Social Tucker Carlson Starstruck By Historian Who Calls Churchill, Not Hitler, the ‘Chief Villain’ of WW2 and Casts Holocaust as Accident

Again, Commie sympathizers have no room to talk
You can't stop ducking questions can you. I asked you directly, where is this evidence that I'm a commie sympathizer? Otherwise shut the fuck up and perhaps read a history book instead of carrying waters for Nazis.
 
You can't stop ducking questions can you. I asked you directly, where is this evidence that I'm a commie sympathizer? Otherwise shut the fuck up and perhaps read a history book instead of carrying waters for Nazis.

You support the West allying with the Communists and giving Eastern Europe to them. You downplay the Soviet concentration camps. By your own standard that makes you a Commie sympathizer.
 
You support the West allying with the Communists and giving Eastern Europe to them. You downplay the Soviet concentration camps. By your own standard that makes you a Commie sympathizer.
I think defeating Nazi Germany was the right decision from US interests, as well as those of Western Europe and overall human life. That's not even mentioning that Germany declared war on the US and made allying with the USSR fait accompli. Endorsing an alliance of convenience doesn't mean I endorse communism or think Eastern Europe belonged to the Soviets, anymore so than endorsing a UK-US alliance means I think tea is amazing.

You're still spouting bullshit. Quote me where I downplayed Soviet concentration camps.
 
I think defeating Nazi Germany was the right decision from US interests, as well as those of Western Europe and overall human life. That's not even mentioning that Germany declared war on the US and made allying with the USSR fait accompli. Endorsing an alliance of convenience doesn't mean I endorse communism or think Eastern Europe belonged to the Soviets, anymore so than endorsing a UK-US alliance means I think tea is amazing.

You're still spouting bullshit. Quote me where I downplayed Soviet concentration camps.

So what you're saying is your view is nuanced and not an endorsement or statement of affection for the Soviet Union? Interesting. So when are you going to afford that same understanding to others? If I were to say defeating the Communists rather than the Nazis was in our best interests as well as those of Western Europe and overall human life you'd call me a Nazi sympathizer. So by your own standard you're a Commie sympathizer.
 
If I were to say defeating the Communists rather than the Nazis was in our best interests as well as those of Western Europe and overall human life you'd call me a Nazi sympathizer.
I call you a Nazi sympathizer because of this.
I have no idea what Hitler was trying to do. I only know whats has been written by the victors.
You claim ignorance of what Hitler was going to do despite ample evidence from Mein Kampf, his many speeches calling for the annihilation of Jews, or notes from the Wansee Conference. No one is this dumb.
Well they can also be used to round up people who are allied with or sympathetic to those who have declared war on you.
Here you are endorsing Jews and homosexuals being sent to concentration camps, and ultimately extermination camps as the war progressed. There is no defending concentration camps in any country during World War II.
 
I felt like Hitler made his intentions pretty clear.
I think he told them to get rid of olive juice and they simply misunderstood and he was too embarrassed to correct them after seeing all the hard work they put into it. Like when your kid does a shittyspiderman drawing that you call a sheep before they correct you and you have to go oh wow it’s a really good Spider-Man too!
 
I felt like Hitler made his intentions pretty clear.

He even wrote a book about it. I've never bought the idea that Germans didn't know what they were getting with Hitler. Sure, they probably didn't think he'd follow through on all of his insane ideas, but he also wasn't hiding his true nature like some evil mastermind. What you saw was what you got for the most part.
 
He even wrote a book about it. I've never bought the idea that Germans didn't know what they were getting with Hitler. Sure, they probably didn't think he'd follow through on all of his insane ideas, but he also wasn't hiding his true nature like some evil mastermind. What you saw was what you got for the most part.
Most of the Germany population knew what was happening to the Jews. You can't remove millions of people without others noticing, that's just not how countries work.
 
Um Hamburg for starters???
Dresden was only the city which was devastated the most severely. As I mentioned this happened constantly during ww2 and it happened everywhere. Add up all the needless civilian bombing casualties on the Western front and it will be millions.

If its hard for you to believe Hitler didn't want to have a civilian bombing contest which he stood nothing to gain from you must think he is some super villain or something. Remember that Britain and France declared war on him, not vice versa. All his plans were in the east.
 
This is the Guy Mark Cuban was pissed about with Musk on Twitter.

It's ok.

He's just some guy that takes a really long time to talk about shit he's read. He's not a great historian, but he does look into history and discuss it. You can agree or disagree with his line of thinking. His podcast on Jeffery Epstein was pretty good. (very long)

Other people make their case much more succinctly, EX:
Sachs is arguably much smarter than a Cooper, but it doesn't mean he's completely right on everything he talks about either.
He's likely right about the following.



Other goons are out there too.
"Memes destroying the sacred"



Its great there are long form discussions on History, Social, Financial, etc. from more less intelligent people, and sometimes very intelligent people. Better to have more of it rather than less.
 
I call you a Nazi sympathizer because of this.

Nice try but you called me a Nazi sympathizer long before that. You called me a Nazi simply because I said Churchill was responsible for the war. You called another poster a Nazi sympathizer simply for sharing the experiences of his German relatives.

You claim ignorance of what Hitler was going to do despite ample evidence from Mein Kampf, his many speeches calling for the annihilation of Jews, or notes from the Wansee Conference. No one is this dumb.

Call me skeptical. Is that such a crime? Actually it is some parts of the world which makes me even more skeptical.

Here you are endorsing Jews and homosexuals being sent to concentration camps, and ultimately extermination camps as the war progressed. There is no defending concentration camps in any country during World War II.

I didn't defend anything. You just made that up. But going by this standard you defended and endorsed Soviet camps you Stalinist.
 
I know it's nuts. The country declaring war and refusing countless peace proposals are the ones to blame for the war. Cra
We already had a peace signed in 1938 in Munich , he then took a massive shit on it when he went beyond the Sudetenland and took lands that were not and never had been German along with the arms and armaments factories therein .
You don't get to throw your best punches and then just call it quits thats not how fights or wars work , given that and his disregard for treaties (promised to respect Belgian neutrality when they left the Entente then invades France via Belgium) maybe we just didn't trust the cunt .
 
Back
Top