Rumored UFC Has Changed Some of Its Contract Practices

avenue94

Gold Belt
@Gold
Joined
Aug 2, 2011
Messages
18,171
Reaction score
17,018
Based on John Nash's reporting, the UFC has made one significant and one less significant contract change since 2017. It's unclear if these were piecemeal changes or across the board, but if something came of the antitrust lawsuit, it's this.

Cliffs: UFC contracts appear to have 5-year maximum lengths now and also fighters can have 1 min of their fight footage for the gram. You'll have your first group of fighters automatically becoming free agents next year, likely including GSP.

1. The big one is that some UFC contracts since the July 1, 2017 have a 5-year maximum, compared to prior when contracts could be frozen in perpetuity when a fighter sits out or retires. There are a few important reasons the UFC would do that when they did
-The class period for the antitrust lawsuit goes through June 2017, this change would make it harder for someone to expand the class period (and thus WME's exposure to litigation and damages), which is what CB Dolloway and Kajan Johnson are doing now.
-It's arguably a tacit admission from WME that the perpetual nature of UFC contracts combined with how broad they are wouldn't survive a court challenge and would probably be deemed illegal.
-Why a 5-year maximum? This is the limit several states put on contracts between boxers and managers/promoters (NJ and California, 4 years in Nevada). That's in addition to several states having mandatory sunset provisions on nearly all contracts (California's is 7 years, for example).

2. The more minor one is fighters now can be given 3 20 second clips of fight footage for them to promote themselves on social media. It has to be non-commercial, however, so other promotions or advertisers/sponsors can't use the footage. Part of the UFC's reason for hoarding all fight footage and purchasing Pride's library was to make it harder for other promotions to compete; sure, you can sign former UFC fighters, but you won't have any good promo footage to use of their career when you do.
 
2. The more minor one is fighters now can be given 3 20 second clips of fight footage for them to promote themselves on social media. It has to be non-commercial, however, so other promotions or advertisers/sponsors can't use the footage.
Wow, a fighter gets to keep 3 20 seconds of clips of their own fights. So generous of the UFC
<JackieThumbsUp>
 
Just drop venom rebook and all other shit.
Let fighters get their own sponsors. EVERYONE wins.
Not the UFC, so there's your problem haha.
This would've been handy for Nick Diaz years ago. Wish the UFC didn't steal his prime years and his love for fighting. Really is a sad story. Nick was so fun in SF.
Diaz could have actually sued to break out of his contract if he waited until the end of this year. California caps contracts at 7 years. Guess he figured it wasn't worth the legal fight, so hopefully he's happy.
Probably clips of them between rounds
I can't wait to see whatever fighter is currently on the UFC's shit list get 3 20 second clips of them getting knocked out or otherwise not looking good, just as a good ol Joe Silva kind of fuck you.
 
So this has been in the contracts for 4 years....interesting
Yeah. Word trickles out of the mma grapevine slowly, not to mention sharing contracts with media is still illegal. There's a reason the UFC has that clause in it and why Izzy in his video on how he spent his first million said "I allegedly made ___ dollars for this fight." Legal or not, that kind of language has a chilling effect.
 
Yeah. Word trickles out of the mma grapevine slowly, not to mention sharing contracts with media is still illegal. There's a reason the UFC has that clause in it and why Izzy in his video on how he spent his first million said "I allegedly made ___ dollars for this fight." Legal or not, that kind of language has a chilling effect.
Which is bullshit when Dana said Fighters don't say how much they make because they don't want leeches coming for their money, when he knows that there is a clause that sharing contract details is illegal.
 
Just drop venom rebook and all other shit.
Let fighters get their own sponsors. EVERYONE wins.
Best thing to do is keep the outfit/uniform sponsors but allow a few sponsors with a specific sizing and location on the shorts so it still looks uniformed. That's always been the best move to make to make both sides happy. UFC still gets sponsor contracts from the likes of Reebok/Venum and the fighters can add extra sponsors to help them make more money.
 
Yeah. Word trickles out of the mma grapevine slowly, not to mention sharing contracts with media is still illegal. There's a reason the UFC has that clause in it and why Izzy in his video on how he spent his first million said "I allegedly made ___ dollars for this fight." Legal or not, that kind of language has a chilling effect.
No Dana has said there is no gag order on their pay and fighters can talk about it freely if they wanted to. He does that because he just doesn't want to disclose his real amount.
 
No Dana has said there is no gag order on their pay and fighters can talk about it freely if they wanted to. He does that because he just doesn't want to disclose his real amount.
The Eddie UFC contract tho had the clause that they couldn't disclose payments and contract details, so I can't imagine why the UFC would have changed it since then

Dana has also lied about many things over the years and no one calls him out since they would lose press priviledges for UFC events, ala Ariel
 
The Eddie UFC contract tho had the clause that they couldn't disclose payments and contract details, so I can't imagine why the UFC would have changed it since then

Dana has also lied about many things over the years and no one calls him out since they would lose press priviledges for UFC events, ala Ariel
Could've changed in the future due to antitrust lawsuit like the addition of time frame contracts. Most likely changes were made during WME era.
 
No Dana has said there is no gag order on their pay and fighters can talk about it freely if they wanted to. He does that because he just doesn't want to disclose his real amount.
I would wager that the clause is still in contracts. Whether or not Dana's verbal remark (he's on legal record saying that his statements as a promoter are not to be taken literally) is enough to nullify that clause is unclear, but that clause's existence still has a chilling effect. That's the point of a lot of UFC/mma contracts, doesn't matter if something is illegal or enforceable, it's there to scare off fighters from challenging it.

Also keep in mind the UFC has extensively lobbied athletic commission to not disclose purses anymore. Why would they do that but remove the language making that same payment information confidential?
That's always been the best move to make to make both sides happy. UFC still gets sponsor contracts from the likes of Reebok/Venum and the fighters can add extra sponsors to help them make more money.
It won't fly, the UFC purposefully killed the sponsor market by levying a sponsor tax. And the outfitting deals aren't there to make money, they are there so the UFC can guarantee exclusively to sponsors on the cage and broadcast. For example, a fighter would never be allowed to rock a Nike patch on their fight kit.
Could've changed in the future due to antitrust lawsuit like the addition of time frame contracts. Most likely changes were made during WME era.
Unless it's expclitly mentioned to be changed, I would lean toward assuming it's still there.
 
Just drop venom rebook and all other shit.
Let fighters get their own sponsors. EVERYONE wins.

Fucking this. UFC doesn’t have to pay fighters more, and all the fighters make more money.

How is this not a win win?

Greedy UFC can take 15% of fighters sponsorships or something if they wanted and fighters would still come out ahead.
 
Back
Top