- Joined
- Jul 27, 2016
- Messages
- 506
- Reaction score
- 0
should've left his monkey ass there
should've left his monkey ass there
Well yeah, he's probably a narcissist. But Clinton is probably a sociopath. Pick your poison.Why can't people see how crazy this guy is? He's got mental problems.
Well yeah, he's probably a narcissist. But Clinton is probably a sociopath. Pick your poison.
Well 1. Clearly we have seen evidence of Clinton breaking laws, i.e. email scandal.Here's the traits for a sociopath as defined in The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders:
Tell me who this lines up more closely with? The way I read it is:
- Failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest
- Deception, as indicated by repeatedly lying, use of aliases, or conning others for personal profit or pleasure
- Impulsiveness or failure to plan ahead
- Irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults
- Reckless disregard for safety of self or others
- Consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain consistent work behavior or honor financial obligations
- Lack of remorse as indicated by being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another
Clinton: 3, maybe 4
Trump: Solid 6
Sorry but the guy is nuts. Legitimately nuts.
Hillary Clinton is a proven mass murderer.
Here's the traits for a sociopath as defined in The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders:
Tell me who this lines up more closely with? The way I read it is:
- Failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest
- Deception, as indicated by repeatedly lying, use of aliases, or conning others for personal profit or pleasure
- Impulsiveness or failure to plan ahead
- Irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults
- Reckless disregard for safety of self or others
- Consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain consistent work behavior or honor financial obligations
- Lack of remorse as indicated by being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another
Clinton: 3, maybe 4
Trump: Solid 6
Sorry but the guy is nuts. Legitimately nuts.
Well 1. Clearly we have seen evidence of Clinton breaking laws, i.e. email scandal.
2. Lying conning others. Sure. The wiki leaks provides evidence of that.
3, 5 and 6. Benghazi
7. Trying to hide Benghazi killings when confronted by slain sons mother.
Clinton would be a solid 6. Now, granted neither of us are psychologists and arent qualified to diagnose so how about we both shut the fuck up?
Still a better option than Hillary.
Care to elaborate? I know Hillary isn't the best candidate, but are you seriously saying that Hillary is less qualified and has a worse personality than Trump? Where do you come up with this stuff?
This literally changes nothing in the grand scheme of policy. He's still a better candidate than Hillary.
The concession of your attempt derail this into irrelevant territory is accepted.Sure Bush is the Tarp daddy that Obama/Hillary voted for, which actually did make money, but the stimulus was much bigger and spent a lot of money in embarrassing ways.
Hilary also voted for the War in Iraq and was head of the State dept. she should be somewhat accountable for billions being handed out in taxpayer money, is that too much to ask? I mean if Tarp sent you a check for a million you would send it back, think any company would sent it back? Trumps corporation is a piece of shit Wal-Street type for taking money from incompetent/ irresponsible politicians whom can't even account for billions of dollars being thrown around?
Btw, if you hate "Wal-Street types" Trump is probably the first candidate that doesn't owe them anything. He's accepted a fraction of what Sanders has taken from them.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...-hillary-clinton-19-thousand-to-donald-trump/
Fire marshals aren't firefighters. They're building inspectors. It's a bureaucratic position.
Please learn the fucking distinction. I have family that were volunteer firefighters.
I don't like it when you associate them with a position that can be so corrupt it leads to incidents like this one.....
Edit: I see that the thread title was changed. TY. Sorry if i come off angry. It's just I'm no big fan of corrupt bureaucrats. And Fire marshals have a spotty track record of taking bribes, kickbacks to approve unsafe building conditions.
Trump is certainly a bit of a narcissist.Well yeah, he's probably a narcissist. But Clinton is probably a sociopath. Pick your poison.
So now trump is going off on an Ohio fire Marshall. Accusing him of playing politics
It is an explanation, you're just obsessed with inconsequential day to day news trying to slam Trump.That's not an explanation for how he is a better choice. I can't seem to find real answers on why Hillary is so bad compared to Trump.