Economy U.S Rail Labor Kneecapped: Biden and Congress Illegalize Rail Union's Strike Against Unsafe Work Conditions

I was going by what a popular conservative AM talk-radio here in the upper Great Lakes region said.

And the thread that you're currently posting in already provided so much more in-depth information than what you're hearing on the radio. All you had to do is read to realize all the things your radio hosts (and the politicians on Capitol Hill) neglected to mention, or deliberately twisting the REAL reason for this contractual dispute.

This looming strike over Precision-Scheduled Railroading has been boiling for months now, and the ramifications are huge. Time to catch up on the REAL issue at hand that forced the 4 biggest rail workers unions (representing more workers than the smaller 8 combined), to the brinks of a general strike: the working conditions in the railroad industry under PSR.
---

The Trains Are Getting Longer and the Job Is Getting Worse
How railroad workers reached their breaking point.
By Henry Grabar | Dec 01, 2022

4f677f3b-6f85-4013-85e8-d2249708e8af.jpeg

What the average American knows about freight railroads is likely limited to what he sees through his windshield while waiting for a train to pass—and waiting, and waiting, and waiting. Grade crossings are a fixture of small towns (not for nothing do ruffians come from the wrong side of the tracks) and a routine headache in big cities like Chicago and Houston. The wait is getting longer because the trains are, too.

In fact, train crossings aren’t a bad vantage point to understand the crisis that has engulfed American railroads, where a looming strike could snarl the nation’s supply of grain, chemicals, and Christmas presents. The longer trains are part of the corporate strategy that has driven workers to the breaking point and diminished railroads’ role in American life, as Wall Street squeezes record profits from the country’s freight network but trucking continues to gain ground.

Conductors, engineers, train drivers, and other railroad employees, who have been working without a contract since 2019, want relief from what they say are grueling schedules with severe attendance policies and no paid sick leave. Four of the 12 major unions—representing a little more than half the country’s rail workers—have voted to reject a new contract brokered by President Joe Biden this fall. If they go on strike, the unions that have ratified contracts will walk out in solidarity, too.

Congress has the power to break the strike and impose the contract, and on Wednesday the House voted to force an end to the faceoff while setting paid sick leave for the workers at seven days. Democrats would like to avert a strike so as not to roil the economy and disrupt the holiday shopping season, but there may be pushback from progressives in the Senate, which is yet to vote on the measure. Republicans, meanwhile, can be counted on to vote for chaos on a Democrat’s watch. (Rail unions last went on strike in 1992, but only for 24 hours before Congress intervened.)

Over the past decade, North American railroads have been in the throes of an investor-driven reorganization designed to optimize “operating ratio,” or profits as a share of revenues. On this point they have performed with aplomb: Railroads have some of the highest net margins of any industry, in line with software and financial services. The big seven North American outfits have shelled out $30 billion more in dividends and stock buybacks than they’ve invested in their business over the past decade. And their income has nearly doubled. “We fundamentally changed the way we operate over the last 2½ years,” Bryan Tucker, vice president of communications at the freight railroad CSX, told the Washington Post in 2020. “It’s a different way of running a railroad.”

Most of this transformation is branded as “precision scheduled railroading,” or PSR, a scientific management approach that railroads say has made their business more reliable for customers and more predictable for workers. But you don’t need to be a student of railroads to understand what has sent companies’ stock prices sky-high. In the past decade, employment at the seven Class I railroads has fallen from 162,443 to 118,208. With that retrenchment has come sketchy maintenance practices, neglect, and accidents, according to an investigation by Motherboard.

Which brings us back to the signal bell that tells you to put it in park for a few minutes and count the train cars. Falling employee headcount has encouraged long trains, because it takes just two workers to run a train, whatever its length. Between 2008 and 2017, the average train length grew by 25 percent at two Class I railroads that submitted data for a Government Accountability Office study. Union Pacific has extended its trains by 30 percent since adopting PSR in 2018. Some trains are now as long as 3 miles from locomotive to caboose.

When something goes wrong, engineers need to walk for miles to inspect, and the more cars there are, the more likely it is that something will go wrong. “The rail bosses figured that they could just make the trains longer with their PSR scheme, mothball equipment and furlough workers—do more with less,” the SMART union, which voted to reject the contract, announced in a release last year.


Despite the name, there’s not much of a precision schedule for workers, who are guaranteed a rest after a shift but are otherwise always on call. While dangerous work all the live-long day was a hallmark of railroad life in the 19th century, many contemporary workers would like to be able, for example, to attend their kid’s birthday party or to keep their pay when they get sick.

Well, maybe that’s business. Railroads are making money like never before, and the workers make a six-figure salary, on average. But it’s not like the new American railroad has gotten better at moving freight. On the contrary, as the rail blogger Uday Schultz shows, rail carriers’ share of freight revenues hasn’t moved much since 2000. By weight, trains have lost ground to trucks in that time. And because railroads are a safer, cleaner, and cheaper way to move goods, their decision to trade investment and client acquisition for operating ratio and stock prices has costs. Martin Oberman, the chairman of the federal Surface Transportation Board, which oversees the railroads, has argued that more than 120 million tons of CO2 have been released into the atmosphere since 2002 “just because the [railroads] chose not to maintain their market share as compared to trucks.”

“They could go after that higher-value, more service-sensitive freight, but it would require a rethinking of the way they operate and an acceptance of a higher operating ratio because it would be more costly to produce this better service,” Trains magazine columnist Bill Stephens explained to me. “And that’s something that investors so far haven’t been terribly interested in.”

Nor has this obsession with efficiency translated into low prices for the goods that still do travel by rail—a mix of commodities like gas, coal, and grain, and intermodal containers full of consumer goods coming from overseas. By 2019, railroad rates were almost as high as they were in 1991, despite huge reductions in both track mileage and headcount. But there’s not much competition, and many big railroad customers have little choice but to pay what the railroads ask. Many supplier organizations have been vocal in criticizing the railroad companies for implementing PSR and have sided with their workers in the contract dispute.

If it all sounds a bit familiar—higher rates for hit-or-miss service, a captive customer base, reduced headcount, investment taking a back seat to investor profits—it’s because it’s much the same model that hedge funds have used to strip-mine local newspapers. Of course, no one thinks freight rail is being sold for parts and driven into obsolescence; some goods will always have to move by train. Still, how much have the railroads traded away, in foregone business, employee satisfaction, and investment in the future, in order to satisfy stockholders today?

The president can’t make freight companies do a better job competing with trucks. But by taking the companies’ side in the battle with the unions, he sends the railroads a sign that they’re doing a good job. The rest of us are stuck at the grade crossing, waiting for something to change.

https://slate.com/business/2022/12/freight-rail-strike-trains-csx-biden-congress.html
 
Last edited:
Only 3 House Republicans voted to give railworkers 7 days of paid sick leave


“I will proudly vote to lock in the tentative agreements and provide railroaders seven paid sick days,” DeFazio said in a statement. “The CEO’s can take a shift in the rail yard to cover them.”

It would be sacrilegious for a Republican to make such a statement

Sounds great until 25% of the workforce takes 3 sick days at the opening of deer season.
 
The us is all about socialism for the rich and corporations. Capitalism for everyone else.
Everyone I know is waking up to this fact. It's gone way too far.
 
Every Communist government throughout history used money.

I'm assuming you mean modern communist because most forms of human organization were primitive communist and did not have money, and often not even exchange.

Communism is literally defined by not having exchange or money at all, so what you are talking about is state socialism. And again, I don't care what a country calls itself. The Nazis called themselves socialists when they were fascists.
 
They asked for 15 days. They got 0.

Every democrat failed them including Bernie.

 
A substantial portion of resources and goods travel via railroad, so this isn't like autoworkers or silicon valley tech workers striking. Like utilities and ports this is a crucial industry; though obviously utlities are far more crucial. Railroads provide much of the coal to power generation stations. A strike would cause immense economic damage, possibly hasten a recession and make inflation worse.

naw, I understand what is at stake and what the trains and planes do and if they are that essential, have the Govt take them over and they can pay and treat the employees how they want.( and I don’t care if they do,try it, fuck it).


But coming in and controlling negotiations between a Union and its Employer is bullshit. This doesn’t just effect that 2 Billion Dollar a day disaster they keep talking about, this effect a every single union. Nurses are getting ready to strike and ask for better treatment and now they have less of a chance to win cause the Govt can just say fuck it, call them essential and force them to work in bad conditions and low pay. This effects every Union for here from on out and it did nothing but weaken them. Unions are the Working Man defense against unsafe working conditions and low wages. This will allow Amazon to bust up Union talk now and stop it before it can get started.

