Probably because Bloomberg has the scratch to buy his way onto the stage.And yet, the DNC changed its rules to Allow Bloomberg on the debate stage.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/20...-open-door-mike-bloomberg-make-stage-n1127676
the DNC is so fucking corrupt is unreal. The media won’t say anything as they are just an arm of the DNC itself.
the changed the rules to get tulsi off the stage before. They don’t want her saying that forbidden anti war stuff.
I can't wait for the Democratic establishment to die off.
Is this CNNs doing or is it the DNC? Why do they dislike Tulsi?
And yet, the DNC changed its rules to Allow Bloomberg on the debate stage.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/20...-open-door-mike-bloomberg-make-stage-n1127676
the DNC is so fucking corrupt is unreal. The media won’t say anything as they are just an arm of the DNC itself.
the changed the rules to get tulsi off the stage before. They don’t want her saying that forbidden anti war stuff.
Kamala Harris was a good candidate?Oh for fuck sakes man. She’s not invited because she’s super unpopular with the left. Actual good candidates like Booker, Castro and Harris had to drop out and so does she.
But don’t worry, her gig on fox will be really lucrative.
I don’t do quizzes but she surprised me as an advocate for m4a (I’m uncertain that’s the way to go though). Now if you want to be an adult and have a conversation let’s do it.Kamala Harris was a good candidate?
Name one thing she stood for that you actually believe without looking it up.
Instead of giving one example you say you don't answer "quizzes" and give a generic non-answer.I don’t do quizzes but she surprised me as an advocate for m4a. Now if you want to be an adult and have a conversation let’s do it.
And for others, Harris is smart as hell and well qualified. She ran a crappy campaign but I’d take her over Gabbard without a second thought.
She is an advocate for m4a but differentiated by stating she didn’t want to kill private insurance. Looks like you’re not paying attention.Instead of giving one example you say you don't answer "quizzes" and give a generic non-answer.
And she is not for medicare for all.
But she is a good candidate even though you can't say why.
Be an adult? I asked you one question and you can't answer it. So you be an adult.
She isn't for medicare for all. She is for some hybrid plan that still leaves people uncovered. This is a generic non-answer cause it's obvious you have zero knowledge of her policies.She is an advocate for m4a but differentiated by stating she didn’t want to kill private insurance. Looks like you’re not paying attention.
Stating that she has good experience and is very intelligent isn’t an answer? Idk why you think policy positions are all that’s required for qualifying as president but that’s wrong.
Oh fuck off man. It’s not m4a because she has a variation and that’s not good enough for you? For the record you’re wrong and she wanted everyone covered. You’re bombing here. If you want to criticize me get your shit right.She isn't for medicare for all. She is for some hybrid plan that still leaves people uncovered. This is a generic non-answer cause it's obvious you have zero knowledge of her policies.
Thinking she is has experience and is intelligent makes her a good candidate? Rand Paul is no dummy and had experience, is he a good candidate too?
Seriously, name one policy.
Medicare for all means exactly that. She doesn't want everyone to have medicare. It's not the smae.Oh fuck off man. It’s not m4a because she has a variation and that’s not good enough for you?
You believe in progressive policies, does that make you qualified? Why not?
What would you say? The typical bullshit that she’s against war? Or would you bring up the fact that she illegally conducted foreign policy? Or that she’s not very intelligent by presidential standards and her education isn’t solid? Or that she was raised by a cult?Medicare for all means exactly that. She doesn't want everyone to have medicare. It's not the smae.
You said she is a good candidate and you can't even say why. If I said I think Gabbard is a good candidate, I would be able to give you an example of why I think so. I wouldn't says something generic like she is smart and a veteran.
I like Tulsi but agree with you on this an even blocking whole states from allowing other to register to run against Trump.Funny to see conservatives all up in arms about the DNC not paying lip service to one of 12 fringe candidates while the GOP literally declined to even hold primaries.