- Joined
- Dec 16, 2015
- Messages
- 12,094
- Reaction score
- 1,201
UFC 196 all because of Holly Holmes Holms Holm.
Well, that's fair enough, though I'd argue I'd rather have 4+ million people over the age of 18 watching my TV event than 10+ million people under 18 watching it, since the ones under 18 probably aren't buying what my sponsors are selling.
I would argue that isn't true.
WWE makes a killing in merchandise. Way more than the UFC ever will. Why? All the parents who buy stuff for their kids.
But, Raw typically doesn't do 4 million plus viewers. I don't think they've had consistent numbers like that since the Monday Night Wars.
Got some proof???Not after that loss she won't
Got some proof???
I skipped the main event. I figured it would be weak ass kick boxing, and I am tired from the new baby I have.
I compared UFC on FOX to an episode of WWE RAW
needless to say WWE RAW had better ratings
embarrassing if I do say so myself