- Joined
- Oct 31, 2016
- Messages
- 10,553
- Reaction score
- 3,907
Two complete dog shit games in the span of weeks. Does anyone even buy Ubisoft garbage anymore?? If so how do u feel about paying for the same game over and over again??
What year is this?
Ubisoft has been releasing shit for a long time. They're basically neck and neck with EA.
Two complete dog shit games in the span of weeks. Does anyone even buy Ubisoft garbage anymore?? If so how do u feel about paying for the same game over and over again??
Legion and Valhalla and pretty much every other Ubisoft game cuz there all the same, not to mention the mechanics like shooting and fighting and driving are always inferior in Ubisoft games compared to other companies.What games are you talking about? Legion and Valhalla?
Coming to a head I think with the commercial and creative failure that was GR: Bp, I don't think anything is under the radar at Ubi's house anymore. They're being and have been called out for bad-faith practices ranging from reskins and MTX to preorder misrepresentation and passing off QA steps in development to paying players at launch. I remember reading they've an outdated corporate structure which had stymied the design process of otherwise talented studios. Some big internal changes were made or promised but I'm not sure we're seeing anything downstream come of that yet.Dunno how they’ve managed to fly under the radar for so long but fuck they make awful repetitive junk
Valhalla has above 80 on both meta and open critic.
Watch dogs is mid 70s low 80s by platform.
Movies are fine with those scores so should games. But the age of paid for high ratings makes people think it's a bad game when it is less than 9/10.
This is indicative of the industry. Review scores are over bloated. A ,7, is a bad game, and an 8, is a decent one. Reviewers dont want to anger the publishers so they dont lose future review copies, which makes them money. Reviews are dogshit, with only a few handful being decent.Valhalla has above 80 on both meta and open critic.
Watch dogs is mid 70s low 80s by platform.
Well it has come out Ubisoft was run through corporate executives. When shit hit the fan earlier this year with all the allegations of poor treatment including sexual advances. It was revealed basically one guy approved ubisoft games which was why they were cookie cutter. That is what he wanted.This is indicative of the industry. Review scores are over bloated. A ,7, is a bad game, and an 8, is a decent one. Reviewers dont want to anger the publishers so they dont lose future review copies, which make them money. Reviews are dogshit, with only a few handful being decent.
I whish they went back to really using the review scale properly. A ,7, should be a good game.
Ubisoft has been garbage for a long long time. They'll have the odd good game, here and there, but everything else feels like its been filtered through corporate executives, who dont play games and lack creativity, to sieve money from whales.
The thing is, that kind of way, never works in the long term. The same shit happened to TT [guys who made TWD, TFTB,TWAU], and that company is now done. I just recently watched a NoClip doc on it.Well it has come out Ubisoft was run through corporate executives. Then shit hit the fan earlier this year with all the allegations of poor treatment including sexual advances. It was revealed basically one guy approved ubisoft games which was why they were cookie cutter. That is what he wanted.
I never buy assassins creed games full price. I bought origins and odyssey for $20 each by just waiting a year. I got watch dogs legion for free when I bought the 3080. The moral of the story is don't spend $60 on a ubisoft game.