- Joined
- Dec 27, 2013
- Messages
- 3,843
- Reaction score
- 137
I think yes but wonder what you all think?
A street fight also has the added issue of legit fear; in the octagon you know the ref will save you. I would put my money on the MMA fighter 95% of the time in a street fight, but they would be out of their element.
A striker would fair better in my opinion. Especially if more than one person is involved.
And tweeted the whole thing with glee, thanking Bloomberg for ensuring guns are banned in NYC. Beat up one guy, the other ran off. So Renzo followed him, choked him out, and then gave the guy a raccoon mask while he was out.Didn't Renzo Gracie beat two muggers in a street fight or something?
This.So you think 1 in 20 times a UFC fighter would lose a street fight? Lolololol! If we are assuming it's a one on one fight among the same sex they wouldn't lose more than 1 in 1000 against your average person regardless of weight class.
This.
Someone who trains every day in multiple areas of fighting as a profession is pretty much a given to dust your untrained street joe, and very quickly.
Khabilov is the last person I would want to fight on a concrete surface....
Young Rampage would be homicide.Prime Rampage would be scary