This hurts the Working Man. The Man that does what he is told to do. Gets up everyday, goes to work everyday, pay his bills everyday. So that he can afford his small piece of the American Dream. That is who this hurts, the little guy. The guy that doesn’t have a sit at the table, he waits on it. He is the cook, the waiter, the valet, his is the guy that the isn’t trying to Get Over on the system but is a part of the System and pays his taxes and this is that System poking him in the chest and saying Fuck You, You Don’t Matter.
 
Last edited:
naw, I understand what is at stake and what the trains and planes do and if they are that essential, have the Govt take them over and they can pay and treat the employees how they want.( and I don’t care if they do,try it, fuck it).


But coming in and controlling negotiations between a Union and its Employer is bullshit. This does just effect that 2 Billion Dollar a day disaster they keep talking about, this effect a every single union. Nurses are getting ready to strike and ask for better treatment and now they have less of a chance to win cause the Govt can just say fuck it and come in and force them to work in bad conditions and low pay. This effects every Union for here on out and it’s did nothing but weaken them. Unions are the Working Man defense against unsafe working conditions and low wages. This will allow Amazon to bust up Union talk now and stop it before it can get started.

This hurts the Working Man. The Man that does what he is told to do. Gets up everyday, goes to work everyday, pay his bills everyday. So that he can afford his small piece of the American Dream. That is who this hurts, the little guy. The guy that doesn’t have a sit at the table, he waits on it. He is the cook, the waiter, the valet, the guy that the isn’t trying to Get Over on the system but is a part of the System and pays his taxes and this that System poking him in the chest and saying Fuck You, You Don’t Matter.
<RomeroSalute>
 
As expected, not a single word about the horrible work condition under PSR was mentioned by the Representatives, Senators, and President forcing this contract down the workers' throats.

Only 15 Senators voted No: Bernie Sanders, John Hickenlooper, Kirsten Gillibrand, Elizabeth Warren, Ed Markey, Susan Collins, Tim Cotton, Ted Cruz, Bill Hagerty, Josh Hawley, Marco Rubio, Tim Scott, Rick Scott, Dan Sullivan, Pat Toomey.

The rail employees who wish that the rail barons would re-hire some of those 45,000 laid-off workers back to stabilize their gruesome work scheduling can finally put that dream to rest. It ain't gonna happen now that their only tool has been preemptively taken away by the politicians.



Senate voted 80-15 to avert national rail strike by forcing agreement between unions, employers

The White House had asked lawmakers to intervene in the labor dispute.
By Isabella Murray, Trish Turner, and Allison Pecorin | December 1, 2022



The Senate on Thursday voted to avert a looming strike of the nation's railway workers by forcing a labor agreement.

A bipartisan majority of senators approved a House bill that will codify a tentative agreement between the rail companies and rail unions, which was brokered in September and subsequently rejected by some of the workers.

The Senate separately voted down two additional provisions to address the labor dispute: whether to institute a 60-day extension of the so-called cooling off period between both sides and whether to grant workers seven days of paid sick leave.

The first vote, on the cooling off period, failed 69-26.

The second vote, to add seven paid sick days for workers, needed 60 votes to pass and fell short with a 52-43 total. Six Republicans -- Lindsey Graham, Josh Hawley, Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, Michael Braun and John Kennedy -- voted to add sick leave while one Democrat, Joe Manchin, voted no.

The third vote, to uphold the agreement negotiated by the White House between freight employees and their bosses in September, passed 80-15.

Some of the same Republicans who voted for the sick leave provision joined five members of the Democratic caucus -- Bernie Sanders, an independent, as well as John Hickenlooper, Kirsten Gillibrand, Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey -- in voting no. Those lawmakers were Sens. Susan Collins, Tim Cotton, Cruz, Bill Hagerty, Hawley, Rubio, Tim Scott, Rick Scott, Dan Sullivan and Pat Toomey.

President Joe Biden vowed in a statement on Thursday to sign the rail agreement bill "as soon as it comes to my desk,"

"I know that many in Congress shared my reluctance to override the union ratification procedures," he said. "But in this case, the consequences of a shutdown were just too great for working families all across the country. And, the agreement will raise workers’ wages by 24%, increase health care benefits, and preserve two person crews."

Biden said he'd work to further support paid sick leave.

"I have long been a supporter of paid sick leave for workers in all industries – not just the rail industry – and my fight for that critical benefit continues," he said.

Congress' move to end the labor fight came as the White House emphasized that they thought lawmakers must send legislation "by this weekend" to avert a work stoppage or the nation could see potentially “devastating effects," given how much of the economy relies on rail to move goods.

