UFC slow to remove Palhares from website

RogerD

Brown Belt
@Brown
Joined
Mar 25, 2011
Messages
3,699
Reaction score
766
Just noticed despite all this, UFC hasn't removed Palhares from their website?

Are they usually slow with that sort of update? I suppose the web traffic due to controversy to doesn't hurt.
 
Tito is still on the website; don't expect Palhares to be removed anytime soon.
 
He's been left there cause Dana is going to reinstate him.
 
Just noticed despite all this, UFC hasn't removed Palhares from their website?

Are they usually slow with that sort of update? I suppose the web traffic due to controversy to doesn't hurt.

There's a long line of people between Dana for example, and the latte-drinking tech-guy who actually does the updates on the site. Besides, it's not hurting anyone. If the UFC thought it hurt their rep bad enough, they'd take it down faster, but that's not the case here.
 
He's been left there cause Dana is going to reinstate him.

Your adhesion to Palhares nuts is out of this world....tip of the hat for the loyalty...as misguided as it is.
 
I think at this point calling Palhares stupid is like calling Hammil "def".
 
Like Palhares, the UFC just can't let go
 
Your adhesion to Palhares nuts is out of this world....tip of the hat for the loyalty...as misguided as it is.

I'm no fairweather fanboy or wagon hopper.

I'll always be a fan of Toquinho.

Win or lose.
 
Very fitting way to cut Palahres. Get it done fast in public but also dont release right away.
 
That website is horrible
 
Some of the posters in here hit the nail on the head.

I don't see how it could be considered fighter bashing if it's true. He's also not currently an active fighter...
 
I'm no fairweather fanboy or wagon hopper.

I'll always be a fan of Toquinho.

Win or lose.

As I mentioned, and this time without any jokes...loyalty is admirable.
 
you're implying something TS what is it
 
Back
Top