UFC fighter with the most misleading record?

Just going through some fighter records and I'd have to say John Hathaway has the most misleading record. (17-2) He's a decent fighter but nowhere near what his record implies. He's a prelim fighter at best and as soon as he gets step a up, (dong, Pyle) he gets beat. On the other hand, Matt Brown who has a rather unimpressive record (19-11) is on the verge of a title shot and is a straight up killer. Who would you say has the most misleading records in the UFC?

 

With how he's performing right now, Michael Johnson doesn't look like he's 15-8, and definitely didn't look 12-8 going into the Lauzon fight.

 

Those numbers mean very little without looking at the caliber of the opponents and the career trajectory of the fighter.

 

Mark Hunt 9-8

BJ Penn 16-9-2

 

BJ Penn
Guy Mezger

 

Machida 21-4

Should be 18-7

 

BJ
Randy
Matt "MF'ing' Brown

 

Shogun

His UFC record is 6-7 but in my mind it's

7-5-1

Count it!

 

Robbie Lawler

 

Da Bones: 20-1

That 1 loss irks me!

 

wandys UFC record.......Hes worse than it actually is.....

 

Jon Jones, he should still be undefeated.

 

Matt Brown

19-11

 

Hacran Dias 21-2

 

Damn you either HATE machida or have no idea what you are watching... he should be 23-2

...

 

I think his record should be

22-3

His only losses should be to Shogun twice and once to Jones.

 

Randy coutures was a bit misleading

 

His record is 5-7 and you think Wandy is worse than that?

 

Machida is my favourite fighter. I agree he should've got the nod against rampage and Davis.

But he shouldve dropped the first shogun fight so maybe 22-3