- Joined
- Feb 27, 2019
- Messages
- 6,580
- Reaction score
- 1,261
What the fuck is happening right now?
What the fuck is happening right now?
Blah, blah, Pelosi and Nadler were 100% behind Obama's obstruction of congress during fast and furious, blah, blah..
Hypocrisy in Washington? The hell you say!
Click on the photo of Bolton if you're a leftist and now a big fan, want to hear from him as a witness and would like him to appear larger.
TRUMP BLASTS BOLTON 'LIES'...
BOOK BLOWS TRIAL OPEN...
GLIMPSE OF NIGHTMARE SCENARIO...
FIGHT FOR WITNESSES INTENSIFIES...
Romney, Collins signal support...
Toomey proposes 'one-for-one' deal...
MAG: All the president's turncoats...
Obama refused to turn over documents the admin deemed non pertinent, were sued, and are still in court. These are not equivalent situations, homie. Obama was asked by Holder to assert privilege, he didn't assert privilege in blanket fashion for all admin officials and all documents pertinent to legal requests by a co-equal branch of government.
Since you keep avoiding, like a bitch: Since this is all a hoax, why doesn't Trump instruct his people to go under oath and blow apart the democrat narrative that originated with his own appointees? If the facts are on their side, despite countless testimonies from those directly involved and audio evidence, it'd take a moment to release relevant documents, no?
No better way to dissolve a hoax than to bring facts to light. Yet, Trump insists on hiding as much as he possibly can.
Care to propose an asinine reason as to why they are obstructing in complete?
Trump = Public."Trumps thinks his self serving actions, are for the public good"
After it is decided to not have witnesses...THEN let the public decide."Let the public decide"
The public wants documents and witnesses.....
Oh' please. You will never be satisfied, no matter what. You're one of the same idiots who were complaining that a 30 year old sexual assault allegation wasn't properly investigated...despite having all pertinent witnesses interviewed, multiple vetting processes, FBI investigations, etc, etc.
The jig is up. All you and the Dems want is to drag this out as long as possible. You don't care about "facts". You care about the narrative.
The Reps should 100% tell the Dems and their lazy ass impeachment scheme to fuck right off. If and when Bolton can't give you any smoking gun, it will be another thing that needs to be looked at, and then another, and another...
I look forward to the Reps telling you and your ilk to kick rocks.
Oh
WASHINGTON — John R. Bolton, the former national security adviser, privately told Attorney General William P. Barr last year that he had concerns that President Trump was effectively granting personal favors to the autocratic leaders of Turkey and China, according to an unpublished manuscript by Mr. Bolton.
Mr. Barr responded by pointing to a pair of Justice Department investigations of companies in those countries and said he was worried that Mr. Trump had created the appearance that he had undue influence over what would typically be independent inquiries, according to the manuscript. Backing up his point, Mr. Barr mentioned conversations Mr. Trump had with the leaders, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey and President Xi Jinping of China.
Mr. Bolton’s account underscores the fact that the unease about Mr. Trump’s seeming embrace of authoritarian leaders, long expressed by experts and his opponents, also existed among some of the senior cabinet officers entrusted by the president to carry out his foreign policy and national security agendas.
Mr. Bolton recounted his discussion with Mr. Barr in a draft of an unpublished book manuscript that he submitted nearly a month ago to the White House for review. People familiar with the manuscript described its contents on the condition of anonymity.
The book also contains an account of Mr. Trump telling Mr. Bolton in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations of political rivals, The New York Times reported on Sunday. The matter is at the heart of the articles of impeachment against the president.
A Justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment on Mr. Barr’s conversations with Mr. Bolton, as did a spokesman for the National Security Council. In a statement on Monday, Mr. Bolton, his publisher and his literary agency said they had not shared the manuscript with The Times.
“There was absolutely no coordination with The New York Times or anyone else regarding the appearance of information about his book, ‘The Room Where It Happened,’ at online booksellers,” Mr. Bolton, Simon & Schuster and Javelin said in a joint statement. “Any assertion to the contrary is unfounded speculation.”
Dean Baquet, the executive editor of The Times, responded that “The Times does not discuss its sources, but I should point out that no one has questioned the accuracy of our report.”