- Joined
- Nov 18, 2012
- Messages
- 7,392
- Reaction score
- 119
So much hate and discontent about the watered down cards, too many shows, etc etc.
Got me thinking, what is the big difference between the UFC as it stands today...and years ago all these same fighters were spread out over 7 organizations.
Did all the supposed hardcore fans really only watch the UFC the whole time? The UFC absorbed all the other orgs and is putting on more fights containing all those fighters from the other orgs.....but yet people are yearning for startup leagues, or some other structure. But why? What's the difference what banner the fighters fight under? Isn't it easier for them all to be in the UFC? People complain that they don't know when shits on or what channel.....well how the hell did you keep track of 7-8 different orgs before? And now you can't keep track of Fox, FS1/2 and fightpass? None of this makes any sense to me.
An interesting stat mentioned by one of the reporters at the UFN44 post fight press conference was that UFN44 doubled the attendance and the gate of WEC43 that was also held in san Antonio. The WEC event was headlined by a title fight between Donald Cerrone and Benson Henderson. The WEC event was also not televised a lot of places in the US because of the DirecTV / VS feud.
The ufn44 did roughly 10,000 tickets and a 750k gate. UFN43 did a gate of 8000 tickets for 1.04 million. A 1.75 million dollar gate day for the UFC. These just don't seem like signs to me that the UFC is in an uncontrolled downward spiral. Why do the attendance and gates of these shows not correlate with the hate and discontent for these shows on Sherdog?
Cub Swanson was on the prelim card of WEC44, which did 1,835 tickets for $131k. Cub was also the co-main of WEC50 which did 1,861 tickets for 275k. Cub was also on the prelim card for WEC 52..i can't find any gate numbers for it, but given that Cub was the second fight of the night, it would be a safe assumption that he didn't have much to do with the crowd draw for the Faber headlined event.
But isn't the fact that Cub is now headlining a card that just did 10,000 for 750k proof that the UFC is in fact building new stars and promoting new fighters? 4 years ago he's on the prelim and now he's pulling in 750k gates.
So many people here often dream of the pride days....but why did the Pride PPV's in 2006-2007 that were held and promoted in the US only do 30k buys, while the UFC did a million buys 2 months later. So how come the number of pride fan boys here doesn't correlate to the ppv buys number? Do most people just lie that they were watching pride at the time?
Or is the simple answer to both of these situations that the "voice" of Sherdog has absolutely nothing to do with the landscape of MMA in the real world?
Is it possible to call the UFC watered down, but watch WSOF, Bellator, OneFC and think they aren't watered down? Do you want to watch Askren vs #200 WW in the world?
Got me thinking, what is the big difference between the UFC as it stands today...and years ago all these same fighters were spread out over 7 organizations.
Did all the supposed hardcore fans really only watch the UFC the whole time? The UFC absorbed all the other orgs and is putting on more fights containing all those fighters from the other orgs.....but yet people are yearning for startup leagues, or some other structure. But why? What's the difference what banner the fighters fight under? Isn't it easier for them all to be in the UFC? People complain that they don't know when shits on or what channel.....well how the hell did you keep track of 7-8 different orgs before? And now you can't keep track of Fox, FS1/2 and fightpass? None of this makes any sense to me.
An interesting stat mentioned by one of the reporters at the UFN44 post fight press conference was that UFN44 doubled the attendance and the gate of WEC43 that was also held in san Antonio. The WEC event was headlined by a title fight between Donald Cerrone and Benson Henderson. The WEC event was also not televised a lot of places in the US because of the DirecTV / VS feud.
The ufn44 did roughly 10,000 tickets and a 750k gate. UFN43 did a gate of 8000 tickets for 1.04 million. A 1.75 million dollar gate day for the UFC. These just don't seem like signs to me that the UFC is in an uncontrolled downward spiral. Why do the attendance and gates of these shows not correlate with the hate and discontent for these shows on Sherdog?
Cub Swanson was on the prelim card of WEC44, which did 1,835 tickets for $131k. Cub was also the co-main of WEC50 which did 1,861 tickets for 275k. Cub was also on the prelim card for WEC 52..i can't find any gate numbers for it, but given that Cub was the second fight of the night, it would be a safe assumption that he didn't have much to do with the crowd draw for the Faber headlined event.
But isn't the fact that Cub is now headlining a card that just did 10,000 for 750k proof that the UFC is in fact building new stars and promoting new fighters? 4 years ago he's on the prelim and now he's pulling in 750k gates.
So many people here often dream of the pride days....but why did the Pride PPV's in 2006-2007 that were held and promoted in the US only do 30k buys, while the UFC did a million buys 2 months later. So how come the number of pride fan boys here doesn't correlate to the ppv buys number? Do most people just lie that they were watching pride at the time?
Or is the simple answer to both of these situations that the "voice" of Sherdog has absolutely nothing to do with the landscape of MMA in the real world?
Is it possible to call the UFC watered down, but watch WSOF, Bellator, OneFC and think they aren't watered down? Do you want to watch Askren vs #200 WW in the world?
Last edited: