UFC 166 main card and prelims fighters

Discussion in 'UFC Discussion' started by LUDELOW, Oct 1, 2013.

  1. LUDELOW Brown Belt

    Joined:
    May 15, 2011
    Messages:
    4,884
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Fucktown
    John Dodson vs Darrell Montague on the main card??
    and
    Nate Marquardt vs. Hector Lombard on the prelims??

    somebody had a melt down putting this card together:mad:
     
  2. eatthisjerry Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    Messages:
    2,556
    Likes Received:
    0
    Prelims card always needs a boost fight.
     
  3. Skydome Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2012
    Messages:
    9,816
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dodson should be on the main card over a guy who's lost two in a row and one of the biggest dissapointments in recent UFC history
     
  4. ferrisjso Goat Lawyer

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,063
    Likes Received:
    247
    Location:
    Somewhere
    Dude Dodson v Montague is a much better fight than Marquardt v Lombard what are you talking about. If Dodson v Montague was on the prelims I would honestly have not bought the PPV.
     
  5. Arkridge Senior Moderator Senior Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2010
    Messages:
    21,901
    Likes Received:
    173
    Location:
    San Jose
    Both fights are PPV worthy. I don't see the complaints. It's not like you aren't going to get to see both fights. Lombard/Marquardt is a great way to end the prelims.
     
  6. CC27 Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2012
    Messages:
    19,154
    Likes Received:
    46
    Location:
    NJ
    Dodson/Montague is two top 10 fighters and could determine the next title shot.

    Nate/Lombard isnt nearly as important in their div.

    Fans cry that lower weight fights dont get main card spots and when they do what do mma fans do? they complain that they got a main card spot.
     
  7. Wayweary Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2012
    Messages:
    11,453
    Likes Received:
    0
    He didn't lose two in a row...
     
  8. Razuu Darth

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2010
    Messages:
    5,719
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Virginia
    May as well have. Still a big disappointment compared to the hype
     
  9. Skydome Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2012
    Messages:
    9,816
    Likes Received:
    0
    Huh? Yes he has...
     
  10. Mikedh Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    13,946
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Brooklyn
    Both are PPV worthy but Nate Marquardt dropped two in a row and Lombard has been pretty underwhelming in the UFC so far.

    I think Dodson-Montague is the better fight anyway.
     
  11. UL no more yellows Double Yellow Card

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    49,417
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nate Marquardt vs Hector Lombard sounds like an awesome fight but their jobs are on the line and I could see them both stalling and the fight being horrible to watch.
     
  12. Wayweary Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2012
    Messages:
    11,453
    Likes Received:
    0
    edit: Oh, you meant Nate. Thought you were saying that about Lombard.
     
  13. Arkridge Senior Moderator Senior Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2010
    Messages:
    21,901
    Likes Received:
    173
    Location:
    San Jose
    Assuming he's speaking of Hector Lombard, he had the Palhares win in between the Boetsch and Okami loses. Never two in a row.
     
  14. Zerwas1 White Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2013
    Messages:
    94
    Likes Received:
    0
    A top #3 Flyweight over a top #15 Welterweight, you got problems.
     
  15. Gigaton Punch Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2008
    Messages:
    17,247
    Likes Received:
    131
    Lombard really isn't all that entertaining to watch. He can KO guys but if he doesn't, his fights suck
     
  16. Skydome Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2012
    Messages:
    9,816
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm talking about Nate. Hence why I said a guy whos lost two in a row(Nate) and one of the biggest dissapointments in recent UFC history(Lombard)
     
  17. Mikedh Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    13,946
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Brooklyn
    He said one guy has dropped two (Nate) in a row and one is one of the biggest disappointments in the UFC (Lombard).
     
  18. ravifreitas Black Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2013
    Messages:
    5,226
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah, better watch two Top 20 WW than two Top 10 FLW, right?
     
  19. Wayweary Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2012
    Messages:
    11,453
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah, I just edited my last post to reflect that when I realized. Your phrasing makes it sound like you are talking about Dodson and one other dude who lost two in a row and is a big disappointment, which I took to be Lombard.
     
  20. EvoTheGamer Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,846
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    #BonesKnows
    He's only top 3 because that division is really weak.


    I agree TS. Nate vs Hector is worth my money where as Dodson vs whoever, isn't.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.