The workers' unions reacted with open dismay, they said, at the government's intervention and Biden has described himself as a "proud pro-labor" president who made a difficult decision for the good of the larger economy.

"This shouldn't be a Republican or Democratic issue, this should be an American issue," Peter Kennedy, director of strategic coordination and research at Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees, said in an interview with ABC News. "This should be about putting hardworking Americans first. This should be about putting our economy first. And you do that by fighting, by providing basic protections for workers."

At Biden's urging, the House on Wednesday passed a law enforcing the September tentative agreement plus separate legislation to add sick days for workers, which had become a major sticking point in the unsuccessful negotiations.

Kennedy said he "disagreed" with Biden's call on Congress to pass legislation to try and avert a strike, saying it takes away their ability to go on strike.

"I still believe that President Biden is the most pro-union president that there is, based on my experience in life. Now, with that being said, I disagree with his call on Congress. And because it takes away our ability to strike more or less, and we don't want to lose that ability because the only way we can get paid sick days and we believe is by withholding our labor," Kennedy said.

The House voted 290-137 to adopt the deal between the rail companies and employees that was negotiated by the White House and 221-207 for the sick leave -- a key provision in addressing progressive Democrats' concerns to further protect workers.

Sanders had been urging his colleagues to consider boosting paid leave provisions for the rail workers and spoke on the floor between votes on Thursday.

“Workers who do difficult and dangerous work have zero paid sick days. Zero. You get sick, you’ve got a mark against you. Couple of marks, you get fired. This cannot and must not happen in America in 2022,” he said.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer announced the commencement of votes after a luncheon meeting with Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and Labor Secretary Marty Walsh concluded.

“I’m very glad that the two sides got together to avoid a shutdown which would be devastating for the American people, the American economy and so many workers across the country,” Schumer said on the Senate floor.

Biden said on Thursday that Congress would get a deal done to avert a railroad shutdown and that paid sick leave for those union workers would not be “within this agreement.”

An ABC analysis of the report of what had been negotiated between the Presidential Emergency Board (PEB) and the unions and freight railroad carriers found that the railroad workers essentially didn't have sick days under their current contracts. They have "personal leave days" that they can schedule, which is what prompted their ask for guaranteed sick days --15 of them-- that they could use at any point.

Their bosses and the president’s board both rejected that push, fearing what they called serious operational problems. The PEB decided to give workers "one additional day of personal leave time."

The House-passed but Senate-failed bill would have given workers "7 days of paid sick leave annually."

Biden warned on Thursday that if the nation’s rails were to close over the labor dispute, “It’s going to immediately cost 750,000 jobs and cause a recession.”

“We're going to avoid the rail strike, keep the rails running, keep things moving, and I'm going to go back and we're going to get paid leave, not just for rail workers but for all workers," he insisted.

The Transportation Trades Department, a department of the AFL-CIO union, on Thursday said they "unequivocally and wholeheartedly" did not support a cooling off period extension past the current deadline of Dec. 9.

"Freight railroads have made it clear that they are not interested in further negotiations with rail unions. Thus, any proposal to further extend the cooling off period would yield zero progress. Rather, an extension would simply allow the railroads to maintain their status quo operations while prolonging the workforce’s suffering," Greg Regan and Shari Semelsberger, president and secretary-treasurer of TTD, said in a joint statement.

The legislative votes on the labor dispute drew a number of unusual dividing lines between Republicans and Democrats: For example, Hawley, R-Mo., joined Sanders as an early proponent of the sick leave provision.

Rubio, R-Fla., publicly tweeted his support against union leaders.

“The railways & workers should go back & negotiate a deal that the workers, not just the union bosses, will accept,” he wrote in a tweet on Monday. “But if Congress is forced to do it, I will not vote to impose a deal that doesn’t have the support of the rail workers.”

“Union bosses & Biden sold out the workers to make a deal,” Rubio then wrote in a Wednesday tweet.

Cruz, R-Texas,, said earlier on Thursday that Republicans were “the party of railroad union workers.”

After he voted yes on the amendment for paid sick leave, he walked over to Sanders on the floor and gave him a fist bump.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/sen...ce-labor-agreement-increase/story?id=94294331
 
Last edited:
The real question of course is how inclusive are the strike buster teams going to be?
 
That's kind of the point of a strike, to inflict as high as a cost as possible. Past that you seem very anti labor so not much to say
He also believes the earth is flat. Explains a lot of his ridiculous takes on issues.


