UFC 202 IS that good.

McgreGOATsLeft

alone
@red
Joined
Mar 29, 2016
Messages
8,041
Reaction score
5
Conor/Nate 2.

Rumble/Glover.

Cerrone/Story.

Means/Strickland.

Garbrandt/Mizugaki.

Larkin/Magny.

How could anybody possibly say that this card isn't very good?
The main card should be over the top exciting to the say the very least. Of course it is a bit of a bummer that Maia/Condit was moved to UFC on Fox 21 but saying that this card isn't very good on paper is just a little ridiculous IMO.

image.jpeg

Thoughts on 202 as a whole?
 
Last edited:
I'll be there with bells on. :)
 
It's not 200 Il tell you that. I expected much more to be honest. I figured we would have at least one title on the line. The loss of the Condit fight makes it less interesting too. Having said that I'm more excited for the main event than any fight on 200. Not so much the rest of the card.
 
I feel like it's good but they could have given Garbrandt a better fight.
 
Very solid card
It'll worth the $$$
 
Casuals and Hardcores...

DILLON_predator.gif
 
It's not 200 Il tell you that. I expected much more to be honest. I figured we would have at least one title on the line. The loss of the Condit fight makes it less interesting too. Having said that I'm more excited for the main event than any fight on 200. Not so much the rest of the card.
200 was a terrible, terrible card aside from Cain fight and the prelims
 
I feel like it's good but they could have given Garbrandt a better fight.
I could not agree with this statement anymore but it should still be a solid fight ending in a Garbrandt ko hopefully haha.
 
It's not 200 Il tell you that. I expected much more to be honest. I figured we would have at least one title on the line. The loss of the Condit fight makes it less interesting too. Having said that I'm more excited for the main event than any fight on 200. Not so much the rest of the card.
This is the real 200 yeh
 
It´s a solid card you best believe that!

Damn @Toxxus, is that David Faustino in your Av or is that you? :)
 
Conor/Nate 2.

Rumble/Glover.

Cerrone/Story.

Means/Strickland.

Garbrandt/Mizugaki.

Larkin/Magny.

How could anybody possibly say that this card isn't very good?
The main card should be over the top exciting to the say the very least. Of course it is a bit of a bummer that Maia/Condit was moved to UFC on Fox 21 but saying that this card isn't very good on paper is just a little ridiculous IMO.

Thoughts on 202 as a whole?

Conor wins by decision or KO in round three/four.

Rumble wins by murder in round one.

Story wins by murder in round three.

Means wins by murder in round two.

Garbrandt wins by mauling in round one.

Magny wins by decision.
 
202 has a beastly main card and the prelims are stacked too. Bring on the 20th, our day of reckoning.
 
Conor wins by decision or KO in round three/four.

Rumble wins by murder in round one.

Story wins by murder in round three.

Means wins by murder in round two.

Garbrandt wins by mauling in round one.

Magny wins by decision.
Conor will win via decision with Nate in 5 round fight?
casual alert
 
It'll likely be a more entertaining card than ufc 200, which is kind of sad.
 
Back
Top