1. Where did your likes go? Please Read This Thread »

Two questions for those who are anti-MMA Union

Discussion in 'UFC Discussion' started by Not A Real Fan, Aug 11, 2016.

  1. Not A Real Fan The Lucifer Alpha Slayer Yellow Card

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2015
    Messages:
    2,616
    Likes Received:
    125
    Please list the number of sports that were destroyed when players got unionized ("destroyed" being the proper standard since this is what the Chicken Little anti-Union folks insist will happen).

    1.
    2.
    3.
    4.
    5.

    Please list the number of sports that were more popular, more profitable, and more visible before their players got unionized.

    1.
    2.
    3.
    4.
    5.


    SPOILER ALERT
























    You can't name one.

    Yet you will insist that a Union is a existential threat to the entire sport. You'll repeat conservative bullshit that you uncritically accept in the face of real world examples to the contrary.

    I don't know the new owners. But they claim to want to take the UFC to new heights. You know they had to know about the lawsuit, the Ali Act, and of rumblings about a fighter's Union yet they ponied up 4 billion dollars anyway.

    My guess/hope is that the "new heights" they speak of means taking the UFC from its current redneck trash niche to real sport status. A real sport has a Union. Baseball, football, soccer, basketball, and hockey. All unionized. Imagine if any of these sports were not unionized and players only got 10/10?

    Unionization will lead to the sport getting bigger, much more profitable, and much more visible. In others, new heights.

    The status quo will keep the sport dependent on the archaic PPV model and pin their hopes on a few fighters breaking into the mainstream every couple of years.
     
  2. xterm11 Sonofabitch I'm sick of these dolphins

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2009
    Messages:
    1,371
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Boston
    I don't care either way. That is the fighters prerogative not mine. A fighters Union does not affect my life in any way shape or form because I do not fight for a living.

    Short story short, why do people care some much about the financials of other people when you (the person) cannot effect it at all? It is up to them to know their worth and get paid for it.
     
  3. Rovert Yellow Card Yellow Card

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2009
    Messages:
    2,157
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    (905) Aurora Motherfucker
    Its a weird 1 , its more like Boxing but at the same time set up WWE style on the UFC's end .
     
  4. GilErick Blue Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2014
    Messages:
    739
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Lyon, France
    They want a baseball player to represent the fighters ?
    WTF ?!
     
  5. Xaero Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    Messages:
    4,552
    Likes Received:
    0
    UFC is not a sport though... i think..
     
  6. MMAViewer Black Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Messages:
    5,652
    Likes Received:
    0
    I can simplify this.

    Republicans don't want unions and will bad mouth them.
    Democrats want them and will bad mouth their opposition.

    We have politicized unions and our political stance has become to decisive to even have a discussion or ever compromise.
     
  7. Bartinho Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Messages:
    2,919
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Rowlett, TX
    Destroyed? Well that's not really what's at stake, the real question is, do you want to pay the same ticket and merchandise prices for UFC as you do for NFL and NBA?
     
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2016
  8. deviake Literally, figuratively, & ironically

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2015
    Messages:
    9,436
    Likes Received:
    170
    Location:
    Completely lost due to incompetence
    Still waiting for a counter argument. I'm curious as well.
     
  9. chitoortiz Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2010
    Messages:
    15,010
    Likes Received:
    793
    No.

    I wouldn't.
     
  10. johncola Red Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2011
    Messages:
    8,442
    Likes Received:
    78
    I don't know shit about unions. But why do you support it? What would be the benefit to the sport, and more specifically to us, the fans?

    Generally, fans should side with promoters, since we generally want the same things. We want good MMA. UFC wants to make MMA good to get our money. But fighters' interests seem to be against our own. MMA isn't like other sports where it's just a game, as there's health risks, and thus fighters can't fight regularly or on a schedule. To go with that, fighters generally don't want to fight. They're doing it for the money and would prefer to not "play MMA", and thus avoid risking getting beat up if they can. The more money they have, the less they're gonna wanna fight. More importantly, would unions affect matchmaking too, or just fighter pay? If it's the former, that could obviously be a bad thing, as the recent Woodley debacle shows that fighters aren't gonna put the sport above their own interest to get paid and take easy fights.

    Like I said, I don't know shit about unions, but on the surface it seems bad for fans and promoters and good for fighters. I obviously want good things for the fighters, but only to the extent where it won't create a much greater negative impact (from my perspective) on the fans.
     
  11. TMAN29 Green Belt

    Joined:
    May 20, 2015
    Messages:
    1,114
    Likes Received:
    0
    So let them fight through the health risks and not get compensated properly for that flr the fans viewership. Fuck u dude lol. What a joke of an argument!
     
  12. Despotic Double Yellow Card Double Yellow Card

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2009
    Messages:
    604
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    TN
    I think the people who oppose it without explaining why dont appreciate the full scope of the issue and frankly I dont think you do either judging by your attitude.

    It's a high economic quandry that hasnt been solved. Labor unions monotize labor. They narrow it down to dollars and cents instead of letting the market dictate the price of labor. Many times with labor unions it is short term benefits cause long term issues. It protects low level security in exchange for limiting high level success. Keep in mind the latter doesnt necessarily apply to sports. Real world labor unions have destroyed real world industries in the past. Ask Pittsburgh how the steel industry is or how Detroit's anything industry is.

    What Im saying is it is an over simplified argument on both sides.
     
  13. F0od Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    3,735
    Likes Received:
    0
    Daddy Dana will never let this happen.


    Ya goofs
     
  14. johncola Red Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2011
    Messages:
    8,442
    Likes Received:
    78
    What's "properly"? Everyone wants as much money as possible. Nobody's slaves here.

    You don't like that I'm putting my own interests ahead of the fighters, but that's different to my argument being a joke. I'm "arguing" for what I prefer. Unless you disagree about my preferences, then my argument isn't a joke. I never made an argument about what the law should be or anything like that.

    One thing I would like to see is some sort of fighter pension system. That wouldn't remove incentive for fighters to take fights. Meanwhile, it'd give them peace of mind to know they're taken care of when their career is over.
     
  15. TMAN29 Green Belt

    Joined:
    May 20, 2015
    Messages:
    1,114
    Likes Received:
    0
    Like you said, this doesnt apply to sports. People need to stop comparing ufc fighters situations to their own. Need ti start comparing them to other 4 billion dollor or more sports lol
     
  16. straight6 Black Belt

    Joined:
    May 9, 2011
    Messages:
    6,792
    Likes Received:
    0
    anti union sherdoggers were mostly zuffa shills...but now no longer zuffa..
     
  17. GordaoPreguico Red Belt

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2011
    Messages:
    8,084
    Likes Received:
    26
    none of the other sports are in anyway similar to mma. So your challenge is nonsensical.
     
  18. milliniar Who needs a belt?

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    24,657
    Likes Received:
    352
    Location:
    Wade Wilson's Hometown
    The PFA should apply to all mma orgs.
     
  19. Sir Matticus Orange Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2016
    Messages:
    269
    Likes Received:
    0
    Here is a counter argument, albeit a small one.

    Fighter X decides the day before the fight that he doesn't like what he is going to get paid. He decides to not fight on the main event the next night, knowing that since he will claim it's a dispute over pay, then he will suffer no consequences.

    Much anticipated main event is cancelled, Fighter X still gets some cash, and will soon sign to fight again...........without any insurance he will actually fight when the time comes.
     
  20. pbateman Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2015
    Messages:
    1,839
    Likes Received:
    65
    Location:
    foaming at the mouth and running at pigeons

    keyboard warrior at it's finest,
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.