- Joined
- Sep 17, 2005
- Messages
- 21,191
- Reaction score
- 22,359
UPDATE:
More: http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2015/8/1...reebok-comments-had-nothing-to-do-with-firing
UPDATE: The UFC has responded to Bloody Elbow's request for clarification on Epstein's comments with the following statement:
"Jacob ‘Stitch' Duran has not been banned from UFC and he is free to corner any athlete if they choose to pay for his services. We want to provide other cutmen the opportunity to work UFC events. UFC certainly respects Duran's experience and accomplishments as a cutman, and wishes him the best. We will not comment about the other reasons that lead to the ending of his independent contractor agreement with UFC, other than to say it had nothing to do with his comments about Reebok."
All of which makes Lawrence Epstein's recent comments about Duran's firing to the International Business Times seem like an especially dramatic shift from a story that had been pretty well accepted and spoken to by all parties involved:
"Unequivocally, his comments had nothing to do with him getting let go. I can't be more firm on that. There are a variety of reasons that he was let go, but nothing to do with his comments on Reebok," Epstein said. "He's trying to paint this thing as, he said some stuff about Reebok and as a result, he was let go. It's just not true. That's not the reason why he was let go. I can't be more clear on that."
Epstein's comments came as part of a larger story on the influence of sponsorship money in low paying sports, a landscape where the UFC is currently front and center alongside USA men's track and field.
More: http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2015/8/1...reebok-comments-had-nothing-to-do-with-firing
Last edited: