Trump/Ukraine V25 Trump Impeachment Trial---Bolton Becomes 100% Truthful Leftist Hero Overnight

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bu bu but Biden is the new bu bu but Obama
 
They are really trying to argue that you cant be impeached without charges of a crime? What a waste of time. Trump always did surround himself with the best people.

<{outtahere}>
 
Click on the photo of Bolton if you're a leftist and now a big fan, want to hear from him as a witness and would like him to appear larger.
1000.jpeg

TRUMP BLASTS BOLTON 'LIES'...
BOOK BLOWS TRIAL OPEN...
GLIMPSE OF NIGHTMARE SCENARIO...
FIGHT FOR WITNESSES INTENSIFIES...
Romney, Collins signal support...
Toomey proposes 'one-for-one' deal...
MAG: All the president's turncoats...
 
BarryDillon said:


It's almost like these people have no principles at all.

No wonder @HereticBD loves them so much.
Click to expand...


Blah, blah, Pelosi and Nadler were 100% behind Obama's obstruction of congress during fast and furious, blah, blah..

Hypocrisy in Washington? The hell you say!
 
Alan Dershowitz "I used to believe this was impeachable, but Trump gave me a job."
 
BarryDillon said:
3mpm5q.jpg
Click to expand...

How old a- ah, who cares?! - Trump lawyer Alan Dershowitz

HereticBD said:
Blah, blah, Pelosi and Nadler were 100% behind Obama's obstruction of congress during fast and furious, blah, blah..

Hypocrisy in Washington? The hell you say!
Click to expand...

Obama refused to turn over documents the admin deemed non pertinent, were sued, and are still in court. These are not equivalent situations, homie. Obama was asked by Holder to assert privilege, he didn't assert privilege in blanket fashion for all admin officials and all documents pertinent to legal requests by a co-equal branch of government.

Since you keep avoiding, like a bitch: Since this is all a hoax, why doesn't Trump instruct his people to go under oath and blow apart the democrat narrative that originated with his own appointees? If the facts are on their side, despite countless testimonies from those directly involved and audio evidence, it'd take a moment to release relevant documents, no?

No better way to dissolve a hoax than to bring facts to light. Yet, Trump insists on hiding as much as he possibly can.

Care to propose an asinine reason as to why they are obstructing in complete?
 
"Let the public decide"

The public wants documents and witnesses.....
 
PHATV said:
Click on the photo of Bolton if you're a leftist and now a big fan, want to hear from him as a witness and would like him to appear larger.
1000.jpeg

TRUMP BLASTS BOLTON 'LIES'...
BOOK BLOWS TRIAL OPEN...
GLIMPSE OF NIGHTMARE SCENARIO...
FIGHT FOR WITNESSES INTENSIFIES...
Romney, Collins signal support...
Toomey proposes 'one-for-one' deal...
MAG: All the president's turncoats...
Click to expand...

It's odd how you guys are adopting literally the same exact argument that Bruce Cutler employed in his defense of John Gotti. Pretend the recordings, transcripts and testimonies are all illusory.

You're gonna trust Sammy the Bull now?!? Forget those tapes, he's clearly a liar!!!!

Nobody is a fan of Bolton, but since he was directly involved, he needs to testify, period.
 
"Trumps thinks his self serving actions, are for the public good"
 
hillelslovak87 said:
Obama refused to turn over documents the admin deemed non pertinent, were sued, and are still in court. These are not equivalent situations, homie. Obama was asked by Holder to assert privilege, he didn't assert privilege in blanket fashion for all admin officials and all documents pertinent to legal requests by a co-equal branch of government.

Since you keep avoiding, like a bitch: Since this is all a hoax, why doesn't Trump instruct his people to go under oath and blow apart the democrat narrative that originated with his own appointees? If the facts are on their side, despite countless testimonies from those directly involved and audio evidence, it'd take a moment to release relevant documents, no?

No better way to dissolve a hoax than to bring facts to light. Yet, Trump insists on hiding as much as he possibly can.

Care to propose an asinine reason as to why they are obstructing in complete?
Click to expand...

Oh' please. You will never be satisfied, no matter what. You're one of the same idiots who were complaining that a 30 year old sexual assault allegation wasn't properly investigated...despite having all pertinent witnesses interviewed, multiple vetting processes, FBI investigations, etc, etc.

The jig is up. All you and the Dems want is to drag this out as long as possible. You don't care about "facts". You care about the narrative.

The Reps should 100% tell the Dems and their lazy ass impeachment scheme to fuck right off. If and when Bolton can't give you any smoking gun, it will be another thing that needs to be looked at, and then another, and another...

I look forward to the Reps telling you and your ilk to kick rocks.
 
Oh



WASHINGTON — John R. Bolton, the former national security adviser, privately told Attorney General William P. Barr last year that he had concerns that President Trump was effectively granting personal favors to the autocratic leaders of Turkey and China, according to an unpublished manuscript by Mr. Bolton.

Mr. Barr responded by pointing to a pair of Justice Department investigations of companies in those countries and said he was worried that Mr. Trump had created the appearance that he had undue influence over what would typically be independent inquiries, according to the manuscript. Backing up his point, Mr. Barr mentioned conversations Mr. Trump had with the leaders, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey and President Xi Jinping of China.

Mr. Bolton’s account underscores the fact that the unease about Mr. Trump’s seeming embrace of authoritarian leaders, long expressed by experts and his opponents, also existed among some of the senior cabinet officers entrusted by the president to carry out his foreign policy and national security agendas.

Mr. Bolton recounted his discussion with Mr. Barr in a draft of an unpublished book manuscript that he submitted nearly a month ago to the White House for review. People familiar with the manuscript described its contents on the condition of anonymity.

The book also contains an account of Mr. Trump telling Mr. Bolton in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations of political rivals, The New York Times reported on Sunday. The matter is at the heart of the articles of impeachment against the president.

A Justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment on Mr. Barr’s conversations with Mr. Bolton, as did a spokesman for the National Security Council. In a statement on Monday, Mr. Bolton, his publisher and his literary agency said they had not shared the manuscript with The Times.

“There was absolutely no coordination with The New York Times or anyone else regarding the appearance of information about his book, ‘The Room Where It Happened,’ at online booksellers,” Mr. Bolton, Simon & Schuster and Javelin said in a joint statement. “Any assertion to the contrary is unfounded speculation.”

Dean Baquet, the executive editor of The Times, responded that “The Times does not discuss its sources, but I should point out that no one has questioned the accuracy of our report.”
 
"Shoe on other foot test"


I wonder if all the Republicans remember all those times they called for Obama to be impeached......
 
HereticBD said:
Oh' please. You will never be satisfied, no matter what. You're one of the same idiots who were complaining that a 30 year old sexual assault allegation wasn't properly investigated...despite having all pertinent witnesses interviewed, multiple vetting processes, FBI investigations, etc, etc.

The jig is up. All you and the Dems want is to drag this out as long as possible. You don't care about "facts". You care about the narrative.

The Reps should 100% tell the Dems and their lazy ass impeachment scheme to fuck right off. If and when Bolton can't give you any smoking gun, it will be another thing that needs to be looked at, and then another, and another...

I look forward to the Reps telling you and your ilk to kick rocks.
Click to expand...

You failed to address the situation in the least, settling for a moan.

Again, if this is such a hoax, why refuse to let anyone involved testify, and why refuse to release a single legally requested document? Remember, we've got the President recorded ordering a Russian mobster in his employ to get rid of a US ambassador who was in the way of his extortion/bribery scheme.

I'll wait.....
 
PolishHeadlock2 said:
Oh



WASHINGTON — John R. Bolton, the former national security adviser, privately told Attorney General William P. Barr last year that he had concerns that President Trump was effectively granting personal favors to the autocratic leaders of Turkey and China, according to an unpublished manuscript by Mr. Bolton.

Mr. Barr responded by pointing to a pair of Justice Department investigations of companies in those countries and said he was worried that Mr. Trump had created the appearance that he had undue influence over what would typically be independent inquiries, according to the manuscript. Backing up his point, Mr. Barr mentioned conversations Mr. Trump had with the leaders, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey and President Xi Jinping of China.

Mr. Bolton’s account underscores the fact that the unease about Mr. Trump’s seeming embrace of authoritarian leaders, long expressed by experts and his opponents, also existed among some of the senior cabinet officers entrusted by the president to carry out his foreign policy and national security agendas.

Mr. Bolton recounted his discussion with Mr. Barr in a draft of an unpublished book manuscript that he submitted nearly a month ago to the White House for review. People familiar with the manuscript described its contents on the condition of anonymity.

The book also contains an account of Mr. Trump telling Mr. Bolton in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations of political rivals, The New York Times reported on Sunday. The matter is at the heart of the articles of impeachment against the president.

A Justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment on Mr. Barr’s conversations with Mr. Bolton, as did a spokesman for the National Security Council. In a statement on Monday, Mr. Bolton, his publisher and his literary agency said they had not shared the manuscript with The Times.

“There was absolutely no coordination with The New York Times or anyone else regarding the appearance of information about his book, ‘The Room Where It Happened,’ at online booksellers,” Mr. Bolton, Simon & Schuster and Javelin said in a joint statement. “Any assertion to the contrary is unfounded speculation.”

Dean Baquet, the executive editor of The Times, responded that “The Times does not discuss its sources, but I should point out that no one has questioned the accuracy of our report.”
Click to expand...


LOL, okay, so when Barr denies any such claims of Bolton raising these "concerns"(LOL), then what?

Also, LOL @ "No coordination". No Sir. The timing of all this is just a big coincidence.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,236,566
Messages
55,427,787
Members
174,774
Latest member
Judoka_Noob

Share this page

Back
Top