no way in hell that I’d book that. Why risk having your champ beaten with no long term payoff?
Lol that didn’t turn out as bad as it could’ve, but yeah. I suppose it was a shitload of money for the UFC and a lot of exposure. It’s not horrible because it really wasn’t Conor’s sport, but I do think it makes MMA look bad.You mean like allowing your 2 division champion to go get embarrassed in a boxing match?
“I know Khabib wanted to have that fight,” Georges St-Pierre told ESPN. “I want it, but the thing is, if you look from the UFC’s side, I think it’s normal if I put myself in their shoes. They didn’t want to take the risk of me winning the title and then after vacating again.
"I didn’t even want it for the title, I would rather do it not for a title. For me, it was because I considered Khabib, right now, the best fighter in the world, and he wanted to fight me as well so I thought it was a good fan fight.
“They had other plans for Khabib and I understand that. They had a lot to lose and if they invest into that fight and their investment goes out after, it’s not a good move.
“In a way, I could take that as a compliment because maybe they saw me as a threat for them. That means maybe they thought I could win the fight. If they let me fight him, it’s because they think [Khabib] would have lost.”
Just make the fight at 165. If khabib loses... Well he lost to the bigger man. The same shit someone else does whenever they lost at 170.
He's right though. If the UFC thought Khabib would win, they'd let the fight happen so Khabib could steal some of GSP's clout.
Dana always shits on boxing and promoters who they say fighters are being protected and whatnot or fights don’t happen when they’re suppose to. So, this is the same thing, is it not? Protecting Khabib.