Also remember these guys

Only 15 Senators voted No: Bernie Sanders, John Hickenlooper, Kirsten Gillibrand, Elizabeth Warren, Ed Markey, Susan Collins, Tim Cotton, Ted Cruz, Bill Hagerty, Hawley, Marco Rubio, Tim Scott, Rick Scott, Dan Sullivan, Pat Toomey.

Say what you will be they all at least took a stand and voted for labor.

I definitely am not a fan of a lot of them but must give credit when it's due
 
Only 15 Senators voted No: Bernie Sanders, John Hickenlooper, Kirsten Gillibrand, Elizabeth Warren, Ed Markey, Susan Collins, Tim Cotton, Ted Cruz, Bill Hagerty, Hawley, Marco Rubio, Tim Scott, Rick Scott, Dan Sullivan, Pat Toomey.

Say what you will be they all at least took a stand and voted for labor.

I definitely am not a fan of a lot of them but must give credit when it's due

You could argue I spose many of them did so cynically in a vote they knew they were going to lose, I'm guessing none of the Republicans have stood up much for labour besides this and we saw how Warrens bread was buttered in the primaries last time, fake trojan horse socialist who backed Biden.
 
Last edited:
Maybe I am just really out of my realm here but how does this even work, how can they prevent them from going on strike?

Isn't that the point of a strike, you walkout and put pressure to meet the demands. It sounds like they have a ton of leverage.
 
Amtrak Joe was supposed to be great for the railroad. Guess not. Not only do they only get 1 paid sick day, they also don't get state specific benefits.
For example ny state has paid family leave for fathers after birth of a child. Railroaders are exempt.
Ny also mandates health insurance companies cover ivf and fertility issues. Railroaders are also exempt.

They are only ever entitled to what they are able to negotiate and now their legs get cut out when they actually have leverage. Total betrayal.

I suppose they could still strike or quit but that's easy to say, harder to do.
 
Maybe I am just really out of my realm here but how does this even work, how can they prevent them from going on strike?

Isn't that the point of a strike, you walkout and put pressure to meet the demands. It sounds like they have a ton of leverage.

The difference is that under a LEGAL strike by unionized workers (it's considered to be legal after all avenues of negotiation has been exhausted), the employers CANNOT discipline or retaliate against the strikers or risk extremely heavy penalty by the state's labor board. They may hire scabs to cross the picket line to keep the crippled business limping for a while, but that replacement can only be temporary by law, and those jobs must be returned to the strikers once the disputed has ended.

Striking is an enormously powerful tool, since there is no way any employers today can find over 115,000 highly-skilled scabs to fill in these highly-specialized jobs (the other 8 smaller unions also pledged to go on strike as well in solidarity). This is why the rail barons pushed the politicians so hard to intervene on their behalf before the Dec 9th deadline, while the rail workers desperately wants the politicians to stay the hell out of their collective bargaining process.

Once Congress passed a case-specific legislation to prohibits the unions involved from striking and force them to accept the contract their employer is offering (which both the House and the Senate just did overwhelmingly, and will most certainly be signed into law ASAP by the President who asked Congress to hold that vote), any subsequent strike over that contract would be deemed ILLEGAL, and any employees walking off the job now would have none of that labor protection under the law.

That means the rail barons can do whatever the fuck they want to discipline (or simply firing) the rail workers who still wanna go on an illegal "wildcat" strike after that legislation is signed, because by law you're no longer a legitimate striker, just a lazy employee not showing up to work, and there's nothing your union can do to help you.

Long story short: there will be no striking now. The exhausted rail workers will just have to endure the bloody knife stabbed in their already-broken backs by their supposed political allies, all the way until this force-fed contract expires years from now. Or they'll just quit en masse as soon as they find a similar job in other industries.

PS: Since this labor dispute is about the railroad, you can read up more about it on the Railroad Labor Act pertaining to the subject matter.
 
Last edited:
The only way the rail workers could win now is if there was a great general strike with workers all across the country showing solidarity. Which of course isn't gonna happen. This is such a terrible state of affairs for American workers. Of course the Republicans will never have the workers' backs, and now there can be no ambiguity (if indeed there was any) that Democrats will always side with the robber barons as well. Will this lead to a mass awakening among the people? Nah, there is so much media to distract and divide the people that this will be forgotten as the news cycle moves on to some bullshit. And the downward spiral will continue.
 
Back
Top